Skip to main content

The link below describes coming scientific efforts to clone the extinct woolly mammoth.  Right wingers, all of whom wistfully contemplate the Reagan era and lament the lack of any living candidate who is anywhere close to the Reagan ideals of trickling down and sleeping in cabinet meetings, take hope!

 

These skilled scientists have a proven track record in the realm of animal cloning.  Is this perhaps just one step away from cloning of humans?  If a woolly mammoth can be cloned from tissue that is thousands of years old, could not some cellular material from the Gipper be found with which to clone up an exact genetic duplicate?  Then, with guidance from such operatives as Karl Rove, Roger Ailes, and Grover Norquist, the 21st Century Reagan clone could be carefully  guided and educated to become a Reagan who would out-Reagan Reagan himself.  Reagan Redux would be steered away from any early associations with the liberal causes that the Gipper once contaminated himself with.  Thus, in the prime of his life, he would be ready for anointing as the Conservative to End All Conservatives and thrust upon the political stage all primed to energetically peddle the same old tired proverbs and flawed doctrines espoused by his genetic predecessor.

 

Of course Nancy Reagan's permission would be required before the parent cells could be harvested.  Assuming her astrologer approves, she should be willing. 

 

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.u...campaign=daily_brief

I yam what I yam and that's all I yam--but it is enough!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

No matter, ended runaway inflation, which neither Ford, Nixon, nor Carter could rein in. Then, got us out of the mess Carter drove the economy into. While driving down the unemployment rate.  If Voodoo, then pass the wax dolls and the pins.  My family in NOLA has a mama macoute, who works for them.  As an economic advisor, she couldn't be any worst than Obama's present lot.

There have been several attempts thus far to clone both Harry Reid and Pelosi.  Mentally the clones function pretty normally, but they ain't much to look at.....acording to scientists who were interviewed after the procedure, this was the best they could do considering what they had to work with....some of the more intelligent scientists think that may have actually improved upon the models....time will tell....

 

wvpic

Attachments

Images (1)
  • wvpic

I find it quite humorous that all you can find to insult about Democratic women are their LOOKS, and yet you get all in a huff when we make fun of the MINDS (or lack of them) of some of these Republican women like Palin and Bachman.

 

I'd much rather see a homely woman with intelligence in office than an airheaded Barbie Doll. But I guess one has to HAVE a mind to begin with in order to see WHY.

Originally Posted by teyates:

There have been several attempts thus far to clone both Harry Reid and Pelosi.  Mentally the clones function pretty normally, but they ain't much to look at.....acording to scientists who were interviewed after the procedure, this was the best they could do considering what they had to work with....some of the more intelligent scientists think that may have actually improved upon the models....time will tell....

 

wvpic

___

 

Teyates, we know you are justly proud of all your close relatives, but the forum is not the place to use for putting up their pictures.

If Ugly gets extra points, Janet Reno, Hillary Clinton and Eleanor Roosevelt should be very near the top. 

Those with beauty have always been condemned as lacking intelligence, by those lacking beauty. Beauty is visual and obvious,  hard to fake. Brilliance on the other hand is often concealed. and Nancy Pelosi has achieved total concealment, and is closely followed by Ms. Reno and Ms. Clinton.

I have never understood why libs didn't like Condoleezza Rice, Black, Brilliant, and to many Beauty.

In fact in the photos below of demorat women Michelle and Madeline Albright may be the only women displayed who'e have shown brilliants over their beauty and that's scary..

1demwo

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1demwo

But Teddy & Andy were achievers and knew not the word fear, and like Slick Willie they really new how to have a good time, maybe Slicks only good quality, outside of Jennifer Flowers he had a poor eye for selection, seems all the females he culled would fit in a phone booth and not touch. A real quantity and not quality guy.

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by teyates:

There have been several attempts thus far to clone both Harry Reid and Pelosi.  Mentally the clones function pretty normally, but they ain't much to look at.....acording to scientists who were interviewed after the procedure, this was the best they could do considering what they had to work with....some of the more intelligent scientists think that may have actually improved upon the models....time will tell....

 

wvpic

___

 

Teyates, we know you are justly proud of all your close relatives, but the forum is not the place to use for putting up their pictures.

Yes....I must apologize.  I got this picture from the local paper.  It is supposedly two of the only local people known to have succumbed to the Amish Heater "Scam".  My relatives don't have nearly this much hair, and with all of the inbreeding they have lost the ability to drool.  They do however, know a goo dbit about heating and air conditioning and good probably teach a few things to the local weak minded individuals who lost money on such ventures.  Common sense is a scarce commodity with those folks.

Originally Posted by interventor1212:

Former Italian President Berlusconi, known for his dalliances with pretty young women, and former and late leader of Libya, Qaddafi, known for his large bodyguard of bodacious babes, had a thang for Condi Rice.

 

Personally, if a guy doesn't find her attractive, he's either a hard core racist, or sets off gaidar.

 

 

rice_boots

condi02

condi02

rice_boots

 

I agree. She's a beautiful woman. I've seen many on here say she's fat and others say she's ugly. I disagree. 

 

 

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cu...aughs-231917424.html

Originally Posted by FatRat:

If Ugly gets extra points, Janet Reno, Hillary Clinton and Eleanor Roosevelt should be very near the top. 

Those with beauty have always been condemned as lacking intelligence, by those lacking beauty. Beauty is visual and obvious,  hard to fake. Brilliance on the other hand is often concealed. and Nancy Pelosi has achieved total concealment, and is closely followed by Ms. Reno and Ms. Clinton.

I have never understood why libs didn't like Condoleezza Rice, Black, Brilliant, and to many Beauty.

In fact in the photos below of demorat women Michelle and Madeline Albright may be the only women displayed who'e have shown brilliants over their beauty and that's scary..

1demwo

 

 

And God said, "Choose brains or beauty -- can't have both."

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×