I think race may have had a small factor in the outcome of the case. This was only a couple of years after the Rodney King riots and everyone was prepared for another set of riots if OJ was convicted. The main factors though was simply poor prosecution and bad detective work. Too many mistakes were made when the case was being put together and the prosecution did not explain the evidence properly. Several jurors said afterwards they didn't understand exactly what the DNA evidence meant. Remember, this was one of the first cases where DNA was presented. OJ got off simply because of bumbling cops and better defense attorneys.
O.J. is guilty as sin he just had the money to buy his way out, he has no respect for any race black or white, just look what he has done to 2 famlies, & his childern, he is living a good life while his children suffer, he just got away with murder, i know how the families feel because i have 2 loved ones murdered, my prayers & thoughts are with the Goldman, & Brown families
I have said all along that he was guility this book only proves it why would you put out a book saying. "If I did it, Here's how it happened". this is sick!!!! does he not have any compassion for his children. He is getting richer off of this as he laughs all the way to the bank with blood money all the evidence was there he got off cause he was famous and had money. But that dont make it right. What happened to justice. It all pointed to him but because he had money he bought the best lawyers that got him off at whatever price. It just makes me sick
quote:
Originally posted by NashBama:
I think race may have had a small factor in the outcome of the case. This was only a couple of years after the Rodney King riots and everyone was prepared for another set of riots if OJ was convicted. The main factors though was simply poor prosecution and bad detective work. Too many mistakes were made when the case was being put together and the prosecution did not explain the evidence properly. Several jurors said afterwards they didn't understand exactly what the DNA evidence meant. Remember, this was one of the first cases where DNA was presented. OJ got off simply because of bumbling cops and better defense attorneys.

Bad detective work? You must be one of those who bought that whole cops planted everything line of bull! As if those police would want to risk the little pay check they do get for the likes of this pig right? Use some common sense here will you?
As far as the trial, I also think it was the camera's in the court room that played a big part of this. Judge wanted air time and to make money off it afterwards, state reps wanted to show off and get money afterwards too as did most of the players and this pig is no different he was just waiting til he thought it would be enough time to have passed.
I am sure the riots they had with Rodney King Verdict also had a play in the outcome but not by much.
As I said before they had less proof in the Scott Peterson case and they sure got the guilty verdict but yet with blood,foot prints, motive, access those 12 people could NOT send the pig to the gas chamber where he belongs.
I guess the cops also planted the limo driver to show up earlier than supposed to right? Just thought I would shove some more goof ups over to the cops side for you..
Even all these years later I am still amazed that some people will STILL put the blame on the cops and not on the ONE who got away with the PERFECT MURDER... What a shame.
Do you not remember the case? One of the defense's best weapons was how poorly the evidence was handled at the scene. The whole thing was a mess. It wasn't the perfect murder because everyone knows he did it. The detectives job is to find and secure evidence so the prosecution can have a solid case. If a known killer walks free, who's fault is it?
quote:
Originally posted by NashBama:
Do you not remember the case? One of the defense's best weapons was how poorly the evidence was handled at the scene. The whole thing was a mess. It wasn't the perfect murder because everyone knows he did it. The detectives job is to find and secure evidence so the prosecution can have a solid case. If a known killer walks free, who's fault is it?

No it was the defense's best smoke screen. That's what they were PAID to do is show that it was a sloppy job. Don't know many crime senes that are perfect and not messy or all do by the book. They did FIND AND SECURE EVIDENCE and they did have a SOLID CASE.
They didn't have enough money to sway the 12 jury members.
Again you can't explain how less evidence in the Peterson case then in this pig's case and two totally different outcomes and geeee the defense also claimed shoddy police work there too.
Also has the pig found the "real" killer on all those golf courses in all these years? Could it be he didn't bother looking any further than his bathroom or coke mirror??
It was the pefect murder because he got away with it, never said that nobody KNEW about his guilt just that he GOT AWAY with it, big difference buddy.
This is a quote from Gerald Uelman, a member of the defense team, and a former dean and current professor of law at Santa Clara University in California. Uelmen's role was to prepare and argue all the defense motions regarding what evidence should be kept out of the trial and what should be admitted.

"...we knew that we weren't going to be able to keep the DNA evidence out. So our whole approach was, you can't trust DNA test results if you had incompetent people collecting the evidence and preserving the evidence; that the evidence is only as good as the people who collect it. So our focus had to be on doubts about the integrity of the evidence-collection process. And I think there was lots to talk about. There [was] lots of sloppy handling that gave rise to a reasonable argument that there's nothing wrong with the science, but the science is only as good as the evidence you collect at the scene to analyze."
I don't know what was bungled or planted and what wasn't. I'm sure the jurors felt the same. They would have believed the evidence collected and given a guilty verdict if they'd had no reason to doubt the reliability of the evidence. The fact is that those collecting evidence WERE sloppy and placed just enough doubt in the jurors' minds that jurors were forced to find him 'not guilty'.
Razzer yes. he did it. I'd bet my good tiller on it! Science won! didnt the DNA find him (o.j.) there? And did he(o.j.)plan a run-away-trip? I say he(o.j.) will slip one day. Sickness, a good case of nerves, perhaps a child will get the better of him and he'll confide. Yes, O.J. is as guilty of murder as I am of loving my tiller! Hey O.J....are your plams still sweaty?
Lynda Williams...
Guilty? Shorenuff he is! Guilty of murder! What about her parents? and those of Goldwin? Or whoever the young man was bringing her sunglasses to her...Do I think someone will ever stalk adn carry out another plan? Could be. I'd be very careful and I'd always be lookking over my shoulder, also... Sweatin, runnin, uneasy even in sleep. Sleep? Does he really get a good nights sleep? Geeze! Cant imagine Simpson being swave and smoothe for the rest of his life..He shorenuff will break some day...his past temper fits, and mouthing will prove him He's guilty. First degree of 2 murders. There. I already feel better......Lynda(again)
Here's the real issue and the real question with this case... > If the racial colors of the central figures in this case were exchanged... In other words, OJ was white, Nicole and Ron were black, and the jury was primarily white... How long after the "Not guilty" verdict would it have been before Los Angeles burned to the ground?
quote:
Originally posted by rogerbaggett:
Here's the real issue and the real question with this case... > If the racial colors of the central figures in this case were exchanged... In other words, OJ was white, Nicole and Ron were black, and the jury was primarily white... How long after the "Not guilty" verdict would it have been before Los Angeles burned to the ground?


