Skip to main content

The “Obamacare” RFID chips are currently being given a test run on the proud and patriotic citizens of Hanna, Wyoming. Over the last two weeks a special piece of legislation has been passed making it mandatory for anyone who receives welfare, or any other form of government assistance to be implanted with these new identification chips.

 

Even select government employees and officials have been ordered to receive the new sub-dermal device, which is typically implanted in the fatty tissue of the individual’s buttock. Police officers, military, even garbage men will all be required to have the RFID chip by the end of next month or face termination from their jobs.

 

During the beta testing stage of this amazing new technological development, many news outlets have remained silent waiting to see how the trial pans out before reporting on the subject. 

 

National Report, always on the cutting edge, sent me on location to Hanna, Wyoming to speak with some of the towns folk and gather their opinions and experiences regarding their newly acquired RFID chips. Tammy Josephine Laurence, a single mother of three who is currently accepting housing assistance got her chip implanted just hours before we had a chance to sit down and speak with her. She had the following to say: - See more at: http://nationalreport.net/rfid...CCTDIb.25N4apqc.dpuf

 

Well, they said I better do this, or they was gonna cut the welfare. I’m a full time single mother. I got three young kids that need me at all hours and ain’t no man to help. I didn’t have no choice…” When asked if the procedure was invasive she informed us that it was “a little like giving blood” and that she felt “tired after getting the implant” which apparently is a common but benign side effect. I also spoke with Hanna, Wyoming’s Mayor Ted Howell, whose full support of the RFID chip made it mandatory for the citizens of his small community.

 

Leading by example he was the first recipient of the RFID chip , having it implanted publicly at a recent town hall meeting. “This is change for a better, safer America” he said while undergoing the ten minute procedure. “With this scientific advancement, the terrorists do not stand a chance… USA will prevail…” The ordinance has had some opposition, however, as several of the local churches have spoke out against the chips with protests.

 

These fringe apocalyptic churches believe Obama to be the anti-Christ and claim the RFID chip is the Mark Of The Beast written about in their Book Of Revelations. They site the RFID chip’s supposed serial number of 131618 as corresponding with Revelations 13:16-18. Of course, rural superstitions ultimately have no sway when it comes to the progressive new America and their scripture laden outcries have largely been ignored.

 

This journalist embraces the new change, and even got her very own RFID chip before heading back to the National Report’s home offices. The surgery was quick, simple and more or less painless. I can barely tell I’ve been implanted at all. A sacrifice I’ve gladly made for my country’s national security and hope you will too.

 

http://nationalreport.net/rfid...-new-obamacare-plan/

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Knew this was fake on the face of it.  Invasive surgery by government order requires a warrant for each operation.  Even bullets can't be removed if the victim denies the request. Even court may not order it if the bullet is needed to prove the victim guilty.  Plus, the batteries have a limited life., have to install a zipper. 

Can a microchip get lost inside my pet?

Your pet's subcutaneous tissue usually bonds to the chip within 24 hours, preventing it from moving, although there's a small chance that the chip could migrate. But it can't actually get lost inside your pet.

How long do microchips last?

Microchips are designed to work for 25 years.

 

 

Where can I get my pet microchipped?

Many veterinarians and some animal shelters implant microchips for a small fee. This is done with a large-bore needle and doesn't require anesthesia.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Jes' sayin'. Sayin' it like this cauze i'm kool.

