Skip to main content

Hi to my Forum Friends,

In the discussion "Where Are The Preachers?" posted by Deep who was lamenting the lack of qualified preachers on the Religion Forum -- Nagel replies, "I'm an actual ordained minister. What do you wanna know?"

I asked Nagel, "You tell us you are an ordained minister. What is your opinion of the Bible? How would you define the Bible? Just curious."

And, Nagel responds, "My opinion of the Bible isn't relevant. Definition of the Bible: the book that the Christian faith rests on. I think the Bible doesn't need interpretation. We don't need people like you to explain that what the verse REALLY meant isn't even close to what it actually said, but we aren't blessed enough to understand it. My being ordained has nothing to do with it."

I asked Nagel, "One of us seems to be confused. You tell us you ARE an ordained minister. Then, you tell us that the opinion of an ordained minister regarding the Bible isn't relevant? Then, you tell us your being ordained has nothing to do with the Bible? How does one dismiss the Bible, the Written Word of God -- and still become an ordained minister of God? This does sound confusing. Do you mind explaining this to we folks with inquiring minds?"

And, then B50 jumps in with, "The rest of us got it. I think he is saying his standing as a minister is to not influence other people's reading of the Bible. He realizes people are smart enough to read it on their own and they don't need it 'interpreted the correct way' from lay people or cut and paste jobs from fundamentalist pastors who deem it a certain way. We can all discuss it and explore possible different meanings with out condemnation. Would you like to try it that way?"

Yes, I would! But, who will lead the discussions? A discussion without a leader is sort of like a hen house without noise control.

When I am responsible for a Bible study or Sunday School class -- I will always define myself as the study leader, not the teacher. Why? Because the only good Bible study or Sunday School class is one where everyone participates, where everyone joins in the discussion, and where we will most often agree, but, at times, we will disagree. The leader's responsibility is to keep the study focused, moving in the right direction, and not going off on off-topic tangents.

You tell me that Nagel is an ordained minister who does "not (want to) influence other people's reading of the Bible." Then, what is, or was, his purpose for becoming an ordained minister? If not to share the Word of God, teach the Word of God, and to tell folks about Jesus Christ and the "free gift" of salvation He offers to all of us -- then, what is the purpose of being a minister?

One does not have to be ordained to be a pastor/teacher. Typically, today, we define an ordained minister as one who has his Master's degree from a seminary, has been reviewed by a body of peers, and approved to be ordained, given authority, as a minister within that church or denomination. Yes, that is a criteria set by today's churches and denominations -- but, not a bad guideline.

Or, one can go to a "Become an ordained minister immediately. Send us $75 and you will be able to start performing weddings tomorrow" type of web sites, such as the one in Fresno, California, and buy an ordination certificate.

Biblical ordination is a granting or passing of authority. In the Old Testament, God ordained Moses as the leader of the Israelites. Moses then ordained Joshua as his successor.

In the New Testament, we see in Ephesians 4:11-13 that Jesus Himself ordained specific offices in His church, "And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets, and some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the saints for the work of service, to the building up of the body of Christ; until we all attain to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to the measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ."

The office of apostle was filled by the eleven who walked with Him -- and Paul who was given a special ordination on the road to Damascus. As we are told in Acts 1:21-22, apostles were those who were personally chosen by Christ -- and who walked with Him during His earthly ministry and was there to witness His resurrection. Only those twelve, excluding Matthias, for he was chosen by Peter and the other apostle and not by Jesus Christ.

So, those eleven plus Paul are the apostles. When they died -- there are no more apostles -- unless you know someone who walked with Jesus during those 3 1/2 years and was there for His resurrection. I know of no one who meets that criteria today -- so, I believe there are no more apostles.

The office of prophet was for those chosen as special messengers sent by God. The purpose of the prophets was to proclaim God's word or His revelations to the people. At that time only the rabbis in the temples had scrolls of Scripture -- so, for the common people to hear God's proclamation, He sent prophets among the people. Most people consider John the Baptist to be the last Old Testament prophet. With the Bible we now have direct access to the Word of God and have no need for prophets.

