Skip to main content

Obama is in a position where he has to decide whether or not to put his kids in public school or private school. Interesting situation. Our first black president might have to put his kids in a private school because of the social makeup of D.C. and the poor school systems. No matter what he does he'll be criticized.

The only choice is what is best for the kids which is of course a private school. The teachers unions might not like it and he'll loose a little favor in the black community for not wanting to put his kids in failing predominantly black school but in the end his kid's safety and education is the number one priority.

Too bad the rest of us are stuck with public schools or paying school taxes in addition to private school costs. Wouldn't a voucher program be fair? You won't see that under a democrat administration. I say the Gov. should let us keep our money and decide. Obama says big brother knows best. The pigs walk like people and sleep in beds now. Didn't see that coming did you?
Last edited {1}
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

He will do like Clinton did and say that security is easier to maintain at the private school.

If the public schools in DC suck, only Congress can be blamed.

The voucher program in theory would be fair, but it would probably be mismanaged even worse than many public school systems. Also, the paperwork created by the government would probably close most private schools down.
quote:
Originally posted by smurph:
you don't really expect him to answer do ya?


JJ is googling like a wild monkey right now trying to find an answer. However, I believe that Obama's role as a parent trumps that of President in this instance. Besides, the Secret Service would have conniptions if the girls were sent to public school. It would be almost impossible to protect them. And regardless of how one might feel about Obama, his daughters should be left alone.
quote:
JJ is googling like a wild monkey right now trying to find an answer. However, I believe that Obama's role as a parent trumps that of President in this instance. Besides, the Secret Service would have conniptions if the girls were sent to public school. It would be almost impossible to protect them. And regardless of how one might feel about Obama, his daughters should be left alone


I agree entirely.But you know this has got to be a b**** for JJ though.Either agree with us "evil conservative hate mongers" or disagree with his chosen one.Still waiting JJ.
quote:
Originally posted by zippadeedoodah:
quote:
Originally posted by smurph:
you don't really expect him to answer do ya?


JJ is googling like a wild monkey right now trying to find an answer. However, I believe that Obama's role as a parent trumps that of President in this instance. Besides, the Secret Service would have conniptions if the girls were sent to public school. It would be almost impossible to protect them. And regardless of how one might feel about Obama, his daughters should be left alone.




''JJ is googling like a wild monkey right now trying to find an answer.''

Not everybody does as you do.


If the rich can afford private schools for their kids more power to them. I do not think tax payers should pay for rich kids to go to a Private School when it is our Public Schools that need the money.
I know I've posted this before but, I think they should homeschool the kids with Bill Ayers as a tutor. He IS a well respected professor in the education field. What does it matter that he's still a praticing socialist/communist?

De Nile is a river in Egypt, not a state to live in.

ONLY 1450 DAYS UNTIL THE NEXT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
quote:
Originally posted by 44Magnum:
quote:
JJ is googling like a wild monkey right now trying to find an answer. However, I believe that Obama's role as a parent trumps that of President in this instance. Besides, the Secret Service would have conniptions if the girls were sent to public school. It would be almost impossible to protect them. And regardless of how one might feel about Obama, his daughters should be left alone


I agree entirely.But you know this has got to be a b**** for JJ though.Either agree with us "evil conservative hate mongers" or disagree with his chosen one.Still waiting JJ.




I don't attack you when you disagree with me or when you post something, like you idiots from the right wing do to me. Most of you don't know any better and you come out as to what you really are, BACKWARD REDNECK.
quote:
Originally posted by smurph:
quote:
I don't attack you when you disagree with me or when you post something, like you idiots from the right wing do to me. Most of you don't know any better and you come out as to what you really are, BACKWARD REDNECK.


jj with his name calling literary expertise


The internet gives limp wristed twits the opportunity to say things to people that, if said to their faces, would result in...interesting consequences. Again, JJ, stick to cutting and pasting the thoughts of those who are more intellectually gifted than you. Unlike you, I've never changed my screen name. And I recall being called a "thug" in response to one of my earliest posts. To suggest you remember that is ludicrous as you and I will never meet face to face, at least with you admitting your online identity. But when you go into one of your infantile, name-calling rants, you simply confirm my long-standing belief that libtards such as yourself have minds like steel traps...tenuously open whenever conditions permit, but ready to snap shut at the first outside influence. By the way, that was NOT a compliment.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×