Skip to main content

 

Rick Santorum reiterated his belief that states should have the right to outlaw contraception during an interview with ABC News yesterday, saying, “The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that. It is not a constitutional right, the state has the right to pass whatever statues they have.”  Santorum has long opposed the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling “that invalidated a Connecticut law banning contraception” and has also pledged to completely defund federal funding for contraception if elected president.

 

At a campaign stop in Sioux City, Iowa on Sunday, Republican presidential hopeful Rick Santorum singled out blacks as being recipients of assistance through federal benefit programs, telling a mostly-white audience he doesn’t want to “make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money.” [...]

It is unclear why Santorum pinpointed blacks specifically as recipients of federal aid.

CBS points out that only nine percent of Iowans on food stamps are black — and 84 percent are white. Nationally, 39 percent of welfare recipients are white, 37 percent are black, and 17 percent are Hispanic. So Santorum’s decision to single out black welfare recipients plays right into insulting — and inaccurate — stereotypes of the kind of people some voters might expect to want a “handout.”

 



The GOP needs to find a candidate that never speaks.  Then and only then will they be unable to make racist, bigoted remarks. 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

A review of a clearer version of the video, however, casts serious doubt on whether Santorum actually said “black people’s lives.”

CBS News has posted a cleaner version of Santorum’s remarks, and it seems as though Santorum did not actually say “black people’s lives,” but rather, that he stumbled in mid-sentence with a verbal tic that sounded like that.

“I don’t want to make…mmbligh…people’s lives better” is what it sounds like to me, although CBS News also transcribes it as “”make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money.”

Given the preceding context, in which he talks about the government trying to get more Iowans enrolled in Medicaid, the former explanation makes much more sense than the latter.

The Santorum campaign has still not returned our request for comment.

Here’s the CBS clip. The viewer can judge, but even as an LGBT-friendly liberal, I’m inclined to give Santorum the benefit of the doubt here:

 

http://www.mediaite.com/online...%99s-money%E2%80%99/

When asked about the comments in an interview with "CBS Evening News" anchor Scott Pelley, Santorum said he wasn't aware of the context of his remark, but mentioned that he had recently watched the movie "Waiting for Superman," which analyzes the American public education system through the stories of several students and their families. (The students and their families portrayed in the movie represent several races.)

"I've seen that quote, I haven't seen the context in which that was made," Santorum told Pelley, of the Sunday remarks. "Yesterday I talked for example about a movie called, um, what was it? 'Waiting for Superman,' which was about black children and so I don't know whether it was in response and I was talking about that."



Strange that he didnt just deny making the remark, unless he made it and it was recorded.  He just confirmed what everyone was thinking, so no harm no foul. 

Originally Posted by Contendah:

Santorum's anti-contraception bias is obviously traceable to his Catholic roots.  If he believes that states have the constitutional right to prohibit artificial contraception, then one must wonder just what other elements of behavior he would cede to states to regulate on account of the Pope says so.

What? Like JFK & RFK?

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Contendah:

Santorum's anti-contraception bias is obviously traceable to his Catholic roots.  If he believes that states have the constitutional right to prohibit artificial contraception, then one must wonder just what other elements of behavior he would cede to states to regulate on account of the Pope says so.

What? Like JFK & RFK?

We can add history to the list of things Mark doesn't understand.

Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Contendah:

Santorum's anti-contraception bias is obviously traceable to his Catholic roots.  If he believes that states have the constitutional right to prohibit artificial contraception, then one must wonder just what other elements of behavior he would cede to states to regulate on account of the Pope says so.

What? Like JFK & RFK?

We can add history to the list of things Mark doesn't understand.

I actually threw that out there as "troll bait"... nice going Jimi...

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Contendah:

Santorum's anti-contraception bias is obviously traceable to his Catholic roots.  If he believes that states have the constitutional right to prohibit artificial contraception, then one must wonder just what other elements of behavior he would cede to states to regulate on account of the Pope says so.

