Skip to main content

Claims Al Gore took incomplete 'worst case scenario' data to promote climate change fear.


The scientist who is widely regarded as the "Father of Global Warming" has admitted that the data used to promote his theory was false and manipulated to fit an agenda.The former NASA scientist, James Hansen, was called on in the 1980s by Congress during a hearing on global warming organized by then-Congressman Al Gore to produce scientific models based on a number of different scenarios that could impact the planet.According to Hansen, Gore took the data provided in a "worst-case scenario" and ran with it, rebranding it as "Global Warming."The model, one of many provided to Congress by Hansen, titled Scenario B, left out significant factors meaning it didn't reflect real-world conditions.

A new study has compared real-world data to the original Scenario B model and found no correlation, to which Hansen responded saying he's "devastated" by the way his data has been used.Real World data shows "no warming"The dire climate prediction that was taken from Hansen's data model “significantly overstates the warming” observed in the real world since the 1980s, according to a new analysis.

Western Journal reports: Economist Ross McKitrick and climate scientist John Christy found observed warming trends match the low end of what Hansen told Congress during a hearing on global warming organized by then-Congressman Al Gore.“Climate modelers will object that this explanation doesn’t fit the theories about climate change,” the two wrote.

But those were the theories Hansen used, and they don’t fit the data. "The bottom line is, climate science as encoded in the models is far from settled.”Cato Institute climate scientists Patrick Michaels and Ryan Maue wrote that “surface temperatures are behaving as if we had capped 18 years ago the carbon-dioxide emissions responsible for the enhanced greenhouse effect.”“But we didn’t. And it isn’t just Mr. Hansen who got it wrong,” Michaels and Maue wrote in The Wall Street Journal in June.The WSJ op-ed set off a fierce debate over the accuracy of Hansen’s predictions.Several media reports interviewing climate scientists claimed Hansen’s predictions — issued in 1988 — were pretty much correct.

http://www.neonnettle.com/news...admits-data-is-false

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Global Warming Skeptic Organizations (2013)

 

An overwhelming majority of scientists agree — global warming is happening and human activity is the primary cause. Yet several prominent global warming skeptic organizations are actively working to sow doubt about the facts of global warming.

These organizations play a key role in the fossil fuel industry's "disinformation playbook," a strategy designed to confuse the public about global warming and delay action on climate change. Why? Because the fossil fuel industry wants to sell more coal, oil, and gas — even though the science clearly shows that the resulting carbon emissions threaten our planet.

Who are these groups? And what is the evidence linking them to the fossil fuel industry?

Here's a quick primer on several prominent global warming skeptic organizations, including examples of their disinformation efforts and funding sources from the fossil fuel industry. Many have received large donations from foundations established, and supported, by the fossil fuel billionaire Koch brothers. ...

...Cato Institute

Cato acknowledges that “Global warming is indeed real…” But when it comes to the causes of global warming, Cato has sent mixed messages over the years. Cato's website, for instance, reports that “… human activity has been a contributor [to global warming] since 1975.” [23] Yet, on the same topic of whether human activity is responsible for global warming, Cato’s vice president has written: “We don’t know.” [24]

Patrick Michaels, Director of Cato’s Center for the Study of Science, has referred to the latest Draft National Climate Assessment Report as “the stuff of fantasy.” [25] The most recent edition of Cato’s “Handbook for Policymakers” advises that Congress should “pass no legislation restricting emissions of carbon dioxide.” [26]

Charles Koch co-founded Cato in 1977. Both Charles and David Koch were among the four “shareholders” who “owned” Cato until 2011 [27], and the latter Koch remains a member of Cato’s Board of Directors. [28] Koch foundations contributed more than $5 million to Cato from 1997-2011. [29]"

https://www.ucsusa.org/global-...ic.html#.Wz-nupNG2M8

 

Exxon Knew about Climate Change almost 40 years ago...

...when its senior scientist James Black delivered a sobering message on the topic. “In the first place, there is general scientific agreement that the most likely manner in which mankind is influencing the global climate is through carbon dioxide release from the burning of fossil fuels," Black told Exxon’s management committee. A year later he warned Exxon that doubling CO2 gases in the atmosphere would increase average global temperatures by two or three degrees—a number that is consistent with the scientific consensus today. He continued to warn that “present thinking holds that man has a time window of five to 10 years before the need for hard decisions regarding changes in energy strategies might become critical."

https://www.scientificamerican...almost-40-years-ago/

 

 

Last edited by OldSalt

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×