The office of Evangelism is alive and well today. Evangelists are those who follow the commission given by Jesus Christ in Matthew 28:19-20 to Go, Make disciples, Baptize them, Teach them -- and Acts 1:8, Mark 16:15 when He told us to be His witnesses to all the world.

The office of Pastor/Teacher is a very important responsibility. It must be -- for Jesus gives it great emphasis. In Matthew 20 He tells evangelist to Teach Them. And, in this passage of Ephesians 4:11-13, He makes this office one of the four He has personally appointed. From this I gather that He places great importance upon the teaching of the Word of God.

For the past twenty plus years, one thing I have appreciated about Pastor Chuck Smith of Calvary Chapel is the fact that he teaches the Bible through expository sermons and Bible studies.

Basically there are two main types of sermons: topical and expository. With topical sermons the pastor/teacher picks a subject or topic, and then finds Scripture passages and verses to support his meaning of that subject. Once I watched a popular television Prosperity Theology preacher teaching on anointing oil. He quickly flashed about ten Scripture verses on the screen as support of his meaning of the oil. Nothing wrong with this.

However, I quickly wrote down all the verses and then looked them up. Maybe 3/4 of them were applicable to what he was preaching. The others were marginal at best. But, he had ten verses to support his sermon. In other words, the Topical Sermon pastor will pick a topic, decide what he believe it means -- and, then find Scripture verses he believes will support that meaning. And, many times he is using Scripture to paint a green horse red.

On the other hand, in expository sermons the Pastor/Teacher is teaching through the Bible. He starts with Genesis 1:1 and teaches through to Revelation 22:21 without skipping a single verse. In other words, he does not find a topic and then try to fit Scripture to it. He reads the Scripture verse or passage -- and, using his own knowledge of the Bible, commentaries from Bible scholars, and examples from other mature Bible teachers -- he will explain what God is telling us in that verse or passage from Scripture. The expository Pastor/Teachers’s goal is simply to "expose" the meaning of the Bible, verse by verse.

Pastor Chuck told of his first years as a pastor when he felt called to teach topical sermons. During the first year, he wrote and delivered fifty topical sermons. But, then his well went dry; he could think of no more topics he could use for sermons. So, he jokingly said that he had three choices: (1) begin all over and preach the same fifty sermons all over again -- possibly boring everyone, or (2) leave that church and go to a new church where they had not yet heard his fifty topical sermons, or (3) begin to preach expository sermons. Praise God he chose the third option and, to date, has preached through the Bible a number of times.

My Friends, that is why Jesus Christ gave us Pastor/Teachers -- and why He has raised up other Christian believers to share the Word of God with the world. To every Christian believer, Jesus Christ left these instructions: "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age" (Matthew 28:19-20)

And, He instructs us, "You shall be My witnesses both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and even to the remotest part of the earth" (Acts 1:8) and in Mark 16:15, He tells us, "Go into all the world and preach the Gospel to all creation."

So, yes, B50 and Nagel, we all need mature Christian leaders, pastors, and teachers to help us better understand the Word of God. As we are told in Proverbs 27:17, "Iron sharpens iron, So one man sharpens another" -- and, one Christian believer helps sharpen other Christian believers as, together, we study and mature in our knowledge of God's Written Word, the Bible -- and God's will for our lives.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I didn't read it either but I can tell what it said.

The bible says "this" and so "this" is right, because the bible is the literal, inerrant word of god. But in this cause what it means is "that". Most are confused by "this and that" and I am here to tell you what "this" really means because I can interpretet "this" to "that" better than the rest of you godforsaken liberal, atheist.

God Bless.
quote:
pick a topic, decide what he believe it means -- and, then find Scripture verses he believes will support that meaning. And, many times he is using Scripture to paint a green horse red.


And that is exactly what Bill Gray does every day, right here on this forum.

And another of his tricks is to deliberately misunderstand what others post. Hence, this new thread.
quote:
Originally posted by DarkAngel:
I didn't read it either but I can tell what it said.

The bible says "this" and so "this" is right, because the bible is the literal, inerrant word of god. But in this cause what it means is "that". Most are confused by "this and that" and I am here to tell you what "this" really means because I can interpretet "this" to "that" better than the rest of you godforsaken liberal, atheist. God Bless.