The lifespan of an active tag depends on two main factors: the battery used and how often it is asked to transmit a signal. Some batteries can last for a year, while larger batteries can last for a decade. A tag can be set to broadcast its signal once per second, or once an hour, so the answer really depends on what kind of battery is used, and how often the tag is asked to transmit a signal. Passive tags can last for decades, depending on how they are treated. A tag in a dry environment with moderate temperatures that is not banged around can continue to perform normally for an indefinite period of time. But most vendors put a lifespan of about 10 years on their tags, as humidity and other environmental factors can affect the microchip. - See more at: http://www.rfidjournal.com/blo...sthash.bGA9Czxc.dpuf
The lifespan of an active tag depends on two main factors: the battery used and how often it is asked to transmit a signal. Some batteries can last for a year, while larger batteries can last for a decade. A tag can be set to broadcast its signal once per second, or once an hour, so the answer really depends on what kind of battery is used, and how often the tag is asked to transmit a signal. Passive tags can last for decades, depending on how they are treated. A tag in a dry environment with moderate temperatures that is not banged around can continue to perform normally for an indefinite period of time. But most vendors put a lifespan of about 10 years on their tags, as humidity and other environmental factors can affect the microchip. - See more at: http://www.rfidjournal.com/blo...sthash.bGA9Czxc.dpuf

http://www.rfidjournal.com/blogs/experts/entry?4673

One year for most, 10 for the large ones.  Large ones not for human bodies.

I've used these for inventory control.

There are a lot of right wing people who post a lot of things that just are not true. Dire can chastise me for calling them liars, but , hell, if you tell a lie, then what would you call them >?

But I digress:

I see these things going around on FaceBook all the time, mostly posted by my friends who are right wing nuts, and religious nuts to boot. So far, I have never found a single one to be truthful, so I imagine , that if you hate Obama that much, you would consider telling lies justifiable .

Since , as I said, most are religious nuts, and Vic, post a lot on the religious forum, what they seem to be doing is "lieing in the name of the Lord"

Personally, I know the Bible is pretty explicit about bearing false testimony , or lieing, and I just can't seem to be able to justify how telling lies (or passing them around - same thing) can be reconciled with Christian principals.

If Vic or someone else (like Bill who does it over and over again) wish to explain how you can bear false witness from one side of your mouth, and claim Christian values on the other, I'd like to hear it.

 

Originally Posted by seeweed:

There are a lot of right wing people who post a lot of things that just are not true. Dire can chastise me for calling them liars, but , hell, if you tell a lie, then what would you call them >?

But I digress:

I see these things going around on FaceBook all the time, mostly posted by my friends who are right wing nuts, and religious nuts to boot. So far, I have never found a single one to be truthful, so I imagine , that if you hate Obama that much, you would consider telling lies justifiable .

Since , as I said, most are religious nuts, and Vic, post a lot on the religious forum, what they seem to be doing is "lieing in the name of the Lord"

Personally, I know the Bible is pretty explicit about bearing false testimony , or lieing, and I just can't seem to be able to justify how telling lies (or passing them around - same thing) can be reconciled with Christian principals.

If Vic or someone else (like Bill who does it over and over again) wish to explain how you can bear false witness from one side of your mouth, and claim Christian values on the other, I'd like to hear it.

 

Nothing new about both sides stating again and again statements they know are false,  Sort of like the left on CCW holders "blood will be running in the streets or it will be the wild west" when data clearly shows that is not the case.

Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by seeweed:

There are a lot of right wing people who post a lot of things that just are not true. Dire can chastise me for calling them liars, but , hell, if you tell a lie, then what would you call them >?

But I digress:

I see these things going around on FaceBook all the time, mostly posted by my friends who are right wing nuts, and religious nuts to boot. So far, I have never found a single one to be truthful, so I imagine , that if you hate Obama that much, you would consider telling lies justifiable .

Since , as I said, most are religious nuts, and Vic, post a lot on the religious forum, what they seem to be doing is "lieing in the name of the Lord"

Personally, I know the Bible is pretty explicit about bearing false testimony , or lieing, and I just can't seem to be able to justify how telling lies (or passing them around - same thing) can be reconciled with Christian principals.

If Vic or someone else (like Bill who does it over and over again) wish to explain how you can bear false witness from one side of your mouth, and claim Christian values on the other, I'd like to hear it.

 

Nothing new about both sides stating again and again statements they know are false,  Sort of like the left on CCW holders "blood will be running in the streets or it will be the wild west" when data clearly shows that is not the case.

