Skip to main content

So what do you want in '08?

Voters are torn between competing cravings: Change or experience in 2008? They are demanding something new, but there is comfort in the tried and true. The public's low opinion of Washington and growing concern about the direction of the country point to 2008 being a "change" election, one like the campaigns of 1976 and 1992 when people looked for a marked departure from the status quo. But the war in Iraq and the rise of global terrorism make for an anxious electorate and could turn this into a "war" election, one like the campaigns of 1944 and 2004 when voters found comfort in the most experienced candidates.

Change versus experience? The White House will likely go to the man or woman who speaks best to both. http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/2583
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by outspokenjerk:
Go Rudy!



Rudy is a good man, he handled NYC really well in the wake of 9/11... BUT how in the world can we expect him to run this country when he cannot even run his own life???

Everyone was all over Clinton for messing around, and now it is okay for Rudy to do it, not once, but TWICE, and get DIVORCED????

Now THAT just sounds so hypocritical!!!!
quote:
Originally posted by mustangfan2003:
can i pick none of the above?



mustangfan!!!! There are at least 17 running, both parties, and I am with you!!

NONE OF THE ABOVE!!! NO ONE has surfaced that would make a leader of our Country...

We cannot make the mistake of trading Bush for someone WORSE, IF there is anyone WORSE!!!

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×