The tragic event that occurred in California where an ex-marine went into a nightclub and gunned down 12 people brought the news media out to interview some of those who lost loved ones in that horrible event. One woman was interviewed and you could see, from her clenched jaw, the anger that was seething throughout her as she stated, to the media, and camera, that she wanted no more people offering prayers for her or offering thoughts for her due to the death of her loved one. ALL she wanted and all that would make her feel better is a TOTAL BAN on all guns. Just take everyone's guns away and that would not only make her feel better but would solve the problem.
Everyone can feel for this victim's loved one but anyone that is rational and knows anything knows that the cause of this horrible spree of murder was not the gun or guns but was the deranged person that chose a gun as the instrument to do their killing. Regarding. this woman's desire which would be easier? Elimination of all guns in America or her choosing to move to another country that already bans gun ownership or has total gun control? Naturally the latter would be easier but that's not what liberals want rather they want to change everyone else for their own desires, needs and wants. If there wasn't a gun this idiot and mentally deficient person could have just as easily chosen a knife or made a bomb to do their dirty work and while maybe less would have been killed it would not have ensured that this woman's loved one would not have been the one that died.
People have a difficult time realizing that the problem is not the instrument used to accomplish the deed but rather the person that is mentally deficient that has to resort to an evil deed like this. Still, there is understandable grief but given the level of seething anger that this woman had it could be argued that she presents a danger to some, on some level, given the amount of anger that she has.