Skip to main content

Forget global warming: Welcome to the new Ice Age
Lorne Gunter, National Post
Published: Monday, February 25, 2008


Climate change could be the next subprime meltdown

Snow cover over North America and much of Siberia, Mongolia and China is greater than at any time since 1966.

The U.S. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) reported that many American cities and towns suffered record cold temperatures in January and early February. According to the NCDC, the average temperature in January "was -0.3 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average."

China is surviving its most brutal winter in a century. Temperatures in the normally balmy south were so low for so long that some middle-sized cities went days and even weeks without electricity because once power lines had toppled it was too cold or too icy to repair them.

There have been so many snow and ice storms in Ontario and Quebec in the past two months that the real estate market has felt the pinch as home buyers have stayed home rather than venturing out looking for new houses.

In just the first two weeks of February, Toronto received 70 cm of snow, smashing the record of 66.6 cm for the entire month set back in the pre-SUV, pre-Kyoto, pre-carbon footprint days of 1950.

And remember the Arctic Sea ice? The ice we were told so hysterically last fall had melted to its "lowest levels on record? Never mind that those records only date back as far as 1972 and that there is anthropological and geological evidence of much greater melts in the past.

The ice is back.
"Except for ending Slavery, Fascism, Nazism, and Communism; war has never solved anything!"
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

And, as to false newspaper reports:

New York Times Finally Retracts Clinton Story
The New York Times has finally retracted its flagrantly false story about Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY):
An article published on the Web site of The New York Times on Sunday reported on a speech by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton in Rogers, Ark. The headline and article said that Mrs. Clinton had criticized Democrats on Saturday for “wasting time” by dealing with issues that helped Republicans turn out voters rather than finding consensus on mainstream subjects. The opening sentence of the article and the headline were based on a misinterpretation of a passage in her speech in which she first referred to the Democrats’ agenda in the Senate and then went on to criticize the actions of the Republican majority in Congress.
She was referring to the Republican-led Congress — not Democrats…

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/18/clinton-retraction/

The pre-launch publicity for a new Time-CNN collaboration called ''NewsStand'' made its first piece sound like the daring international scoop of every journalist's dreams. But yesterday, less than a month after CNN and Time jointly charged that America secretly used nerve gas on a mission designed to kill defectors during the Vietnam War, they took it back
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE1DE...30A35754C0A96E958260

False report by NYT on Giuliani love triangle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_LWWu5S9uI

The New York Times has just issued a retraction to their piece a few days ago attemting to link Ron Paul to white supremacists. They admit that the piece "should not have been published."
http://politics.propeller.com/story/2007/12/26/new-york...ar-against-ron-paul/

A staff reporter for The New York Times committed frequent acts of journalistic fraud while covering significant news events in recent months, an investigation by Times journalists has found. The widespread fabrication and plagiarism represent a profound betrayal of trust and a low point in the 152-year history of the newspaper.

The reporter, Jayson Blair, 27, misled readers and Times colleagues with dispatches that purported to be from Maryland, Texas and other states, when often he was far away, in New York. He fabricated comments. He concocted scenes. He lifted material from other newspapers and wire services. He selected details from photographs to create the impression he had been somewhere or seen someone, when he had not.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9403E1DB...32A25756C0A9659C8B63
Anything from the NYT I take with 2 pallets of salt. 3 with Scaife publications. 4 with the WSJ editorial voice.

The soi-disant "liberal" press is as guilty of one step less than pure fabrication as is the right. In fact, the press is in a horrid state right now as a rule. Investigative reporting is gone. The budgets can't support it, they tell us. In its place we have increased "celebrity" coverage, softball pieces on Iraq that wered all-but dictated from the DOD and DOS from the NYT and pablum. And that is just in print daily journals! Lord save us from the intertubes, the wireless and the televisors.
Chris Dede of the Harvard Education School treats "new communication and information exchange media" there and has a theory of "informationn overload" where the person is at more of a task to discern the "fact" from the analysis than merely locate the mixture.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×