==========

I agree with the part about both parties stretching the truth, or outright lieing about things . What I resent tho, is people who spread the lies and then pretend to be so pias in their postings about Christianity. 

How many times have I seen post from people posting "Bibles are banned in school, but not prison, God taken out of the schools, you can't pray in schools, etc, etc"

None of those are true. No law against bringing a Bible to school, it can even be taught as a historical book, no law against praying - you know, as long as there are math test - . What you can't do is fource your beliefs on someone who may nor, or does not want to hear it. 
For example, I am glad that there is a law that forbids followers of Islam from forcing my grandkids to pray 5 times a day to Mecca, I am glad that there is no one forcing them to chant the Hare Krishna chant that is in the George Harrison song "My Sweet Lord" .

We should all be glad our kids are not forced to listen on a daily or weekly basis to passages from the Koran (or Quran - however it is spelled).

Well, sorry, I got off on a tangent, but I hope you can see my point about "lieing in the name of the Lord" 

My point in the original post is that Vic post often and with great convection on the Religon threads, yet spreads lies as fast as he can.  Am I the only one that sees a problem with that ?

I agree with the part about both parties stretching the truth, or outright lieing about things . What I resent tho, is people who spread the lies and then pretend to be so pias in their postings about Christianity. 

 

----------------------

One of the biggest liars on the left ever to have a "gut in her" was supposedly a big old christian and posted on the religion forum. Plenty of the so called christians on the left lie and you know it. I called bill on his lies plenty of times, but never saw anyone on the left call another leftie on their lies. BTW, the word is "lying", not "lieing". Surprised contendah didn't point that out.

Originally Posted by seeweed:
Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by seeweed:

There are a lot of right wing people who post a lot of things that just are not true. Dire can chastise me for calling them liars, but , hell, if you tell a lie, then what would you call them >?

But I digress:

I see these things going around on FaceBook all the time, mostly posted by my friends who are right wing nuts, and religious nuts to boot. So far, I have never found a single one to be truthful, so I imagine , that if you hate Obama that much, you would consider telling lies justifiable .

Since , as I said, most are religious nuts, and Vic, post a lot on the religious forum, what they seem to be doing is "lieing in the name of the Lord"

Personally, I know the Bible is pretty explicit about bearing false testimony , or lieing, and I just can't seem to be able to justify how telling lies (or passing them around - same thing) can be reconciled with Christian principals.

If Vic or someone else (like Bill who does it over and over again) wish to explain how you can bear false witness from one side of your mouth, and claim Christian values on the other, I'd like to hear it.

 

Nothing new about both sides stating again and again statements they know are false,  Sort of like the left on CCW holders "blood will be running in the streets or it will be the wild west" when data clearly shows that is not the case.

==========

I agree with the part about both parties stretching the truth, or outright lieing about things . What I resent tho, is people who spread the lies and then pretend to be so pias in their postings about Christianity. 

How many times have I seen post from people posting "Bibles are banned in school, but not prison, God taken out of the schools, you can't pray in schools, etc, etc"

None of those are true. No law against bringing a Bible to school, it can even be taught as a historical book, no law against praying - you know, as long as there are math test - . What you can't do is fource your beliefs on someone who may nor, or does not want to hear it. 
For example, I am glad that there is a law that forbids followers of Islam from forcing my grandkids to pray 5 times a day to Mecca, I am glad that there is no one forcing them to chant the Hare Krishna chant that is in the George Harrison song "My Sweet Lord" .

We should all be glad our kids are not forced to listen on a daily or weekly basis to passages from the Koran (or Quran - however it is spelled).

Well, sorry, I got off on a tangent, but I hope you can see my point about "lieing in the name of the Lord" 

My point in the original post is that Vic post often and with great convection on the Religon threads, yet spreads lies as fast as he can.  Am I the only one that sees a problem with that ?

I agree on that also.  Whenever anyone who I am dealing with starts telling what a Christian they are, I get nervous especially if money is involved.   If you are a true Christian I will know by your actions not your words,

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×