This is something we should question?  I'm all for keeping politicians legal and legit but if there is outrage about Rudy and the media remains totally quiet, deaf, dumb and blind with regards to Joe Biden and his Son Hunter then you just know, and knew, the fix was and is in.  How do you cover for Joe Biden and Hunter?  You create another story about someone connected to Trump.  In the above-linked story they go after Rudy but just imagine if it were one of the Trump sons that inked a deal with China or Ukraine or any Nation/Country and you'd just know the outrage and calls for resignation.  This isn't anything new for most if they are thinking individuals know that the media is on a campaign to destroy Trump and anything or anyone connected with him.

I do hope Trump is re-elected not as much because I'd love to see liberals and Democrats eat their stomachs out but because Trump is actually good for the Nation, good for American and Americans.  It's about time that we got a true President and not some lackey that is there to further the agenda of their donors and typical, traditional, politicians.  One look at most, if not all, and I do believe it's fair to say all, politicians in Congress and the question that comes to mind is just how do these "public servants' all get so rich while in office or immediately out of office?   There is no doubt that a large number of our "Public Servants" know and take advantage of ways to get rich off the public dole and you can bet one of the reasons Trump is so hated is that he doesn't have to do this but rails against it because he already has his money made and is actually there to do some good and serve the people that elected him.  

Another thing that is fairly apparent is how so many people who decry Trump and are sooo angry and insane about Trump don't really know Trump but are just obedient lapdogs who are taking what they are told by the media and the DNC and running with it as if they had first-hand knowledge.  IF somehow Trump is defeated I have no doubt that most (who voted against Trump) will experience financial problems and difficulty account of their very vote yet will never realize that they shot their own selves in the foot by voting Trump out.  Maybe though sanity will remain and people will not vote Trump out but will recognize that Trump has been the only politician who has really served our Nation and it's people rather than taken advantage of them and enriched himself.  

I know it drives so many crazy and insane to hear it but if Trump is not the most successful and best US President that we have had he's darn close to the top and for most of us is the best of our lifetime.  For me, two of the best Presidents that we have had have come in most of our lifetimes and those are Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump.  Other than those two Carter may have been a "good" moral person but he was a disastrous President.  

Be as the Bereans ( Acts 17:11 )

Original Post

Trump isn't pure, actually far from it.  However he was elected to drain the swamp.  A choir boy doesn't have a chance doing that.  He has very little assistance, since the swamp is full with both parties.  I pray he wins the next election then starts exposing some of the republican swamp.   

on you said it, someone said Bill Clinton and Trump were alike.   Don't think so  Clinton had an affair with a 23 year old in the oval office.   Yes Trump is a player, however not in the oval office.  

Democrats elite are heavily financially invested in China.  I am waiting for it to come out that some republicans are also invested in China.  

If this whistle blower has such damaging testimony, then why hasn't the democrats brought her/him forward?   It is just a tool to be able to have hearings on Trump cabinet to try to find dirt.  I am questioning if there is even a whistle blower.

Trump is exactly what we've been needing. I love it that he tells them like it is. He says things I would love to say to democratic politicians...and things that have been needed to be said to them for a long time! Look at how he made them show their true selves as the racist...anti-American...corrupt...criminal...biased group we have always known the democrats to be.

1130 posted:

Trump isn't pure, actually far from it.  However he was elected to drain the swamp.  A choir boy doesn't have a chance doing that.  He has very little assistance, since the swamp is full with both parties.  I pray he wins the next election then starts exposing some of the republican swamp.   

on you said it, someone said Bill Clinton and Trump were alike.   Don't think so  Clinton had an affair with a 23 year old in the oval office.   Yes Trump is a player, however not in the oval office.  

Democrats elite are heavily financially invested in China.  I am waiting for it to come out that some republicans are also invested in China.  

If this whistle blower has such damaging testimony, then why hasn't the democrats brought her/him forward?   It is just a tool to be able to have hearings on Trump cabinet to try to find dirt.  I am questioning if there is even a whistle blower.

Regarding the last paragraph of your post, about the whistleblower ... I don't really see this person as a whistleblower but more a Democratic plant/mouthpiece.  The Democrats don't want the identity to come out for it would then reveal the highly partisan nature of the complaint and by doing this way they can do it, as they are doing most everything, in hiding and secret, where they only control what's released to their highly sympathetic (pathetic) partisan media.  

The Democrats are running around all high and mighty saying they are wanting to protect democracy when they are wanting to do the exact opposite in attempting a coup of a legitimately elected President.   I wouldn't go as far as to say that there aren't Republicans that would do the same but it's just that the Democrats have perfected the art of doing it.  Republicans didn't spend countless of days and millions of dollars investigating Obama and attempting to impeach him because Republicans just don't do that kind of thing, they prefer to win in the elections.  Sadly though there are plenty of Republicans who deserve to lose their positions also and as you alluded to are Swamp Republicans.  

I have no doubt that just as many Republicans, on the Hill, have taken advantage of ways to pad their pockets and take care of their families as have Democrats and that good ole boys (and girls) club consist of both parties regardless of who is in power.  If Republicans had attempted to impeach Obama and had done exactly what the Democrats are doing now, excluding the opposite parties politicians from their closed meetings, and going through the steps such that the subject of the impeachment investigation has no rights or ability to defend themselves then you know the media would be up in arms and crying each night about the unfairness of it and calling for heads to roll.