How many times is that EXACT thing going on across this country and you don't hear about it to get any town burned to the ground??
Why is it that when a black person assults,murders,attacks a white the white person can not claim it as a hate crime but by golly the black person can and will do so if it is a white who does the same to them.
Why can't whites claim reverse discrimination when they are passed over for a black person?
How many times does it have to be said that this is far from a RACE issue but is about the cold blooded murder of TWO people bottom line. Only those who do not want to admit the pig is guilty are the ones pulling the race card and it's long over due for that card to be placed in the middle of the deck or thrown out all together.
quote:
Originally posted by rogerbaggett:
Here's the real issue and the real question with this case... > If the racial colors of the central figures in this case were exchanged... In other words, OJ was white, Nicole and Ron were black, and the jury was primarily white... How long after the "Not guilty" verdict would it have been before Los Angeles burned to the ground?


The law is the law. Whether or not L.A. reacted violently has no bearing on the verdict. I think jurors take their job seriously. When you serve on a jury, you look at a real flesh and blood person and know your decision decides their fate. We can make light of it all day, but when someone is faced with that and they're in a group faced with the same (accountability!), they do their best to make the right choice using the evidence and the facts they are given.
boots...go back and read the post...in summary, my point was that in most quarters of the black community, they believe the "system" belongs to the whites...if you will remember, one of the jurors on the Simpson debacle, a black lady, spoke to that effect....In my own experience, I have found that a great percentage of blacks feel that way.....
I also think that where O.J.'s wealth played a part is that he could afford the best, not just the best attorney but the best defense 'team', an advantage very few can claim. Although our system is the greatest in the world, this is where I feel the system fails. If you or I were charged with the same crime, we don't get a highly capable defense team to work on our case because we simply can't afford it. This is unfair. There should be limits. No one should be allowed a 4 million dollar 'dream team'.
MONEY??? Hmmmm, isn't OJ the one who declared bankruptcy after he was ordered to pay millions to Nicole's and Ron's family???

And isn't he also the one who got paid millions for going on that show saying how he WOULD have done it if it were him??? *GAG*

OJ GUILTY? Heck yes, of more than just murder, of being one of the biggest liars in American History, next to politicians that is.
quote:
Originally posted by blparrish4:
O.J.Simpson is guilty. Rember it has been proven in court. (Civil) It's a proven fact Money talks and then you "WALK". But guess what he still has to face the #1 Judge (GOD) Northeast MS.
if i aint mistaken!through court he was found no guilty!is this not a true statement?
quote:
Originally posted by lindanow:
Guilty? Shorenuff he is! Guilty of murder! What about her parents? and those of Goldwin? Or whoever the young man was bringing her sunglasses to her...Do I think someone will ever stalk adn carry out another plan? Could be. I'd be very careful and I'd always be lookking over my shoulder, also... Sweatin, runnin, uneasy even in sleep. Sleep? Does he really get a good nights sleep? Geeze! Cant imagine Simpson being swave and smoothe for the rest of his life..He shorenuff will break some day...his past temper fits, and mouthing will prove him He's guilty. First degree of 2 murders. There. I already feel better......Lynda(again)
you know what you're probably right,he may have committed this crime...but guess what?there's been a many black hang,killed for no reason!get over it!
quote:
Originally posted by hoot_gibson:
quote:
Originally posted by elijah:
He is not an "absolute disgrace" to all the black people who still love the guy..to them he beat 'whitey's system'...a system they totally dispise because they feel there is an disproportionant amount of blacks incarcerated in "whitey's" system

you call that facts?lol..i call what you just tried to explain as being igorant to the truth!
Black people put themselves in prison NOT "Whitey". Black people commit mor crimes than whites. If you want to keep making excuses for them maybe you should start by getting your facts straight.
Every time someone gets in trouble they use the race card. I always thought he did it and it has nothing to do with the fact that he is of a different race than me. The evidence was he did it, but the legal system there failed to do their job when it came to the evidence against him. They dropped the ball and let a killer go free, in my book they are as guilty of the crime as he is.
I think O.J. is guilty 100%. I think everybody on here that is saying because he's black everybody thinks he's guilty! RIDICULOUS! Nobody cares what color he is. Black people are the racist ones, not white. They are the ones that are always throwing up the race card! WHO CARES IF U R BLACK, WHITE, OR WHAT! Get over it! Grow up...he's guilty..who cares?????
I never thought O.J.did I always felt he was framed, and one day he would tell his side of the story. Also where was the Brown family when O.J.'s daughter was being abused by the public, what kinda of nonsense are you people about. Ronald Goldman was gay, why wouldn't his boyfriend have killed them,he was swinging both way right. Leave the man and his children alone I haven't heard a good word about his children's at all, hate causes heart attacks stop and think before you take a person livelyhood away from them with false accusation please let those children's become all they can be and let there father continue to live his senior with his grandchildren and the few friend who believed in him.

Add Reply

Likes (0)
Post

×
×
×
×