Who knows,

Maybe the bible used in the church where one finds "Dark Angels" is not the Word of God. Definitely a possibility!

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Sylvester-Cat-2_TEXT
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
quote:
Originally posted by DarkAngel:
I didn't read it either but I can tell what it said.

The bible says "this" and so "this" is right, because the bible is the literal, inerrant word of god. But in this cause what it means is "that". Most are confused by "this and that" and I am here to tell you what "this" really means because I can interpretet "this" to "that" better than the rest of you godforsaken liberal, atheist. God Bless.

Who knows,

Maybe the bible used in the church where one finds "Dark Angels" is not the Word of God. Definitely a possibility!

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill


I don't go to church.

Are you saying that anyone who doesn't believe as you can not identify a charlatan, snake handler when we see one? I beg to differ.
quote:
Yes, I would! But, who will lead the discussions? A discussion without a leader is sort of like a hen house without noise control.

There doesn't have to be a leader. Anyone can put up a scripture and then give their two cents. Nobody condemns another's point of view, there are no ad hominem attacks, and we all learn.
Nobody gets to be the only 'right' answer.

Let's start with:
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

quote:
Amplified version:
Genesis 1
1IN THE beginning God (prepared, formed, fashioned, and) created the heavens and the earth.(A)


quote:
Genesis 1:1 (New Living Translation)

Genesis 1
The Account of Creation
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.[a]

Footnotes:

1. Genesis 1:1 Or In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth, . . . Or When God began to create the heavens and the earth, . . .



quote:
Genesis 1:1 (New Century Version)

Genesis 1
The Beginning of All Things
The Beginning of the World
1 In the beginning God created the sky and the earth.



quote:
Genesis 1:1 (The Message)

Genesis 1
Heaven and Earth
1-2First this: God created the Heavens and Earth—all you see, all you don't see. Earth was a soup of nothingness, a bottomless emptiness, an inky blackness. God's Spirit brooded like a bird above the watery abyss.


Which one Bill? Do you see how even a simple statement can be interpreted so many ways?
quote:
Originally posted by Bama Bunny:
speaking of new threads, Why are some religous people anti - yoga???? I love yoga.......


i hadn't heard this, BaBunny.

i imagine it's because with hard core yoga there can involve a touch of the spiritual and mystical.
it doesn't have to, by any means, but with a fundy suggesting that inner peace through yoga is a spiritual thing makes them scream hellfire and heresy. Jesus didn't do Yoga, so you'll just downward facing dog your way to hell.

personally i think treating yoga as anythign other than an excellent exersize is just plain old silly, but other peopel are allowed to believe as they like.
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:

So, yes, B50 and Nagel, we all need mature Christian leaders, pastors, and teachers to help us better understand the Word of God.


i never said we didn't.

what i said was that we didn't need YOU or people like you.

i don't need someone to tell me what the bible says. i read very very well, thanks just the same.
IF the bible is the literal word of god, then he wouldn't have written so that your average person person couldn't have understood it.

that's just kinda stupid. if only those who have been touched by the holy spirit can really understand what it means, how would he ever get converts?
someone would read it, and say 'this doesn't make sense' and walk away.

saying you have to have been graced by the spirit BEFORE you can understand it is like saying you can't get in the water until you know how to swim.

if you already believe and are saved, you can understand it, but if your seeking to be saved, you don't have a clue?

what kind of sense does that make?

quote:

You tell me that Nagel is an ordained minister who does "not (want to) influence other people's reading of the Bible." Then, what is, or was, his purpose for becoming an ordained minister? If not to share the Word of God, teach the Word of God, and to tell folks about Jesus Christ and the "free gift" of salvation He offers to all of us -- then, what is the purpose of being a minister?


my reasons are my own, and are between God and I. you aren't a part of the equation.

in little words you might understand - it's none of your business.
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
I don't want to sidetrack to the yoga thing so read this.
http://www.cbn.com/health/fitn...oga-alternative.aspx

Good Grief!


PLEAse .. God.. Sidetrack it.. it's just another Bill Rant. nothign important.

i read the article.
i'm stunned. i'm stuck. i really don't knwo whether to laugh at their stupidity, or cry because they seem to believe it.

