Skip to main content

Reverend Jeremiah Wright Was Worse Than Scalise

 

Liberals are outraged over the Steven Scalise scandal—but the left has selective amnesia.

One of the great joys from having been out of the country the past week is that I haven’t been subjected to the suffocating din of the 24/7-cable news cycle.  No ‘Breaking News’ alerts have disturbed me over the course of the holidays until I happened to hear that there was a brewing race scandal in America regarding the House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA).

Naturally, my interest got the better of me and I discovered that some 12 years ago, Scalise spoke before the European-American Unity and Rights Organization run by renowned racist David Duke (R-LA).  I do not know the Whip personally but he has a solid reputation within the House Republican Caucus for his integrity, intelligence and wisdom.  If Scalise says that he had no idea he was speaking before a group of white supremacists, I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. 

In fairness, my alarm bells would have been ringing off the hook if I received an invitation to speak before an organization run by Duke. Again, Scalise has expressed his regret for a “mistake” and that he had no idea of the group’s leadership.  For his part, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has expressed his “full confidence” in Representative Scalise.  I’ve known the Speaker of the House for nearly 25 years and he has a zero tolerance for racism and bigotry.  If Boehner has looked into the incident and said that his colleague made a mistake more than a decade prior, I will certainly show deference to someone who knows and works with Scalise personally. 

What has struck me about the American media coverage I’ve been able to catch is that many are eager to paint the GOP as racist with a broad brush without any measure of perspective or introspection.  Scalise offered his contrition that he had made a mistake and apologized for appearing before a group some 12 years ago.  And yet The Washington Post’s Dan Balz was quite eager to remind his readers that: “The Scalise episode…is more than a case of one politician and one event.  It is also a reminder of the complexities of race and politics in the Old and New South as that region has made a long transition from one-party Democratic rule a generation ago to today’s one-party Republican dominance.”  

As I reflected upon Balz’s words, I couldn’t help but remember another politician embroiled in his association with someone with not only with a racist past but one who continued to preach racism from the pews to the present day.  A politician who attended the congregation at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago for some 20 years, a man who referred to his Pastor as his second father—a Pastor who officiated his wedding and baptized his children. 

Yes, I’m referring to the association between Barack Obama and his since disavowed Pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright.  What I find ironic is that Scalise is being excoriated for one speech before one group in which the gentleman in question professed no knowledge of white supremacist ties—while the current occupant of the Oval Office had to have known about the racist invective Pastor Wright issued from his pulpit each Sunday.

Have you ever heard of the “Black Value System” adopted by the Trinity Church in 1981, some seven years before President Obama joined their congregation? Chances are you haven’t, as I hadn’t either.  Scrolling through this hate-filled manifesto for the first time made the hairs on my arm tingle with discomfort.  There is reference after reference to the “black community,” “black worth ethic,” and adherence to the “black value system.”

Can you imagine the outrage if Representative Scalise had spoken before a group in Louisiana whose attendees vowed fealty to a “white value system?”  

Calls for his resignation and an investigation from the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice would have been swift and immediately forthcoming.

Again, I do not know House Majority Whip Scalise or President Obama personally.  What I do know is that for the media to dismiss our President’s 20-year association with a racist pastor, while expressing moral outrage over one speech given 12 years ago before a group Scalise claims he knew little about, reeks of rank hypocrisy by a Pretorian Guard interested in protecting Obama at all costs while tearing down Scalise for what appears to be an honest and genuine mistake.  How far the media have fallen. 

http://www.thedailybeast.com/a...se-than-scalise.html

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Good luck, the liberals will be here soon to make it all about Bundy or something else to deflect. This is no secret at all. The left is as racist as they come, and they don't come any more racist than the obamas. The lefties know this, but it doesn't stop them from yelling 'racist' at everyone else. We all know it's not just wright's racism they've ignored.

