Now, Is this really that unreasonable?

quote:

Originally posted by Jugflier:
Diddle,
These guys were weaned on the tit of Rush Limbaugh, don't confuse them with the constitution.

Oops! Sorry. Just as long as that evil communism doesn't infect our brains and the American Dream!

quote:

Originally posted by Renegade Nation:


I really don't know what you're trying to refer to...Lincoln was for central banking under Washington's control...He was completely for and supportive of corporate/government consolidation...especially the railroad.

And you seem to forget the "central bank" does not lie under Washington's control. Washington is under it's control!

Diddle,

Do you have evidence that Booth and Oswald were working at the behest of the Rothschilds, or does this type of thing just appeal to an over-active imagination?

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
LOL! Those pesky communists from the 50's!! LOL!

They are still here, my naive one. Do you think they just disappeared.

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:

quote:

Originally posted by Jugflier:
Diddle,
These guys were weaned on the tit of Rush Limbaugh, don't confuse them with the constitution.

Oops! Sorry. Just as long as that evil communism doesn't infect our brains and the American Dream!

You and jughead are the people the communists referred to when they said you could spit in an American's face, tell him/her its raining and they will believe it. I guess you think communism was just a hoax. What nutjobs.

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:
Diddle,

Do you have evidence that Booth and Oswald were working at the behest of the Rothschilds, or does this type of thing just appeal to an over-active imagination?

Your words not mine. Do you deny any of my offerings? Again, it is what it is. And that's just the way it is.

quote:

Originally posted by kperk014:

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
LOL! Those pesky communists from the 50's!! LOL!

They are still here, my naive one. Do you think they just disappeared.

And there's a boogey man under my bed!

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
LOL! Those pesky communists from the 50's!! LOL!

They existed, as the Venona Papers and NKVD/KGB files showed. However, they are not dead. Its the New Lefties from the late sixties, who are in power now, that are causing the problems.

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:

quote:

Originally posted by Renegade Nation:


I really don't know what you're trying to refer to...Lincoln was for central banking under Washington's control...He was completely for and supportive of corporate/government consolidation...especially the railroad.

And you seem to forget the "central bank" does not lie under Washington's control. Washington is under it's control!

Were you a member of the John Birchers! That was their line in the sixties.

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:

quote:

Originally posted by kperk014:

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
LOL! Those pesky communists from the 50's!! LOL!

They are still here, my naive one. Do you think they just disappeared.

And there's a boogey man under my bed!

From the Fed, I suppose!

quote:

Originally posted by FirenzeVeritas:
Jug, 9/11 aside, what don't you understand about Obama being a US citizen no matter where he was born. He could have been born on Mars, as long as one of his parents was a US citizen.

Not sure but he might have this in mind.

Only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both citizens of the U.S.) may be president of the United States

It's sad that a fine young man like Tim Tebow can never be considered for the presidency while an inexperienced doofus with questionable citizenship and even greater questionable character and background gets elected.

As the law was written when Obama was born, his mother was too young to confer automatic citizenship upon him if was born outside the nation. The law has changed since then.

That said, I'm not a birther.

quote:

Do you deny any of my offerings?

Yes I do. I make judgements on things that can be proven, not the fodder of fairy tales.

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:

quote:

Do you deny any of my offerings?

Yes I do. I make judgements on things that can be proven, not the fodder of fairy tales.

Please feel free to disprove one thing I've stated in this thread. Ha!

quote:

Please feel free to disprove one thing I've stated in this thread. Ha!

Well, you've said nothing, so I can disprove nothing.

Bilderberg, Rothschild, Illuminati, Skull & Bones, Bohemian Grove, etc...

Does it make you feel better that I've said all this stuff?

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:

quote:

Please feel free to disprove one thing I've stated in this thread. Ha!

Well, you've said nothing, so I can disprove nothing.

Bilderberg, Rothschild, Illuminati, Skull & Bones, Bohemian Grove, etc...

Does it make you feel better that I've said all this stuff?

So what's your point? You started with me yet you failed to point out where I might be misguided.

quote:

Originally posted by elinterventor01:

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
LOL! Those pesky communists from the 50's!! LOL!

They existed, as the Venona Papers and NKVD/KGB files showed. However, they are not dead. Its the New Lefties from the late sixties, who are in power now, that are causing the problems.

Oh I know! It's the neocommies!

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:

quote:

Originally posted by elinterventor01:

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
LOL! Those pesky communists from the 50's!! LOL!

They existed, as the Venona Papers and NKVD/KGB files showed. However, they are not dead. Its the New Lefties from the late sixties, who are in power now, that are causing the problems.

Oh I know! It's the neocommies!

Now, you've got it. Even former SNL libs, like Victoria Jackson, are getting the message.

http://beltwayblips.dailyradar...unist-living-in-the/

quote:

So what's your point? You started with me yet you failed to point out where I might be misguided.

You have now, more than once, challenged others to disprove your claims. It doesn't work that way. It is incumbent on the person making outrageous claims to offer proof, and you have none apparently.

quote:

Originally posted by elinterventor01:

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:

quote:

Originally posted by elinterventor01:

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
LOL! Those pesky communists from the 50's!! LOL!

They existed, as the Venona Papers and NKVD/KGB files showed. However, they are not dead. Its the New Lefties from the late sixties, who are in power now, that are causing the problems.

Oh I know! It's the neocommies!