Bunny. you go on and keep exersizing.
these people are insane.

i suppose if you chanted prayers to Shiva and brahma while you did yoga there might be a problem, but other wise it's just a stupendously silly concept.
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
quote:
Yes, I would! But, who will lead the discussions? A discussion without a leader is sort of like a hen house without noise control.

There doesn't have to be a leader. Anyone can put up a scripture and then give their two cents. Nobody condemns another's point of view, there are no ad hominem attacks, and we all learn.
Nobody gets to be the only 'right' answer.

Let's start with:
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.
quote:
Amplified version:
Genesis 1
1IN THE beginning God (prepared, formed, fashioned, and) created the heavens and the earth.(A)

quote:
Genesis 1:1 (New Living Translation)

Genesis 1
The Account of Creation
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.[a]

Footnotes:

1. Genesis 1:1 Or In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth, . . . Or When God began to create the heavens and the earth, . . .

quote:
Genesis 1:1 (New Century Version)

Genesis 1
The Beginning of All Things
The Beginning of the World
1 In the beginning God created the sky and the earth.

quote:
Genesis 1:1 (The Message)

Genesis 1
Heaven and Earth
1-2First this: God created the Heavens and Earth—all you see, all you don't see. Earth was a soup of nothingness, a bottomless emptiness, an inky blackness. God's Spirit brooded like a bird above the watery abyss.


Which one Bill? Do you see how even a simple statement can be interpreted so many ways?

Hi B,

Quite honestly, I would not use any of those -- and especially not Peterson's The Message, which is a loose paraphrase and not even a translation.

I would stay with the NASB, NKJV, NIV, and sometimes, the KJV. With these as a reference point, you will get a good reading of the Bible.

But, a discussion without a leader -- is a mob. Just my thoughts. Why don't you volunteer to be leader?

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
Bill,

I disagree that an ordained minister must have a Master's degree from a seminary. Many do but it is not a prerequisite for ordaination. I know several competent ordained ministers that do not hold that degree. I do always want to know who ordained a minister before I listen to them because for me that does lend credence to the minister.

b50m,

If you think that no one on here is condemned for their point of view then obviously you have not been reading the same forums that I have or else you have a short memory. I have certainly felt condemned by several posters because I believe in once saved always saved. I have not condemned those that believe differently on this subject but there has been quite a bit of condemnation for those holding this belief.
You know there is a definite pattern here I have noticed. Most of BG's threads start off with "In the thread posted by_______(fill in blank). He never seems to have an original idea of his own. And by the way, I wonder how many of the "views" on his threads are just like me? Most of the time if I click on one he started, it's just to read the replys.
quote:
b50m,

If you think that no one on here is condemned for their point of view then obviously you have not been reading the same forums that I have or else you have a short memory. I have certainly felt condemned by several posters because I believe in once saved always saved. I have not condemned those that believe differently on this subject but there has been quite a bit of condemnation for those holding this belief.



SR, I was saying that to have discussions we need to stop that. Bill wanted honest discussions yet he is the one belittling other views. I have jumped him back whe my patience has reached its end. So if we could all agree to just discuss, it would be great.

quote:
Yes, I would! But, who will lead the discussions? A discussion without a leader is sort of like a hen house without noise control.--Bill


There doesn't have to be a leader. Anyone can put up a scripture and then give their two cents. Nobody condemns another's point of view, there are no ad hominem attacks, and we all learn.
Nobody gets to be the only 'right' answer.
quote:
Originally posted by Shoals Resident:
Bill,

I disagree that an ordained minister must have a Master's degree from a seminary. Many do but it is not a prerequisite for ordaination. I know several competent ordained ministers that do not hold that degree. I do always want to know who ordained a minister before I listen to them because for me that does lend credence to the minister.

b50m,

If you think that no one on here is condemned for their point of view then obviously you have not been reading the same forums that I have or else you have a short memory. I have certainly felt condemned by several posters because I believe in once saved always saved. I have not condemned those that believe differently on this subject but there has been quite a bit of condemnation for those holding this belief.