Imagine if this was about Obama and a Republican committee head, in the house addressing the public and the media had lied 100% about EVERYTHING the President had said, do you think the media would turn a deaf ear to it?  Schiff wasn't scolded or condemned by the media for doing that very thing.  If the whistleblower(s) are not really whistleblowers then what is an example of one?

In my mind someone like Eric Snowden or the recent person at CNN who came out with the undercover videos of CNN's President and what goes on over there.   Agree with Snowden or not he thought he knew about something that shouldn't be done and he revealed it as did the CNN whistleblower. Why are they, whistleblowers?  For one they lost a great deal by coming forward.  They also came forward on their own accord whereas the whistleblowers against Trump went to Adam Schiff and was counseled by him maybe to the point of drafting the actual complaint (concern).  A real whistleblower, most of them, come forward knowing that they will be revealed such that the urgency and importance of the revelation get credibility.  This cloak and dagger type is not a revelation but derived and conceived propaganda and conjecture and attempts to sour the public on Donald Trump without a revelation of who made the complaint.  Why?  Because they don't want the highly partisan background of the person to come out betraying the Democrats and their devious strategy to concoct something to try and get Trump on.  

gbrk posted:
1130 posted:

Trump isn't pure, actually far from it.  However he was elected to drain the swamp.  A choir boy doesn't have a chance doing that.  He has very little assistance, since the swamp is full with both parties.  I pray he wins the next election then starts exposing some of the republican swamp.   

on you said it, someone said Bill Clinton and Trump were alike.   Don't think so  Clinton had an affair with a 23 year old in the oval office.   Yes Trump is a player, however not in the oval office.  

Democrats elite are heavily financially invested in China.  I am waiting for it to come out that some republicans are also invested in China.  

If this whistle blower has such damaging testimony, then why hasn't the democrats brought her/him forward?   It is just a tool to be able to have hearings on Trump cabinet to try to find dirt.  I am questioning if there is even a whistle blower.

Regarding the last paragraph of your post, about the whistleblower ...I don't really see this person as a whistleblower but more a Democratic plant/mouthpiece The Democrats don't want the identity to come out for it would then reveal the highly partisan nature of the complaint and by doing this way they can do it, as they are doing most everything, in hiding and secret, where they only control what's released to their highly sympathetic (pathetic) partisan media.  

The Democrats are running around all high and mighty saying they are wanting to protect democracy when they are wanting to do the exact opposite in attempting a coup of a legitimately elected President.   I wouldn't go as far as to say that there aren't Republicans that would do the same but it's just that the Democrats have perfected the art of doing it.  Republicans didn't spend countless of days and millions of dollars investigating Obama and attempting to impeach him because Republicans just don't do that kind of thing, they prefer to win in the elections.  Sadly though there are plenty of Republicans who deserve to lose their positions also and as you alluded to are Swamp Republicans.  

I have no doubt that just as many Republicans, on the Hill, have taken advantage of ways to pad their pockets and take care of their families as have Democrats and that good ole boys (and girls) club consist of both parties regardless of who is in power.  If Republicans had attempted to impeach Obama and had done exactly what the Democrats are doing now, excluding the opposite parties politicians from their closed meetings, and going through the steps such that the subject of the impeachment investigation has no rights or ability to defend themselves then you know the media would be up in arms and crying each night about the unfairness of it and calling for heads to roll.

Imagine if this was about Obama and a Republican committee head, in the house addressing the public and the media had lied 100% about EVERYTHING the President had said, do you think the media would turn a deaf ear to it?  Schiff wasn't scolded or condemned by the media for doing that very thing.  If the whistleblower(s) are not really whistleblowers then what is an example of one?

In my mind someone like Eric Snowden or the recent person at CNN who came out with the undercover videos of CNN's President and what goes on over there.   Agree with Snowden or not he thought he knew about something that shouldn't be done and he revealed it as did the CNN whistleblower. Why are they, whistleblowers?  For one they lost a great deal by coming forward.  They also came forward on their own accord whereas the whistleblowers against Trump went to Adam Schiff and was counseled by him maybe to the point of drafting the actual complaint (concern).  A real whistleblower, most of them, come forward knowing that they will be revealed such that the urgency and importance of the revelation get credibility.  This cloak and dagger type is not a revelation but derived and conceived propaganda and conjecture and attempts to sour the public on Donald Trump without a revelation of who made the complaint.  Why?  Because they don't want the highly partisan background of the person to come out betraying the Democrats and their devious strategy to concoct something to try and get Trump on.  

Pertaining to the highlighted sections of your post...
Do you know who the whistleblower is? How on earth can you make such ridiculous claims as 'highly partisan background', 'Democratic mouthpiece/plant'?

Where's your proof of the claim 'the whistleblower against Trump went to Adam Schiff and was counseled by him maybe to the point of drafting the actual complaint.'????

How much money and how many investigations did Republicans have into Hillary? 7 different investigations and who knows how many millions of dollars.

Biggest Hypocrite of the forums strikes out again.

Add Reply

Likes (0)
Post

×
×
×
×