Well, Gun-Runner, you somehow must have missed the unremitting tirades of outrage that were launched against Obama and Wright back when the "Jeremiah Wright Scandal" was making big headlines.

 

But true to right-wing form, you are taking the same tack that those of your ilk typically take when something unseemly is revealed about a conservative legislator (or preacher or celebrity).  Here is your strategy:  Find someone or something worse--or that you consider worse--with which you can brand the "other side."  Never mind whether it is current or timely; anything from past or present will do.  Then go to great lengths to argue that the sins on the "other side" are just as bad as or worse than those of the winger sinner currently in the spotlight.  The intent is, of course, to dilute the effectiveness of the legitimate criticism of someone of your own political persuasion. It probably works on 99 percent of those who already have their minds made up anyway.

 

Case in point: Trent Lott's high praise of South Carolina's state fossil, Strom  Thurmond.  Lott wistfully lamented Thurmond's failed bid for the Presidency in 1948.  Thurmond ran on the arch-segregationist "Dixiecrat" ticket, whose platform unapologetically affirmed that, "We stand for the segregation of the races...." Lott proclaimed that this country would be in much better shape today if Thurmond had won the Presidency.  He said precisely this:  ""When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over the years, either."  Lott was predictably scorned for that patently racist utterance and forced out of his position as Senate Majority Leader.  His die-hard supporters were quick to reach back into some distant history of their own and remind us--boringly, once again--that a long-dead Democrat, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, had been a member of the Ku Klux Klan in his youth.

 

Black indeed had once been in the KKK, but later, in his role as an Associate Justice, became an ardent champion of minority rights.  Lott's bigotry surfaced in the here and now of 2002, decades past the time when any honorable national leader would have claimed pridefully to have voted for an egregiously segregationist candidate for President. But never mind that.  The right-wingers still have their shovels at the ready, ever ready to exhume Hugo Black's Klan membership as some kind of alleged defense against any current racist association or utterance of some conservative politician.

 

Jeremiah Wright is an odious person.  That does not make Congressman Scalisi's past racist associations any less odious.   Either he was astonishingly naive in appearing before David Duke's racist forum or he was sympathetic to its purposes and goals.  It looks bad either way.

 

 

Originally Posted by Contendah:

Well, Gun-Runner, you somehow must have missed the unremitting tirades of outrage that were launched against Obama and Wright back when the "Jeremiah Wright Scandal" was making big headlines.

 

But true to right-wing form, you are taking the same tack that those of your ilk typically take when something unseemly is revealed about a conservative legislator (or preacher or celebrity).  Here is your strategy:  Find someone or something worse--or that you consider worse--with which you can brand the "other side."  Never mind whether it is current or timely; anything from past or present will do.  Then go to great lengths to argue that the sins on the "other side" are just as bad as or worse than those of the winger sinner currently in the spotlight.  The intent is, of course, to dilute the effectiveness of the legitimate criticism of someone of your own political persuasion. It probably works on 99 percent of those who already have their minds made up anyway.

 

Case in point: Trent Lott's high praise of South Carolina's state fossil, Strom  Thurmond.  Lott wistfully lamented Thurmond's failed bid for the Presidency in 1948.  Thurmond ran on the arch-segregationist "Dixiecrat" ticket, whose platform unapologetically affirmed that, "We stand for the segregation of the races...." Lott proclaimed that this country would be in much better shape today if Thurmond had won the Presidency.  He said precisely this:  ""When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over the years, either."  Lott was predictably scorned for that patently racist utterance and forced out of his position as Senate Majority Leader.  His die-hard supporters were quick to reach back into some distant history of their own and remind us--boringly, once again--that a long-dead Democrat, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, had been a member of the Ku Klux Klan in his youth.

 

Black indeed had once been in the KKK, but later, in his role as an Associate Justice, became an ardent champion of minority rights.  Lott's bigotry surfaced in the here and now of 2002, decades past the time when any honorable national leader would have claimed pridefully to have voted for an egregiously segregationist candidate for President. But never mind that.  The right-wingers still have their shovels at the ready, ever ready to exhume Hugo Black's Klan membership as some kind of alleged defense against any current racist association or utterance of some conservative politician.