Hi Shoals,

That is true. A person does not have to have a degree to be ordained. Actually, it is up to the church doing the ordination. Most denominational churches require the degree. However, at Calvary Chapel, which has many great pastors, they attend Bible College and not a seminary. Pastor Chuck often jokingly changes the word to "cemetery" instead of seminary. He graduated from a seminary.

And, a pastor can be commissioned without being ordained. I have a good friend, Charles, who was commissioned, but not ordained, just before his wedding. They went on a cruise for their honeymoon. On the cruise ship, they met a young couple and became friends with them. The couple wanted to be married at sea -- but, Charles was not sure if he was authorized to perform the wedding.

Charles called our senior pastor on ship to shore radio to ask if he could perform the wedding. When told that he could, he was able to marry the young couple while on his own honeymoon. Made it rather special for both couples.

Charles went on to seminary at Biola and now is an ordained pastor -- and they have five children. See the danger in marrying a pastor? He takes that "be fruitful and multiply" in Genesis 1:28 too seriously!

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_Piggy_Bear_TEXT-1
quote:
Originally posted by paw-paw:
You know there is a definite pattern here I have noticed. Most of BG's threads start off with "In the thread posted by_______(fill in blank). He never seems to have an original idea of his own. And by the way, I wonder how many of the "views" on his threads are just like me? Most of the time if I click on one he started, it's just to read the replys.

THERE! - YOU SEE! - WE ALL BENEFIT WHEN I START A NEW DISCUSSION!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1_-__Snoopy_Running
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
quote:
Originally posted by Shoals Resident:
Bill,

I disagree that an ordained minister must have a Master's degree from a seminary. Many do but it is not a prerequisite for ordaination. I know several competent ordained ministers that do not hold that degree. I do always want to know who ordained a minister before I listen to them because for me that does lend credence to the minister.

b50m,

If you think that no one on here is condemned for their point of view then obviously you have not been reading the same forums that I have or else you have a short memory. I have certainly felt condemned by several posters because I believe in once saved always saved. I have not condemned those that believe differently on this subject but there has been quite a bit of condemnation for those holding this belief.

Hi Shoals,

That is true. A person does not have to have a degree to be ordained. Actually, it is up to the church doing the ordination. Most denominational churches require the degree. However, at Calvary Chapel, which has many great pastors, they attend Bible College and not a seminary. Pastor Chuck often jokingly changes the word to "cemetery" instead of seminary. He graduated from a seminary.

And, a pastor can be commissioned without being ordained. I have a good friend, Charles, who was commissioned, but not ordained, just before his wedding. They went on a cruise for their honeymoon. On the cruise ship, they met a young couple and became friends with them. The couple wanted to be married at sea -- but, Charles was not sure if he was authorized to perform the wedding.

Charles called our senior pastor on ship to shore radio to ask if he could perform the wedding. When told that he could, he was able to marry the young couple while on his own honeymoon. Made it rather special for both couples.

Charles went on to seminary at Biola and now is an ordained pastor -- and they have five children. See the danger in marrying a pastor? He takes that "be fruitful and multiply" in Genesis 1:28 too seriously!

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill


Bill, do you believe that a "pastor" (bishop, elder) must meet the qualifications for that office as set forth in I Timothy 3 and Titus 1?

If you believe that these qualifications are required, they you must also agree that there should be no unmarried "pastors" or married "pastors" who have no children. Those scriptures make it plain that a pastor is to be married and to have believing children. What say you?
quote:
Originally posted by Shoals Resident:
If you think that no one on here is condemned for their point of view then obviously you have not been reading the same forums that I have or else you have a short memory. I have certainly felt condemned by several posters because I believe in once saved always saved. I have not condemned those that believe differently on this subject but there has been quite a bit of condemnation for those holding this belief.


don't feel that way SR.

yes, several of us have voiced, at times rudely, a disbelief in the once saved always saved idea, but please notice, we aren't trying ot be rude abotu the concept, but abotu the way bill presents it.

i don't recall you saying anything that implied you know the one truth, and everyone else was dead wrong.

bill says that on a daily basis, so there are several of us who are trying to prevent twisted scripture from causeing someone to be lost from god by bills fake gospel.

