Skip to main content

In my opinion, what we might be wearing in Heaven is not a bit of trivia. It impinges on how we see the afterlife -- if our bodies are glorified, then GOD'S work would not require any covering -- a sign of imperfection. Not to mention being a marker of social class. If we are all Children of GOD, then it should follow that we are all equal in HIS eyes. In my opinion, to assume that we will be clothed marks a lack of faith in His works -- that even afterwards we would still be prurient, flawed, and cold. What's your take on this, guys?
quote:
Originally posted by Disappointed:
In my opinion, what we might be wearing in Heaven is not a bit of trivia. It impinges on how we see the afterlife -- if our bodies are glorified, then GOD'S work would not require any covering -- a sign of imperfection. Not to mention being a marker of social class. If we are all Children of GOD, then it should follow that we are all equal in HIS eyes. In my opinion, to assume that we will be clothed marks a lack of faith in His works -- that even afterwards we would still be prurient, flawed, and cold. What's your take on this, guys?


i cna go along with that reasoning
bill won't, cause that means that everyone is all nekkie, and if one is nekkie, surrounded by lots of other nekkie people, people might start to think about things to do that being nekkie makes much easier.
now.. some will say that no one will be interested in that kind of goings on, but how can that be heaven? everyone is a nude eunich or frigid and sexless..
lots of married folks have that now..
/shrug.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×