Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Rated a fake news site spreading propaganda for the left.

 

Bias: Extreme Left

Notes: Resistance Report is a news and opinion blog/website with an extreme left wing bias. Headlines contain loaded words and are sensational. News reporting is also filled with emotional language that favors the left. Most articles are sourced, but many are sourced to far left or questionable sources. Resistance Report also has a Pants on Fire rating from Politifact.

Last edited by Bestworking
jtdavis posted:

Kraven and Best, keep calling it fake news and exclaiming how you didn't read it to see what was in it.

Jt, it IS fake news, and I didn't read it when I saw the name in the link, and I don't care if you believe it or not. I don't click on those sites, you never know what you'll get. You mook, your mouse got you on this one. But I do wonder why all of a sudden you knew how to post the link. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm. If you don't like what PolitiFact said about it, email them and complain.

 

Last edited by Bestworking

Typical of the left, false conclusion. The headline reads as if the senator were paid to oppose the Paris accord.  The donations were from 1994, forward.  Unless, Exxon has a time machine, the proposal that the funds were simply to influence the senators against the Paris accord is false on the face of it.  Then, there's Rex Tillerson, secretary of state, once CEO of ExxonMobil, who reportedly was in favor of the accord. 

The left has gone full on crazy over this. MSM proves, once more, there is no objectivity left amongst their trained monkeys.. OK, OK, I apologize to monkeys for the comparison.  

PolitiFact.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
PolitiFact.com
PolitiFact logo.svg
Available inEnglish
OwnerTampa Bay Times
Slogan(s)Sorting out the truth in politics
Websitewww.politifact.com
Alexa rankIncrease 4,987 (October 2016)[1]
CommercialYes
Launched2007; 10 years ago
Current statusActive

PolitiFact.com is a project operated by the Tampa Bay Times, in which reporters and editors from the Times and affiliated media fact check statements by members of Congress, the White House, lobbyists, and interest groups.[2] They publish original statements and their evaluations on the PolitiFact.com website, and assign each a "Truth-O-Meter" rating. The ratings range from "True" for completely accurate statements to "Pants on Fire" (from the taunt "Liar, liar, pants on fire") for false and ridiculous claims. PunditFact, which is also operated by the Times' editors, is devoted to fact-checking claims made by political pundits.[3] Both PolitiFact and PunditFact are funded primarily by the Tampa Bay Times and ad revenues generated on the website. They also rely on grants from several nonpartisan organizations, and in 2017 launched a membership campaign and began accepting donations from readers.[4]

direstraits posted:

Typical of the left, false conclusion. The headline reads as if the senator were paid to oppose the Paris accord.  The donations were from 1994, forward.  Unless, Exxon has a time machine, the proposal that the funds were simply to influence the senators against the Paris accord is false on the face of it.  Then, there's Rex Tillerson, secretary of state, once CEO of ExxonMobil, who reportedly was in favor of the accord. 

The left has gone full on crazy over this. MSM proves, once more, there is no objectivity left amongst their trained monkeys.. OK, OK, I apologize to monkeys for the comparison.  

Old jt got "took" by the mouse in his pocket.

jtdavis posted:

Kraven and Best, keep calling it fake news and exclaiming how you didn't read it to see what was in it.

I know how you feel JT, years ago I would pickup a Playboy
magazine because I knew there were interesting articles
to read, same thing. At times, URL's can hint about the type
article inside.
  1. Kraven posted:
    jtdavis posted:

    Kraven and Best, keep calling it fake news and exclaiming how you didn't read it to see what was in it.

    I know how you feel JT, years ago I would pickup a Playboy
    magazine because I knew there were interesting articles
    to read, same thing. At times, URL's can hint about the type
    article inside.

    What makes Jt think any Republican would click on a link posted by a rabid liberal like him, and titled "resistance report"? Really Jt?

Looks like London is at it again tonight and I think, Stupid liberals.
Why would any country want that every time you turn around.
 
If European countries can't protect themselves, why do they
silly games, why do they bother, give your country to them
and get it over with, you don't deserve the ownership.
 
Or arm the citizens and join them to the entire British military
and do what needs to be done.
 
