Specifically, Sharpton suggested that the FCC should establish "guidelines" or "standards" to regulate speech.
I guess Al has forgotten about the 1st amendment.
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideC...2010/11/24/id/378094
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Sez Buttercup:
I want to see someone regulate Al Sharpton's speech...and his appearances on MSNBC.
I can't stand him!
quote:Originally posted by Buttercup:
I want to see someone regulate Al Sharpton's speech...and his appearances on MSNBC.
I can't stand him!
quote:Sez rocky:
Get rid of Rush?????? In a perfect world!!! Do you right wing radicals really believe him?????
It would insure Obama's election in 2012 just like the THUGS nominating Sarah from Wasilla. STUPID RETUGLITEACONS!
quote:Originally posted by rocky:
Get rid of Rush?????? In a perfect world!!! Do you right wing radicals really believe him?????
It would insure Obama's election in 2012 just like the THUGS nominating Sarah from Wasilla. STUPID RETUGLITEACONS!
quote:I guess Al has forgotten about the 1st amendment.
quote:Sez dolemitejb:
I don't necessarily want the FCC to regulate political speech on the radio, but this isn't a First Amendment issue. The FCC has long established that the First Amendment is not absolute on the public airwaves, and "the people" generally seem ok with allowing them to ignore the First Amendment in this capacity. If the First Amendment does in fact prohibit the FCC from regulating speech on the public airwaves, someone owes Howard Stern et al a huge refund from fines.
quote:Uhh...YES, this IS a First Amendment issue.
Should you check the FCC rules, you would see that "political dissent" is among the most protected "rights".
However, the FCC is obligated to filter out...offensive "language"...per, "obscene"...as defined.
Although Limbaugh may make "waves", his retoric is within FCC guidelines.
On the other hand...Stern repeatedly pushes the bounds.
quote:"Kurt Cobain was, ladies and gentleman, I just--he was a worthless shred of human debris..." (TV show, 4/11/94)
"Why is it that whenever a corporation fires workers it is never speculated that the workers might have deserved it?" (Ought to Be, p.275)