Documentation Validating Steve Quayle's Claims Regarding the UN's FEMA Camp Intentions for America

 

fm 39.4

Recently, I interviewed Steve Quayle regarding UN troops on American soil in large numbers, Marine Corps call-ups and the UN manning FEMA camps. I have already received some "hate mail" saying that this cannot possible be true. In the words of Steve, some will remain a DUD (Dumb Until Dead). In a short 51 minutes, Steve Quayle highlighted more improtant topics related to the coming FEMA camp incarcerations that I thought possible in that time frame. In the near future, I am dedicating some fo the space from my website to investigate how far Steve Quayles' claims can be taken. How deep does the threat run? We are going to find out.

No Matter How Strong the Evidence, There Are Some That Will Never Believe

There are some that have eyes to see, but refuse to do so. These people suffer from a common disorder called cognitive dissonance. 

The social media and the mainstream media are spending an inordinate amount of money, time and effort in attempting to control the narrative. Yet, nothing that these groups do is as effective good ole fashioned cognitive dissonance resulting in learned helplessness.

 

learned helplessness 99

Why are so many Americans simply giving in to the suspension of our Constitution and the widespread criminality among our leaders (ie Clinton)? There is a set of psychological reasons why our people, even those that are seemingly more awake than most, would accept this latest tyranny from their government. We know about cognitive dissonance which prevents people from seeing the totality of a threat and thus inhibiting their personal ability to make the paradigm shift needed to accurately perceive the threat. We also know about bystander apathy which stands as an obstacle to getting involved because in this large country, “someone else will do it”. And there is a third psychological reason which prevents us from getting involved because we have been conditioned that our actions cannot make any difference which is reflective of a condition called, learned helplessness.

For the psychological reasons listed above, many Americans are still in denial about the existence and true nature of concentration camps in America,commonly known as FEMA camps. The evidence is overwhelming and from certain documents we can ascertain how “detainees” will be captured and transported to these infamous FEMA camps. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate, that from the government’s own documents, it is child’s play to demonstrate the nature of FEMA camps in terms of who is going to be running these camps.

An Irrelevant Question

  We often hear the question: “Will American soldiers fire upon American citizens upon a martial law roundup of millions of Americans”? The answer to that question is a moot point. It is clear from analyzing data from Army concentration camp materials, that American soldiers will be used  to round up detainees. However, the camps in which people will be deported to will ultimately be staffed and run by foreign troops. This document will make this point abundantly clear.

For those who afflicted with the psychological conditions listed in the previous paragraphs, I have some very bad news. FEMA CAMPS ARE REAL AND THE CONCLUSIVE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE CAMPS IS CHILD'S PLAY!!!

FEMA Camps Are Slave Labor Camps

As was the case with the ****S, slave labor will be a part of the landscape as evidenced by the following Army document which is often referred to FM 39.4. It tells the reader all they need to know. 

Let's get right to the heart of some of what Steve Quayle was saying in my interview with him. A FEMA camp can be both a slave labor camp and an extermination center as on can see from an excerpt from the FM 39.4 document: 

Appendix J

J-20 FM 3-39.40 12 February 2010

J-67.

Commanders must organize and manage detainees in such a manner as to permit the proper and ready employment of each detainee. Establish and maintain a current occupational skill record for each detainee. Include new skills as they are acquired.

Assigning individual detainees to a work detail or job on a regular or permanent basis.

Establishing vocational training projects and encouraging detainees to study and develop needed skills to the maximum extent possible.

LABOR CONSIDERATIONS

J-68.

Detainee labor may be used to perform the following:

Camp administration and installation maintenance.

Agricultural work.

Public works, public utilities, and building operations that have no military character or purpose.

Transportation and handling of stores that are not military in nature or purpose.

Domestic service

Unanswered Questions

From the perspective of history, concentration camps are notoriously known for being institutions of murder. Based on this notion, I scoured the Army concentration camp manual entitled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations (PDF), and found only scant reference to the subject of deaths in the concentration camps. Now wait a minute, this document painstakingly describes interrogation processes, food preparation, the transport and care of detainees, but they barely mention how they are going to deal with dead bodies? In a facility filled with a divergent population with regard to age, health status and physical conditioning, should the authorities be concerned with what happens when an inmate dies from an unexpected heart attack or stroke? What would they do with the dead bodies? If proper preparations are not taken for the proper care and disposal of dead bodies, wouldn’t that imperil the health of fellow inmates, not to mention the guards and other military personnel? This should be a primary concern for any facility. However, this is the one area where the FEMA camp Army manual is relatively silent. The following passages speaks to how the Army deals with the subject of death as it is related to the concentration camps:

5-69. When a detainee in U.S. custody dies, the attending medical officer will immediately furnish the detention facility commander or hospital commander (or the commander of the unit that exercised custody over the detainee if the death did not occur in a facility) with the— -Detainee’s full name. -Detainee’s ISN/capture tag (mandatory). -Date, place, and circumstances of the detainee’s death. -Initial assessment as to whether the detainee’s death was, or was not, the result of the deceased’s own misconduct. -The initial assessment as to the cause of death.
 

  What is interesting about 5-69 is the cause of death is not categorized in any meaningful manner except to say that there is a conscious effort to determine if the death of the inmate was due to “their own actions”.

5-72. …the Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner is responsible for completing a final DD Form 2064 that will include a statement that “death was (or was not) the result of the deceased’s own misconduct” in the block labeled “Circumstances Surrounding Death Due to External Causes.”

Notice in the above (5-72) that only meaningful categories of inmate death are (1) the detainee’s own misconduct and (2) death due to external causes.

5-73. The NRDC will notify the ICRC of all detainee deaths. The NDRC will maintain detainee DD Forms 2064 for the period of hostilities or occupation, for the duration of any other military operation, or as otherwise directed. When authorized, the NDRC will archive detainee DD Forms 2064.

There is a key phrase that barely goes unnoticed. the phrase is “The NDRC will maintain detainee DD Forms 2064 for the period of the hostilities or occupation…”  In other words, there will be no Nuremberg trials for genocide because the records will be not be permanently maintained (i.e. destroyed).

It’s What They Are Not Saying That Is Worrisome, It Is What They Are Not Saying

For a manual which spells out, in detail, every possible consideration of how detainees will be handled, they omit the disposal of dead bodies. Will there be a military regulation that nobody can drop dead in the camp of a heart attack? Or, is this because except for the occasional spontaneous death, the Army seems very unconcerned about disposing of dead bodies at a facility of mass detention? I can only come to one conclusion, most of the deaths associated with the detainees, will not occur at the facility itself and this explains why the Army is seemingly unconcerned with this issue.  This opens a whole host of possibilities. Are the unhealthy going to be transported to a tertiary facility to be humanely treated while their medical conditions will be treated? I think it is fairly easy to see where I am going with this. Can we really expect the “authorities” who have committed an inhumane act by incarcerating people for no legitimate reason to suddenly discover their conscience and treat the infirm with compassion and dignity?

In the interview, Steve Quayle stated that crematoriums are located in some of the camps. Does this answer the question posed in the preceeding paragraphs? It would appear so. In subsequent articles, this topic and other related topics will be explored. To those that have a chronic and severe case of cogntive dissonance, these facts, which cannot be denied will come as a shock to the system. I apologize for that. However, there is something that one can do today. Pray, pray for deliverance from the encroaching evil that is enveloping the planet. Stay tuned, there is more to come.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=...4583A4D929391E7BC953

America is Still Free to a Fault

Original Post

Add Reply

Likes (0)
Post

×
×
×
×