Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

 

 i have to be straight up blunt here.. i am not in the least interested in a candidate's position on ' family values', because chances are what they define as ' family values' aren't the same as how *I* define it.

why would i want someone to try and impose their version of values on my family?

they have a hard enough time at thier real job so thye should stick with running the country, and not trying to run my life.

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:

Weiner is an amoral, Satan-loving, liberal that hates ice cream and kicks puppies.  Yet, he is still more respectable than Vitter, and Vitter is still in orifice. 

AGAIN...

Who? Oh you mean the guy who's indiscretion from 7 years in his past (an incident which he had already come to terms with between his wife and himself and changed his behavior accordingly) emerges into the public consciousness and you want to equate that with Weiner? Pathetic. AGAIN

what tickles me, is that you people (both parties) elect slimball Dbags, and then are surprised when they behave like slimball Dbags.

 

why don't all of you quit whining, and accept responsibility for electing buttmonkies like these people?

if Weiner isn't your buttmonkey, one of the other ones is.....no one has room to point the finger these days.

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:

I'll defer to the people that elected Studds 6 more times, after his censure. 

 

I understand Mark Sanford is running for POTUS in 2012.  He and Newt could make a power couple. 

Sure, sure... defer to those folks in Massachusetts... let's see they keep/kept electing Barney Frank, Gerry Studds, Ted Kennedy, and so on... winners all in the idiot derby. Sanford has proved he really has no leadership skills, and Newt is not the kind of leader needed as POTUS. And, BTW, Mark Sanford? Where did you get that info? Or is it simply more BS.

Originally Posted by The Nagel:

what tickles me, is that you people (both parties) elect slimball Dbags, and then are surprised when they behave like slimball Dbags.

 

why don't all of you quit whining, and accept responsibility for electing buttmonkies like these people?

if Weiner isn't your buttmonkey, one of the other ones is.....no one has room to point the finger these days.

I don't disagree with you here. However, I merely point out that in the attempts to sling mud at only Republicans, the slingers are missing a VERY TARGET RICH environment with the Democrat party.

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by The Nagel:

what tickles me, is that you people (both parties) elect slimball Dbags, and then are surprised when they behave like slimball Dbags.

 

why don't all of you quit whining, and accept responsibility for electing buttmonkies like these people?

if Weiner isn't your buttmonkey, one of the other ones is.....no one has room to point the finger these days.

I don't disagree with you here. However, I merely point out that in the attempts to sling mud at only Republicans, the slingers are missing a VERY TARGET RICH environment with the Democrat party.


oh.. oh big fat HUGE agree....

both sides are equally slimey. i don't pick sides, i hate them all.

only self deluded fools think their party are 'the right ones, with the right plans'... they are all the wrong choice.

add up the sex scandels alone... not hte duis or bounced checks or fraud or coersion or bribary or misappropriation of fund... juts the sex scandals of the last 12 years... from BOTH sides....

 

 add em up. these are the people we elect to lead us? congressmen have the morals of randy cats.

 

 

and number one?

 oh please.. no one died.. no one paid anyone for sex, no one got pregnant, no one lied to congress... his is only interesting because of the picture and the name...if it had been a pic of Smith's weiner instead of Weiner's weiner, it would barely even make the list..

 

i looked at this list... and then checked the republican list as well....

28 major sex scandles, for EACH PARTY since 1976.

56, total.

from simple affairs, to men soliciting page boys, to a plethora of hookers, to skinny dipping with 13 year old girls, to pregnancy to rape to death of the girl in question....

 

these are our elected leaders.. the best among us... the elite...

god help us.

 

Last edited by The Nagel
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:

Weiner is an amoral, Satan-loving, liberal that hates ice cream and kicks puppies.  Yet, he is still more respectable than Vitter, and Vitter is still in orifice. 

AGAIN...

Who? Oh you mean the guy who's indiscretion from 7 years in his past (an incident which he had already come to terms with between his wife and himself and changed his behavior accordingly) emerges into the public consciousness and you want to equate that with Weiner? Pathetic. AGAIN

 

Vitter, Vitter, Vitter. 

Weiner may be amoral he hes not an adulterer.  Vitters proclivity for being diapered by a hooker is just so far out of the norm, that I dont think a name exists for that sort of behavior.  But, its OK, he is willing to vote for tax cuts. 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×