i think the unspoken rule on this forum seems to be 'don't condemn me, i won't condemn you'

doesn't mean we have to agree, just means we don't attack each other.
it's a good thing. it causes a situation that engenders mutual respect and a free and open sharing of ideas, thoughts and feelings, and causes a deeper understanding of different faiths, beliefs, convictions and it causes us to better understand each other as people, and sometimes even ourselves.

bill attacks everyone, the only thing he'll ever understand is what he thinks he already knows, and he doesn't have any idea how to share anything other than long sprawling lectures to tell us how he is right and we are wrong.
quote:
If you believe that these qualifications are required, they you must also agree that there should be no unmarried "pastors" or married "pastors" who have no children. Those scriptures make it plain that a pastor is to be married and to have believing children. What say you?


Beter, this is exactly what we were discussing on the other thread- Timothy 1 and Titus 3 were among the scriptures I referenced, if my memory serves me. And the one about Malcezidak.
So by Biblical definition, these qualifications are all upheld by a priest- although the term "priest" is questionable. Are we on the same page?
quote:
don't feel that way SR.

yes, several of us have voiced, at times rudely, a disbelief in the once saved always saved idea, but please notice, we aren't trying ot be rude abotu the concept, but abotu the way bill presents it.

i don't recall you saying anything that implied you know the one truth, and everyone else was dead wrong.

bill says that on a daily basis, so there are several of us who are trying to prevent twisted scripture from causeing someone to be lost from god by bills fake gospel.

i think the unspoken rule on this forum seems to be 'don't condemn me, i won't condemn you'


Sorry you feel that way, SR, I apologize if I have been rude to you in any way- certainly not my intention.
I agree with Nagel 100percent. We can disagree while maintaining friendship and integrity.
Hi Beter,

You ask, "Bill, do you believe that a "pastor" (bishop, elder) must meet the qualifications for that office as set forth in I Timothy 3 and Titus 1?

If you believe that these qualifications are required, they you must also agree that there should be no unmarried "pastors" or married "pastors" who have no children. Those scriptures make it plain that a pastor is to be married and to have believing children. What say you?"


1 Timothy 3:2-5, "An overseer, then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but gentle, peaceable, free from the love of money. He must be one who manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with all dignity (but if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?)."

Titus 1:5-6, "For this reason I left you in Crete, that you would set in order what remains and appoint elders in every city as I directed you, namely, if any man is above reproach, the husband of one wife -- having children who believe, not accused of dissipation or rebellion."

No, these passages say that an elder or pastor, spiritual leaders of the local church, must be the husband of one wife, i.e., not like the Jews of in the Old Testament who had multiple wives -- against the desire of God. It does not say that he must be married -- but, if he is married, he must be the husband of only one wife. And, these passages tell us that, if he has children, his children are to be well disciplined.

And, in 1 Timothy 3:8-13, we are given the same guidelines for Deacons.

What was the apostle Paul's view on marriage for elders and was Paul ever married? We cannot be sure from the Bible if Paul was ever married. We know he was a Pharisee (Acts 23:6) and some have suggested that all Pharisees were married. But, again, this is not clear in the Bible.

In 1 Corinthians 7:8 Paul tells us, "But I say to the unmarried and to widows that it is good for them if they remain even as I." From this we must say that Paul was not married.

And, in 1 Corinthians 7:20 Paul tells us, "Each man must remain in that condition in which he was called."

In 1 Corinthians 7:24-27 Paul tells us, "Brethren, each one is to remain with God in that condition in which he was called. Now concerning virgins I have no command of the Lord, but I give an opinion as one who by the mercy of the Lord is trustworthy. I think then that this is good in view of the present distress, that it is good for a man to remain as he is. Are you bound to a wife? Do not seek to be released. Are you released from a wife? Do not seek a wife."

So, from these Scripture passages, we would have to say that Paul, who most certainly was an elder and pastor -- does not believe that a man must be married and have children to be an elder or pastor. But, if a man is married -- he is to be the husband of only one wife, not married to multiple wives at the same time. And, if he has children, he must discipline his children.