Now, you've got it. Even former SNL libs, like Victoria Jackson, are getting the message.

http://beltwayblips.dailyradar...unist-living-in-the/

Isn't it funny how people who think they are smart can be so clueless? To downplay the existence of the communist influence in this country is ludicrous!

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:

quote:

So what's your point? You started with me yet you failed to point out where I might be misguided.

You have now, more than once, challenged others to disprove your claims. It doesn't work that way. It is incumbent on the person making outrageous claims to offer proof, and you have none apparently.

And what outrageous claim have I made? I offered up simple facts. Black and white. I only challenged you to disprove my claim. Since you were the one who disputed them. So, yeah. I guess it does work that way.

quote:

Originally posted by kperk014:

quote:

Originally posted by elinterventor01:

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:

quote:

Originally posted by elinterventor01:

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
LOL! Those pesky communists from the 50's!! LOL!

They existed, as the Venona Papers and NKVD/KGB files showed. However, they are not dead. Its the New Lefties from the late sixties, who are in power now, that are causing the problems.

Oh I know! It's the neocommies!

Now, you've got it. Even former SNL libs, like Victoria Jackson, are getting the message.

http://beltwayblips.dailyradar...unist-living-in-the/

Isn't it funny how people who think they are smart can be so clueless? To downplay the existence of the communist influence in this country is ludicrous!

Trust me. Communists should be the least of your fears!

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
Trust me. Communists should be the least of your fears!

True... it's the Fabian Socialists...

quote:

And what outrageous claim have I made?

You suggested that Kennedy and Lincoln were murdered by banking interests here:

quote:

Ask Kennedy and Lincoln how they fared when they took on the "bankers".

You have not backed that up, so when you say this:

quote:

I offered up simple facts. Black and white.

You are not being honest.

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:

quote:

And what outrageous claim have I made?

You suggested that Kennedy and Lincoln were murdered by banking interests here:

quote:

Ask Kennedy and Lincoln how they fared when they took on the "bankers".

You have not backed that up, so when you say this:

quote:

I offered up simple facts. Black and white.

You are not being honest.

I suggested a coincidence. And it's quite a coincidence wouldn't you say?

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:

quote:

Originally posted by Renegade Nation:


I really don't know what you're trying to refer to...Lincoln was for central banking under Washington's control...He was completely for and supportive of corporate/government consolidation...especially the railroad.

And you seem to forget the "central bank" does not lie under Washington's control. Washington is under it's control!

Well no ****...that's what central banking is for...politicians and super elites...And Lincoln...like Clay and Hamilton before him were all for it.

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:

quote:

And what outrageous claim have I made?

You suggested that Kennedy and Lincoln were murdered by banking interests here:

quote:

Ask Kennedy and Lincoln how they fared when they took on the "bankers".

You have not backed that up, so when you say this:

quote:

I offered up simple facts. Black and white.

You are not being honest.

I suggested a coincidence. And it's quite a coincidence wouldn't you say?

What coincidence? And what facts?

gobley****...disprove it!

What we have here is failure to communicate.

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
What we have here is failure to communicate.

Diddle, don't waste your time. These people think Bush 43 was a good president. Enough said.

quote:

Diddle, don't waste your time. These people think Bush 43 was a good president. Enough said.

I think he was pretty terrible. It's possible to dislike both Bush and illogical arguements.

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:

quote:

Diddle, don't waste your time. These people think Bush 43 was a good president. Enough said.

I think he was pretty terrible. It's possible to dislike both Bush and illogical arguements.

Lol Dolemite,
Present company excepted.

Bush 43 was not what I was looking for in a President. There was simply one overriding thing in Bush's favor, I saw him (and still do) as a better choice than 'The Goracle'... and that my friends is saying VERY little.

quote:

Bush 43 was not what I was looking for in a President. There was simply one overriding thing in Bush's favor, I saw him (and still do) as a better choice than 'The Goracle'... and that my friends is saying VERY little.

Meh. If he was any better, it's by an insignificant margin. I'm not going to bother guessing at what messes Gore would have caused, but I suspect he would have actually avoided many of Bush's mistakes.

Maybe but he would have created a lot of his own. Just look at his position on global warming and you'll see how far out he is.

quote:

Maybe but he would have created a lot of his own.

He, no doubt, would have made many messes as president, and likely would have done a terrible job. Still, given what we actually got, it's REALLY hard to say he would have been worse.

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:

quote:

Maybe but he would have created a lot of his own.

He, no doubt, would have made many messes as president, and likely would have done a terrible job. Still, given what we actually got, it's REALLY hard to say he would have been worse.

We'll never know the answer to that one. What we do know is the one we have now is the worst thing we could ever have imagined. I just hope we survive Obama.

quote:

Originally posted by Jugflier:

quote:

Originally posted by diddle:
What we have here is failure to communicate.

Diddle, don't waste your time. These people think Bush 43 was a good president. Enough said.

Not many people here think he was a good president, jug. He was far too liberal when it came to spending. He was pretty much a dimocrat when it came to that. I can say one thing good about him though. On his WORST day, he was millions of times better than that kenyan klown we have in there now dirtying things up.

.

quote:

On his WORST day, he was millions of times better than that kenyan klown we have in there now dirtying things up.

Not really, but if it makes you feel better, go ahead.

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:

quote:

On his WORST day, he was millions of times better than that kenyan klown we have in there now dirtying things up.

Not really, but if it makes you feel better, go ahead.

Thank you Mr Thinks he knows it all!