 

Jeremiah Wright is an odious person.  That does not make Congressman Scalisi's past racist associations any less odious.   Either he was astonishingly naive in appearing before David Duke's racist forum or he was sympathetic to its purposes and goals.  It looks bad either way.

 

 

Thank You for your response and input.

 

I believe, by your response,that you are an educated person, however , the tag of "being true to form" of a right winger, that you have bestowed on me is one of judgmental error.

I neither follow the right or left.

My post was not to incite, but rather to show the pitfalls of following, blindly, either Party.

I apologize if you are offended.

 

Another one they never liked to talk about.

 

In the early 1940s, Byrd recruited 150 of his friends and associates to create a new chapter of the Ku Klux Klan in Sophia, West Virginia.[12][11]

According to Byrd, a Klan official told him, "You have a talent for leadership, Bob ... The country needs young men like you in the leadership of the nation." Byrd later recalled, "Suddenly lights flashed in my mind! Someone important had recognized my abilities! I was only 23 or 24 years old, and the thought of a political career had never really hit me. But strike me that night, it did."[12] Byrd became a recruiter and leader of his chapter.[12] When it came time to elect the top officer (Exalted Cyclops) in the local Klan unit, Byrd won unanimously.

In 1946, Byrd wrote to segregationist Mississippi Senator Theodore G. Bilbo:[17]

I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.

—Robert C. Byrd, in a letter to Sen. Theodore Bilbo (D-MS), 1946[12][18][19]

In 1946, Byrd wrote a letter to a Grand Wizard stating, "The Klan is needed today as never before, and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia and in every state in the nation."[20] However, when running for the United States House of Representatives in 1952, he announced "After about a year, I became disinterested, quit paying my dues, and dropped my membership in the organization. During the nine years that have followed, I have never been interested in the Klan." He said he had joined the Klan because he felt it offered excitement and was anti-communist.[12] But Byrd's friend and fellow Klansman Democratic Senator Theodore G. Bilbo told Meet the Press, "No man can leave the Klan. He takes an oath not to do that. Once a Ku Klux, always a Ku Klux."[21] Byrd never provided any corroboration for his claim to have quit.

 

Robert Carlyle Byrd (born Cornelius Calvin Sale, Jr.; November 20, 1917 – June 28, 2010) was a United States Senator from West Virginia. A member of the Democratic Party, 

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by budsfarm:

 

 

Best, you're going to have to give Contendah time to catch his breath from the blow dealt him by Gunrunner's polite response. 

Thank You.

 

I wish no harm on anyone. 

I welcome civil dialect.

This Country is shattering.

We need to strike an accord. 

The Parties do not care, either way.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

I wish no harm on anyone. 

I welcome civil dialect.

This Country is shattering.

We need to strike an accord. 

The Parties do not care, either way.

 

If you have no party, feel no party cares, who do you wish to "get along" with?

 

 

My fellow HUMANS.

After all, we are the ones who live on this small orb.

They are both POS racist. Now, why do public figures do these things? Why is race still such a big issue? It's because we live in a racist country and they are doing and saying what they know their constituents want to hear. They are appearing at gatherings where those that vote for them attend. What does that mean and what does that tell us about America in general?

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

My fellow HUMANS.

After all, we are the ones who live on this small orb.

 -------------------------------------------------

Good luck with that. As I just posted elsewhere, fewer and fewer feel the same.

 

 

I know.

I have Children, and Grand Children.

I have made it.

I fear for them.

 

Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:

do the regressives of today not realize the 'democrats' of the 1940s (conservative democrats) are republicans, now?

FDR was a conservative -- now tell me a taller tale.

___________

i've shown you those facts in at least two other threads. did you not read them, then?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×