Careful what you decry and dismiss as I too easily believe there is enough wisdom and sanity in the greater part of America to beat back such a challenge based upon Constitutional provisions.  What concerns me is as the Judicial branch becomes more and more infiltrated with highly liberal justices there could come a point that a highly biased and liberal Supreme Court would just make a ruling of interpretation that in essence accomplishes the same thing without the process described in this thread.  I fully believe in Obama and an expected Hillary presidency plans were to accomplish something akin to that.  Why else purchase such large amounts of ammo and supplies for governmental departments that have no reason to have such arsonals at their disposal? 

GBRK

I fully believe in Obama and an expected Hillary presidency plans were to accomplish something akin to that.  Why else purchase such large amounts of ammo and supplies for governmental departments that have no reason to have such arsonals at their disposal? 

-------

Glad someone else said something about the ground plan being
laid, all they needed was a Helda win.
That doesn't mean they've stopped driving toward that end.
with the school shooting (they really don't care kids died), it
has given them an excuse to push out the 2nd amendment.
The students are turning out to be good little slaves.
 
It's time Trump did something about people like G. Soros.

 

 

I can't find one time where Obama took any guns, after I had to listen to the whines of the Republicans for 8 years. Republicans are in full control and are still whining about 'they're gonna take our guns'... who? The Republicans?
At some point, common sense has to enter into the Republican mind... We've been waiting for the past 20 years and have seen no progress on the situation, yet.

The NRA is a shill for the Gun Manufactures and Republicans can't send them money fast enough for the privilege of being allowed to buy their guns. Then NRA is a non-profit org and spends a ridiculous amount of money on lobbying Congress to get their way. If only there were laws preventing such from happening.

Don't forget the Social Security Administration reporting that persons who had someone help with their finances were incompetent and shouldn't own firearms.  Bypassed the courts to deny a civil right.  Idiot left wing (yes, that's redundant) reported that Trump ending that mean all mentally incompetents were allowed firearms.  And, shills and useful idiots parroted that.

Br’er Rabbit posted:

So, Stanky tried to post an 'Obama Law' that took guns.. and then posted where the law didn't go into effect. Thus, Obama took no guns. Republicans have a hard time recognizing reality, now days.

 

VA medical information is used to block veterans from possessing firearms:

The Daily Caller obtained a “MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AND THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION REGARDING THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.”

The document, dated Feb. 27, 2012, makes clear the VA must send health information to the FBI for its gun background-check database.

“VA will provide an encrypted compact disc exchanged via mail to the FBI no less than quarterly for, inter alia, inclusion in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS),” the memo reads.

The memo defines the NICS database as a list of “persons prohibited under federal law from receiving or possessing firearms.”

“Data disclosed by VA to the FBI under the terms of this agreement is to be entered into the NICS Index…”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04...eir-guns-taken-away/

 

I believe that Ol'bama was the chief executive of the country at the time and  therefore in charge of running the FBI and VA. I believe that during the reign of King Ol'bama that over 250,000 vets were deprived of their rights without a proper court hearing; so yes, Ol'bama is responsible for taking people's rights.

Stanky posted:
Br’er Rabbit posted:

So, Stanky tried to post an 'Obama Law' that took guns.. and then posted where the law didn't go into effect. Thus, Obama took no guns. Republicans have a hard time recognizing reality, now days.

 

VA medical information is used to block veterans from possessing firearms:

The Daily Caller obtained a “MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AND THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION REGARDING THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.”

The document, dated Feb. 27, 2012, makes clear the VA must send health information to the FBI for its gun background-check database.

“VA will provide an encrypted compact disc exchanged via mail to the FBI no less than quarterly for, inter alia, inclusion in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS),” the memo reads.

The memo defines the NICS database as a list of “persons prohibited under federal law from receiving or possessing firearms.”

“Data disclosed by VA to the FBI under the terms of this agreement is to be entered into the NICS Index…”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04...eir-guns-taken-away/

 

I believe that Ol'bama was the chief executive of the country at the time and  therefore in charge of running the FBI and VA. I believe that during the reign of King Ol'bama that over 250,000 vets were deprived of their rights without a proper court hearing; so yes, Ol'bama is responsible for taking people's rights.

So, we need to help the 'mentally ill' but not restrict their rights to own guns? Don't you Republicans scream about 'mental illness' every time a Republican shoots somebody?

Add Reply

Likes (0)
Post

×
×
×
×