Originally Posted by jtdavis:
I too deplore something. I deplore the use of the term "destroyed" within a context where it plainly does not fit. Rice will, at some time, return to the NFL , after he has taken his medicine--which should be pretty strong medicine. But his life will not be "destroyed."
Michael Vick did not have his life or his football career "destroyed" on account of his dog fighting conviction and incarceration. The numerous suspensions of pro athletes for use of illegal drugs has not "destroyed" their lives. They generally get some time off without pay and then get back in the game, earning BIG bucks again. "Destruction"? I think not.
Contendah, you know a lot about a lot of things, but not about sports figures. Vick spent several months in jail and the real cost to him was probably over 100 million dollars. Is that about right for abusing dogs? Rice is going to be suspended from football for at least a year. His cost is going to exceed 10 million dollars. The legal charges have already been settled. Is this the correct penalty for him? If the judge, in either case, would have fined them that much, it would have been thrown out by the appeal.
___
You still have not addressed the "destroyed" element of your original contention. Vick is back in business, earning big bucks and Ray Rice most likely will be "rehabilitated" and return to popularity and prosperity. "Destroyed" does not fit those scenarios.
And these athletes knew when they entered the NFL that the league had the power to hold them accountable above and beyond what the law might prescribe as punishment. Their very lucrative contracts acknowledge the league's and the teams'requiirements.
All you muscled-up, over-paid, idolized jocks out there, HEAR THIS: Do not beat your woman and you won't get into the kind of trouble that Ray Rice has brought upon himself.