Last edited by Kraven
Kraven posted:
Looks like London is at it again tonight and I think, Stupid liberals.
Why would any country want that every time you turn around.
 
If European countries can't protect themselves, why do they
silly games, why do they bother, give your country to them
and get it over with, you don't deserve the ownership.
 
Or arm the citizens and join them to the entire British military
and do what needs to be done.
 

15 years or more ago people in England were warning the US about letting the muzzies get a foothold here as they had done there. Not very many heeded the warning. Of course that was before the demoslops put a muzzie in the WH.

Congratulations on posting your first link, JT.  Kinda like losing your virginity for the.... uh....well, whatever time.  Don't be discouraged that your first attempt was a bust.  Unfortunately, most of the liberal sites out there are a bust, but you'll just have to navigate that mine field on your on.  Other liberals will offer you advice on which path to take but being an ol Army guy like you, you know the  liberal way is always mined.

As for me, I look forward to reading the sources of some of those ridiculous assertions you have made in the past especially regarding law enforcement use of force and grand jury findings.  Won't we have fun being on the same page, same site.  But if you can't find them, no harm done.  All the accused have been exonerated so your libtard sources, I presume, have all dried up.  And no longer will you have to rely on your faulty memory regarding Second Amendment rights.  You'll have Google to remember and your ability to post links to speak for you.  I know how hard that can be after watching several liberals fall early victims to chronic CRS. 

Welcome, once again, neighbor.  And as a housewarming gift, let me present you with a link to an old friend...remember our discussion about riots, arson, looting, and murder and you wanted to send out water hoses?  Sure you do.  Here's something else you remember . . .

https://www.army.mil/values/oath.html

I, J T Davis do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

You remember that JT, right.  Now there are folks on this forum presenting themselves to be acting in your behalf whose only experience with a oath like that was a fraternity pledge and in military terms, haven't a clue what support and defends means much less the difference between foreign and domestic enemies.  As deep as their obligation dare go beyond their life's experiences.  Not that their fraternity experience at our State's college wasn't a fine one.  it's not that they are stupid, it's just that they haven't allowed their mind to be liberal enough to take in those ideas contrary to their beliefs to be free.  Brain freeze.

But JT, when it comes to anarchist and homegrown terrorist rioting in out streets, burning and looting our neighbors businesses and murdering our citizens, it is time to honor that oath you took  to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;  and quit p*u*s*s*y*footing around and you know if it was happening in your neighborhood, water hose ain't gonna cut it, dude.

You're a former blue collar, middle class worker.  You're a vet.  This is your time.  The stars are aligned just for you.  Others saw the light, JT, construction workers just like you, more like you.  Unless you snatch defeat from the jaws of victory this time is yours.

But if on the other hand, you swing the other way and join with others as with Crash's recommendation [but lacking real man courage, not his physical presence ] that their hood come after me - burn mine, steal from me -  you will be greeted with the ultimate  fulfillment of the understanding of the Oath as I took it.  And I will derive great humor in it.  Heck, I'm smiling already.  And you know it.

Use your new found knowledge wisely, gr*****pper.

 

direstraits posted:

Typical of the left, false conclusion. The headline reads as if the senator were paid to oppose the Paris accord.  The donations were from 1994, forward.  Unless, Exxon has a time machine, the proposal that the funds were simply to influence the senators against the Paris accord is false on the face of it.  Then, there's Rex Tillerson, secretary of state, once CEO of ExxonMobil, who reportedly was in favor of the accord. 

The left has gone full on crazy over this. MSM proves, once more, there is no objectivity left amongst their trained monkeys.. OK, OK, I apologize to monkeys for the comparison.  

I think that human evolution reached it's peak about 30 years ago and now we're in reverse.

Bud, for many years and still yet, my main concern was providing for my family. I had a stay at home wife who was a full time mother and is a full time grandmother. If we got it, I had to earn it. As yet, I have not saw the republicans pass legislation that helped the working class.  I'm not satisfied with the democrat parties direction today either.

PS   I didn't get any of those gimme thats either

Last edited by jtdavis

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×