What? Like JFK & RFK?

We can add history to the list of things Mark doesn't understand.

I actually threw that out there as "troll bait"... nice going Jimi...

===================

You don't know what you don't know jimmma. JFK & RFK didn't

believe the same as Santorum on church and state.

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Contendah:

Santorum's anti-contraception bias is obviously traceable to his Catholic roots.  If he believes that states have the constitutional right to prohibit artificial contraception, then one must wonder just what other elements of behavior he would cede to states to regulate on account of the Pope says so.

What? Like JFK & RFK?

We can add history to the list of things Mark doesn't understand.

I actually threw that out there as "troll bait"... nice going Jimi...

Sure, you did.

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Contendah:

Santorum's anti-contraception bias is obviously traceable to his Catholic roots.  If he believes that states have the constitutional right to prohibit artificial contraception, then one must wonder just what other elements of behavior he would cede to states to regulate on account of the Pope says so.

What? Like JFK & RFK?

___

Oh? And where did you ever hear of JFK or RFK opining that the states can legitimately ban contraception? Get real.

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Contendah:

Santorum's anti-contraception bias is obviously traceable to his Catholic roots.  If he believes that states have the constitutional right to prohibit artificial contraception, then one must wonder just what other elements of behavior he would cede to states to regulate on account of the Pope says so.

What? Like JFK & RFK?

___

Oh? And where did you ever hear of JFK or RFK opining that the states can legitimately ban contraception? Get real.

 

Oh, wait, you were only throwing out "troll bait, "  or so you say. But it is obvious that your  assertion of "troll bait" is just a failed cover-up for having posted something irrational.

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Contendah:

Santorum's anti-contraception bias is obviously traceable to his Catholic roots.  If he believes that states have the constitutional right to prohibit artificial contraception, then one must wonder just what other elements of behavior he would cede to states to regulate on account of the Pope says so.

What? Like JFK & RFK?

___

Oh? And where did you ever hear of JFK or RFK opining that the states can legitimately ban contraception? Get real.

 

Oh, wait, you were only throwing out "troll bait, "  or so you say. But it is obvious that your  assertion of "troll bait" is just a failed cover-up for having posted something irrational.

LOL... Contendah of nothing, if you and Jimi both would be comforted by the notion that it wasn't "troll bait", which it was, then by all means comfort yourselves...

 

That goes double for you Contendah of nothing! You bit twice!

Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Contendah:

Santorum's anti-contraception bias is obviously traceable to his Catholic roots.  If he believes that states have the constitutional right to prohibit artificial contraception, then one must wonder just what other elements of behavior he would cede to states to regulate on account of the Pope says so.

What? Like JFK & RFK?

We can add history to the list of things Mark doesn't understand.

I actually threw that out there as "troll bait"... nice going Jimi...

Sure, you did.

I did, but don't feel badly, Contendah of nothing bit too... twice even! Heheheh... you guys are too funny... any more hilarity and you simply become sad without the pathos...

 

 

Now we breathlessly await Jimi's Gen-X style response, "Whatever..."

Last edited by marksw59

Saw Santorum in TV last night. When asked about his comment on the states having the right to make contraceptives illegal, he again confirmed he believe that under the constitution, the states had that right.

 

Then, he stated he believed it would be wrong to outlaw contraceptives.  Further, he stated that he would vote against such a ban.  As Santorum is running for president, not the governor of a state, this entire line of debate is void. 

Originally Posted by interventor1212:

Saw Santorum in TV last night. When asked about his comment on the states having the right to make contraceptives illegal, he again confirmed he believe that under the constitution, the states had that right.

 

Then, he stated he believed it would be wrong to outlaw contraceptives.  Further, he stated that he would vote against such a ban.  As Santorum is running for president, not the governor of a state, this entire line of debate is void. 


Santorum has affirmed that he would govern as his religion has taught him.

What is hilarious is that Romney only beat him 8 votes. 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×