Skip to main content

On Tuesday, 8/18, under FeedBack, DeepFat inquired about becoming a moderator for our forum since we don't have regular moderation. I thought this was a good idea.
Then in less than 2 hours, the thread was locked with this post.

TimesDaily Admin
New Kid on the Block
Posted 18 August 2009 06:44 PM:
That note is no longer valid and has been removed. We are not taking requests to be moderators.
--admin
Posts: 1 | Registered: 06 May 2009


So....if poop gets started on here, it will stay until someone on TD decides to check out the forum? Confused
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by buffalo:
i'm sure tha paper jerked back hard on tha reins at deepfat bein a monator ..likly why the idee was skrubed
As I understand it, there are no regular mods. Things that get reported, are viewed by who is available. Then they take or dont, appropriate action.
As far as your comment buffalo, it had nothing to do with DF asking to be a mod. In the olden days, right before the TD was sold, anyone could apply to help the mods out. About all that it meant was if the mod from the general public reported a thread, it got looked at first.
DF would have made a good mod, he seems fair. Your comment buffalo, had undertones. Undertones that arent needed here at the TD. And if someone had reported YOUR post and DF been a mod, he would have probably left it.
quote:
As I understand it, there are no regular mods. Things that get reported, are viewed by who is available. Then they take or dont, appropriate action.
As far as your comment buffalo, it had nothing to do with DF asking to be a mod. In the olden days, right before the TD was sold, anyone could apply to help the mods out. About all that it meant was if the mod from the general public reported a thread, it got looked at first.
DF would have made a good mod, he seems fair. Your comment buffalo, had undertones. Undertones that arent needed here at the TD. And if someone had reported YOUR post and DF been a mod, he would have probably left it.


I agree, OB. DeepFat would be a fair moderator. DeepFat has never enabled the trolls; he's just pointed out the silliness of the fighting a few times.

So he's been one of the few behaving like an adult in all of this, buffalo, how does this disqualify him? I think having a mod like DF would bring a little fun back to the forum, and considering all the personal information that was plastered all over the TD last weekend, I think people would be less afraid to post with him as a mod.
quote:
Originally posted by Wild Irish Prose:
quote:
As I understand it, there are no regular mods. Things that get reported, are viewed by who is available. Then they take or dont, appropriate action.
As far as your comment buffalo, it had nothing to do with DF asking to be a mod. In the olden days, right before the TD was sold, anyone could apply to help the mods out. About all that it meant was if the mod from the general public reported a thread, it got looked at first.
DF would have made a good mod, he seems fair. Your comment buffalo, had undertones. Undertones that arent needed here at the TD. And if someone had reported YOUR post and DF been a mod, he would have probably left it.

I agree, OB. DeepFat would be a fair moderator. DeepFat has never enabled the trolls; he's just pointed out the silliness of the fighting a few times.

So he's been one of the few behaving like an adult in all of this, buffalo, how does this disqualify him? I think having a mod like DF would bring a little fun back to the forum, and considering all the personal information that was plastered all over the TD last weekend, I think people would be less afraid to post with him as a mod.

Hi Rose,

Do you, or anyone else on the Religion Forum, really believe that Deep can be an objective moderator when it comes to Christianity or Christian subjects?

If so, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell you really cheap.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
quote:
Originally posted by buffalo:
i'm sure tha paper jerked back hard on tha reins at deepfat bein a monator ..likly why the idee was skrubed


Ok...I'll bite. Why would you say that? I think I know but I'm curious. But please play nice. I so don't want this to turn into one of those "put down, be mean" threads. Wink
He would probably be one of the most fair moderator's we could get.
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
Do you, or anyone else on the Religion Forum, really believe that Deep can be an objective moderator when it comes to Christianity or Christian subjects?
If so, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell you really cheap.
God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,
Bill


You say something like that & then say God Bless? Not a very good witness.
I'll buy your bridge, & I say that to say this. I don't think Deep would be as judgemental as you are, Bill. Wink
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
quote:
Originally posted by Wild Irish Prose:
quote:
As I understand it, there are no regular mods. Things that get reported, are viewed by who is available. Then they take or dont, appropriate action.
As far as your comment buffalo, it had nothing to do with DF asking to be a mod. In the olden days, right before the TD was sold, anyone could apply to help the mods out. About all that it meant was if the mod from the general public reported a thread, it got looked at first.
DF would have made a good mod, he seems fair. Your comment buffalo, had undertones. Undertones that arent needed here at the TD. And if someone had reported YOUR post and DF been a mod, he would have probably left it.

I agree, OB. DeepFat would be a fair moderator. DeepFat has never enabled the trolls; he's just pointed out the silliness of the fighting a few times.

So he's been one of the few behaving like an adult in all of this, buffalo, how does this disqualify him? I think having a mod like DF would bring a little fun back to the forum, and considering all the personal information that was plastered all over the TD last weekend, I think people would be less afraid to post with him as a mod.

Hi Rose,

Do you, or anyone else on the Religion Forum, really believe that Deep can be an objective moderator when it comes to Christianity or Christian subjects?