Beter, I pray that I have answered your question.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
New Living Translation
http://www.biblegateway.com/pa...ians%207&version=NLT

 8 So I say to those who aren’t married and to widows—it’s better to stay unmarried, just as I am. 9 But if they can’t control themselves, they should go ahead and marry. It’s better to marry than to burn with lust.

 10 But for those who are married, I have a command that comes not from me, but from the Lord.[b] A wife must not leave her husband. 11 But if she does leave him, let her remain single or else be reconciled to him. And the husband must not leave his wife.
quote:
I Timothy 3

1 Timothy 3 (New Living Translation)


Leaders in the Church
1 This is a trustworthy saying: “If someone aspires to be an elder,[a] he desires an honorable position.” 2 So an elder must be a man whose life is above reproach. He must be faithful to his wife.(b) He must exercise self-control, live wisely, and have a good reputation. He must enjoy having guests in his home, and he must be able to teach. 3 He must not be a heavy drinker[c] or be violent. He must be gentle, not quarrelsome, and not love money. 4 He must manage his own family well, having children who respect and obey him. 5 For if a man cannot manage his own household, how can he take care of God’s church?

6 An elder must not be a new believer, because he might become proud, and the devil would cause him to fall.[d] 7 Also, people outside the church must speak well of him so that he will not be disgraced and fall into the devil’s trap.

8 In the same way, deacons must be well respected and have integrity. They must not be heavy drinkers or dishonest with money. 9 They must be committed to the mystery of the faith now revealed and must live with a clear conscience. 10 Before they are appointed as deacons, let them be closely examined. If they pass the test, then let them serve as deacons.

11 In the same way, their wives[e] must be respected and must not slander others. They must exercise self-control and be faithful in everything they do.

12 A deacon must be faithful to his wife, and he must manage his children and household well. 13 Those who do well as deacons will be rewarded with respect from others and will have increased confidence in their faith in Christ Jesus.

# a 1 Timothy 3:1 Or an overseer, or a bishop; also in 3:2, 6.
# b 1 Timothy 3:2 Or must have only one wife, or must be married only once; Greek reads must be the husband of one wife; also in 3:12.
# c 1 Timothy 3:3 Greek must not drink too much wine; similarly in 3:8.
# d 1 Timothy 3:6 Or he might fall into the same judgment as the devil.
# e 1 Timothy 3:11 Or the women deacons. The Greek word can be translated women or wives.

I put this up because of that last footnote. How many of you believe that the church had women deacons?
Don't you just love all these different interpretations?
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
# e 1 Timothy 3:11 Or the women deacons. The Greek word can be translated women or wives.

I put this up because of that last footnote. How many of you believe that the church had women deacons? Don't you just love all these different interpretations?

Hi O,

The New Living Bible or Living Bible is not a Bible translation -- but, instead is a paraphrased Bible. It is more like a commentary than a Bible -- and no serious Bible study can be based upon a paraphrase.

However, your point about women being Deaconesses in a church is valid. There is no Biblical restraint against a woman being Deaconess -- only for a woman being an elder or pastor.

As a matter of fact, my wife was a Deaconess in her church in the Philippines before coming to America. Not a problem in any church I know.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
quote:
Originally posted by O No!:
Um, I think you meant to address that to B50, not to me.

Hi O,

You are so right! I ask both you and B50 to accept my apology.

Just blame it on my youth. You know how we youngsters get excited and start our mouth (or keyboard) before putting our minds into gear. Yes, we young folks do get impetuous at times.

But, seriously, I do apologize for the mixup.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Spaghetti_Boy_1b_SORRY
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
No problem. The Living translation does add a bit of interest though.

Hi B50,

I am not saying that folks should not read paraphrased Bibles. Just that they need to be aware that this is not truly the Bible; but, only a commentary on the Bible. And, often, not a good commentary.

But, if reading The Message, as many folks did when it first came out, will encourage people to then graduate to a true Bible translation -- it can be a good thing.

The biggest problem is that many folks reading the paraphrases actually are misled into believing they are reading the Bible.

And, when doing a serious Bible study -- in a corporate study or in a personal study -- I definitely would recommend getting a true Bible.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×