Skip to main content

CIA snitch Eric Ciaramella filed a whistleblower complaint on August 12 over President Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky where the two discussed ferreting out corruption.  This included talk on investigating the Biden crime family.

** The so-called “whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella is a Democrat who had a “professional” tie to a 2020 Democrat.

** Schiff’s staff recommended attorneys for the so called “whistleblower.”

** Ciaramella was kicked out of the White House for leaking negative stories about Donald Trump in 2017.

** Trump-hater Ciaramella was behind the fake story that Putin told Trump to fire Comey — a COMPLETE FAKE NEWS STORY from 2017!


** Ciaramella’s attorneys worked for James Clapper, Hillary ClintonChuck Schumer, and donated to Joe Biden.

** An attorney for Ciaramella is a member of the #Resistance.

** Ciaramella  worked with Joe Biden in the executive branch when he was Vice President.

** Ciaramella had no problem with the Joe Biden and Hunter Biden’s million dollar pay-for-play scandal with Ukraine.

** Ciaramella traveled with Joe Biden to the Ukraine.

** Ciaramella worked with DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa in the creation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.

** A former associate of James Clapper, Charles McCullough, assisted Ciaramella with his complaint against Trump.

** And Adam Schiff’s aides, Abigail Grace and Sean Misko worked with Ciaramella in the White House.

But Eric Ciaramella may have more problems than just hiding his anonymity from the American public.
FOX News legal expert Gregg Jarrett wrote today that Ciaramella, who was mentioned in the Mueller report, may be implicated in the upcoming IG FISA report.

If this information is true, it is possible that this “whistleblower” could be one of the individuals who might need a defense lawyer in the coming weeks when the findings of the FISA report are made public. The reported direct relationship with James Brennan, the “Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election,” and Susan Rice makes them a likely candidate to be at the very least called as a witness in the cases that are likely to start following the FISA report. In addition, his area of expertise is reportedly Russia and Ukraine; two of the reported locations where information used in the anti- Trump Russian Dossier was “gathered.” The name that Real Clear Investigations revealed is also listed as a source in one of Robert Mueller’s footnotes in his report.

This means that with the Democrats starting the impeachment inquiry the “whistleblower” may be a witness, or a defendant, in a separate case where real evidence has been produced of criminal wrongdoing. In this case, their feelings, opinions, and rumors that they heard will not be important. The facts and potentially illegal actions that took place to start the witch hunt against President Trump will be concrete evidence that the Democrats and the media will be unable to spin politically.

Wouldn’t it be just perfect if Shifty Schiff’s “whistleblower” Mr. Ciaramella is caught up in the IG FISA investigation?

Original Post

Any whistleblower who is coming forward because of the public interest or to report gross negligence isn't going to be seeking to be kept secret as that would make anything they had to report/say, suspect.  A whistleblower comes forward usually at great risk but is known and not kept secret.  

You can bet if there was someone, anyone, coming forward during the Obama administration claiming to KNOW that Obama had faked his birth certificate but required to be kept secret from everyone he/she would have been laughed out of Washington and discredited immediately.   I'm not saying Obama faked his birth certificate but rather used that as an example but while I'm using that as an example there is yet another application that can be given using the same thought.   

Remember that the media and everyone is bent on declaring that Trump's chief of Staff admitted to what they are blaming Trump for and even though he clarified it and said he didn't mean it the way they took it they are still running with it and not allowing him to take it back but are sticking with what he was said to have said first.  Remember there was a book where Obama, himself, in the introduction said he was born in Kenya or claimed he was born in Kenya but that was quickly discounted by everyone as a mistake and should not be taken literally.

In essence, it only demonstrates all over again the double standard that exists in Washington and across the nation.  One is taken at his word, if a liberal or Democrat and always and continually questioned and doubted if a Republican or Conservative.  It really doesn't matter at all now and shouldn't because it doesn't matter where he was truly born now as he was one of the worst Presidents ever in terms of what he was able to get done or what he actually did.

The double standard is still alive and well in the media also.  With the recent killing and attack on ISIS leader, the media is salivating and falling all over itself claiming that the leader was killed in spite of Trump rather than giving Trump any credit what so ever.   Obama though got total credit as if he stepped off the helicopter himself and pulled the trigger himself.  The media is so outrageously biased and deranged over Trump that they just can't help it.

Back to the whistleblower or better yet the Democratic Hack or tool because it should be apparent to anyone that something stinks when you have to conceal identification, backgrounds, and information surrounding a person who is supposed to have such critical and crucial information about a crime.  This is why every person accused has the right to face and to question their accuser to avoid the impropriety of someone falsely accusing another.  Everything about this tool of a person is secret for a reason and that is to protect the guilty.

Add Reply


Link copied to your clipboard.