Skip to main content

A few stories that will or have never see the light of day on NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, or major newspapers are one regarding the likelihood or indications that possibly Professor Ford did not write or originate the letter sent to the senator.  In that letter, her best friend is referred to as a man when it is obvious that her best friend is female and she would have known this yet the letter was written as if the best friend was male.   There are other inconsistencies that made some feel that the letter may not have been wholly written by Mrs. Ford.

Politifact says otherwise, that Mrs. Ford did write the letter

Another story is regarding Professor Ford's best friend, Leland Ingham Keyser, stated that she felt pressure from Monica McLean, a former FBI agent, and friend to Professor Ford, to change or alter her already given, under oath, the story, regarding what Professor Ford said in her statement, from stating that she didn't remember anything like that to backing up what Professor Ford said.

Ford's best friend felt pressure to change her story

You also find it tough to find statements by Mrs. Ford's former boyfriend and what he had to say about her.  You hear pasted all over the media any speculation by old classmates of Brett Kavanaugh whether credible or not but a former boyfriend is censored when it comes to the mainstream media because it cast doubts on Mrs. Ford's statements.

Mrs. Ford's ex-boyfriend cast doubts on some of her statements

Omissions are not limited to stories about Ford or Kavanaugh but you will find it difficult to find stories giving Trump credit for His, or his administration's, positive achievements.  Good news is no news it seems.   

CBS local NY financial news mentions it.   Can't seem to find it as good news as CBS

CNBC has to lead with a negative before a positive

During the Obama administration any hint at a reduction in unemployment even though Obama couldn't buy a positive story like this, was always reported.  Negatives were re-written to appear as a positive for Obama but for Trump any positive news is dismissed or hidden or relegated to a spot that is so difficult to find that you'd have to google it and then google doesn't list major news networks covering it.  IF Obama had achieved this level of unemployment then it would have been breaking news and it would have been brought up for months.  Trump can't seem to buy news when it's something positive but you can be assured if there is something negative then it will be posted all over the news as breaking news, page 1 news etc.

No need to ask is there a bias in the news, it's too obvious there is to even challenge.  At least on FOX, you do get to hear some of these stories but then the response from other news outlets is that FOX is biased to the Right.  Maybe it's just that FOX News reports all the news, good and bad.  Yes FOX News does have biased commentators that do not pretend to be objective or say they are reporters or that their show is unbiased news but FOX News does report to be unbiased and fair and balanced.  For the New York Times to attempt to use the statement "Report the news impartially without favor" is a joke anymore.

Be as the Bereans ( Acts 17:11 )

Original Post

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×