If so, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell you really cheap.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill
If it came down to him being a mod, yes, he would be fair in all the categories of the forum. Even the one you try to run Bill. Bill, I used to be a deacon. It is people like you that try to force feed people with Christianity that gives Christians a bad name. I used to visit people, to try to get them to come to church. One of the most used replies was, "I dont want to go to church with a bunch of hypocrites" To which i would respond, I dont want to go to hell with them either.
Back to the subject, yeah i do think he would have been fair even to you BetterThanThouBill....
OB and semiannualchick,

I would have said what you said, if you hadn't said it first. Big Grin

Mr. Gray,

I've observed that Deep stands firmly by his principles and defends what he thinks; I respect that, even though I am Christian (today anyway) and he is an atheist. He wouldn't ban someone for disagreeing with him; if he did, who would he have to argue with? Wink

BTW, hasn't it occurred to you that beating DF and the others over the head the way you do will never bring them around to your point of view? If any of them did suddenly decide to become Christians, you'd be the last one they'd inform because they wouldn't give you the satisfaction of being right.
quote:
Originally posted by semiannualchick:
quote:
Originally posted by buffalo:
i'm sure tha paper jerked back hard on tha reins at deepfat bein a monator ..likly why the idee was skrubed


Ok...I'll bite. Why would you say that? I think I know but I'm curious. But please play nice. I so don't want this to turn into one of those "put down, be mean" threads. Wink
He would probably be one of the most fair moderator's we could get.

why semi deepfat done put de buffalo on iggnor. i been testin to see what hes made of for th paper. he faled tha test. its hiz way or tha hiway. he don repersent the forum he repersent same thang you do. no eyballs
My friends,

Thanks for the support. There is a difference between my opinions and what is fair to post under the Terms of Service. Yes, I would have gotten it.

But, the TD powers that be have decided not to allow volunteer moderators here. More's the pity.

To give the TD their rightful creds, they did erase posts and ban certain users who violated the Terms.

I also think they went overboard in a couple of cases. We can disagree.

I remain willing to help mod this forum, if the TD is willing. I appreciate the voices of support, and would perform my duties within the Terms. That's enough, the Terms are well written.

DF
quote:
Originally posted by DeepFat:
My friends,

Thanks for the support. There is a difference between my opinions and what is fair to post under the Terms of Service. Yes, I would have gotten it.

But, the TD powers that be have decided not to allow volunteer moderators here. More's the pity.

To give the TD their rightful creds, they did erase posts and ban certain users who violated the Terms.

I also think they went overboard in a couple of cases. We can disagree.

I remain willing to help mod this forum, if the TD is willing. I appreciate the voices of support, and would perform my duties within the Terms. That's enough, the Terms are well written.

DF
Big Grin
quote:
Originally posted by OriginalBama:
quote:
Originally posted by LMM:
Buffalo,
A lot of people put you on ignore because trying to read your posts is sheer torture.

Do ya git wat i men?
Add another one that put he/she/it on ignore. He/she/it ought to let the deer and the antelope type. I'm sure they could make more sense.


That ignore feature has became you folks latest weapon of choice hasn't it? How childish!

Can't block vote to get 'em banned now can you?
quote:
Originally posted by misterme:
quote:
Originally posted by OriginalBama:
quote:
Originally posted by LMM:
Buffalo,
A lot of people put you on ignore because trying to read your posts is sheer torture.

Do ya git wat i men?
Add another one that put he/she/it on ignore. He/she/it ought to let the deer and the antelope type. I'm sure they could make more sense.


That ignore feature has became you folks latest weapon of choice hasn't it? How childish!

Can't block vote to get 'em banned now can you?
CLICK, nanner nanner boo boo
quote:
Originally posted by OriginalBama:
quote:
Originally posted by misterme:
quote:
Originally posted by OriginalBama:
quote:
Originally posted by LMM:
Buffalo,
A lot of people put you on ignore because trying to read your posts is sheer torture.

Do ya git wat i men?
Add another one that put he/she/it on ignore. He/she/it ought to let the deer and the antelope type. I'm sure they could make more sense.


That ignore feature has became you folks latest weapon of choice hasn't it? How childish!

Can't block vote to get 'em banned now can you?
CLICK, nanner nanner boo boo


Big Grin
quote:
Originally posted by tomfan:
Bill, you remind me of something my dad told me when I was a child. He said to beware of making unfounded accusations; that often they disclose what you, the accuser, would do, instead of what the other person would do.

I don't always agree with DeepFat, but I think he would be a fair moderator.


There are others on here that disagree with all of you!!! DeepFat would not be a good moderator. And none of you would, just look how you jumped Bill and all he did was voice his opinion. Roll Eyes You guys want be happy unless its your group controlling it. Razzer
quote:
Originally posted by jenniejo:
There are others on here that disagree with all of you!!! DeepFat would not be a good moderator. And none of you would, just look how you jumped Bill and all he did was voice his opinion. Roll Eyes You guys want be happy unless its your group controlling it. Razzer


No one jumped Bill. We gave our opinion just as BRO. Bill did, which wasn't a godly, loving opinion. It was what BRO. Bill Christians would call a "Rebuke". Wink
quote:
You guys want be happy unless its your group controlling it.

Its you guys 'won't' be happy.

And I want no control of anything nor do I block vote anyone.
If I report a post, it is because it is offensive, obscene, or slanderous.

Example: There is a troll that posted "Water the Tree of Liberty, kill a republican!". That I reported and alas, it and he/she/it/ is still here, on ignore now.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×