Skip to main content

WASHINGTON – The post office will get an extra 2-cents worth when you mail a letter starting in May.

The U.S. Postal Service announced Tuesday that the price of a first-class stamp will rise to 44 cents on May 11.

That gives plenty of time to stock up on Forever Stamps, which will continue to sell at the current 42-cent rate until the increase occurs. They will remain valid in the future regardless of rate hikes.

"The Postal Service is not immune to rising costs which are affecting homes and businesses across America today," said Postmaster General John Potter. "Even with the increases, the Postal Service continues to offer some of the lowest postage prices in the world."

Postage rates go up annually in May, with the new prices announced in February. The overall change is tied to the rate of inflation in the year before.

While the new 44-cent rate covers the first ounce of first-class mail, the price for each additional ounce will remain unchanged at 17-cents.

Postal officials estimate the increase will cost the average household $3-a-year.

Buffeted by rising costs and declining mail volume, the Postal Service lost $2.8 billion last year and, unless the economy turns around, is headed toward much larger losses this year.

The agency could have cited extraordinary circumstances and asked the independent Postal Regulatory Commission for larger increases, but officials felt that would only result in a greater decline in mail volume.

The post office has been cutting costs, reducing work hours, and has asked Congress to ease requirements for advance funds for retiree benefits and to allow mail to be delivered five days a week instead of six.

Other changes taking effect May 11:

• The postcard stamp increases 1-cent to 28 cents.

• The first ounce of a large envelope increases 5 cents to 88 cents.

• The first ounce of a parcel increases 5 cents to $1.22.

• New international postcard and letter prices are, for one ounce, 75 cents to Canada; 79 cents to Mexico; and 98 cents elsewhere.

Most Postal Service shipping services prices were adjusted in January and will not change in May.

Y.B.Y.S.A.I.A
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by LMM:
I am so glad I bought 200 of the Forever stamps when they first came out. How can they be hurting so bad when people can now buy things from around the world and pay a lot of postage. Letters may have dropped off, but packages have increased and they get $8 or $9 bucks a pop.


I know to send packages to my wife at sea (Navy) I pay roughly 70 bucks for three boxes. This last time I was told that one of my boxes didn't weigh enough for the size and I had a fee for that.
quote:
Originally posted by LMM:
You paid a fee because it was underweight? How funny.
Your wife is in the military too? Do you get to be together much? Just curious, hope I'm not too nosy. Smiler
We have spent 1 Christmas together (last year) zero anniversaries, I wasn't there for my daughter's birth. We may have spent 3-4 months together since we married (per year. I don't ever look forward to birthdays. She is suppose to return in 2 months but I deploy again in Aug. Its very hard with one Army and one Navy but some how some way we make it work.

The box fell under the Priority Mail Balloon Rate:



Weight less than 20 pounds and

• Length plus girth combined is more than 84 but not more than 108 inches.

In this example, length and girth is 90 inches.
Do you remember when the post office said they were going to offer a "verified e-mail" service? They were going to charge a fee for you to send e-mail through them. I guess I can't blame them for trying.

So now they want to cut down deliveries to 5 days and raise prices again. Meanwhile, over at UPS, the accountants are sharpening their pencils and waiting to see how things go for them. FedEx is probably biting their nails hoping to grab a bite. After e-mail the only thing left is packages and certified mail.

Now raising prices for a light weight package? Makes you want to say, "Hold on a second". Then you step outside a grab a few rocks to throw in the box. That just doesn't make sense to me. I guess they think it is lost revenue because they could be carrying something heavy in that space and charging extra for weight. Or maybe it is like the fuel cost adjustment on my power bill, a good excuse to frisk you some more.

If I were the decision maker on this increase I would make a deal with them. If they would send packages to and from all United States military personnel overseas for a dramatically reduced amount I would be willing to submit to a increase on my postage to cover it. I would be willing to let them have a reasonable upper weight limit for the packages to the military. But it makes sense to me.
quote:
Originally posted by flotown79:
Well deployed people are able to send letters (under 13 oz.) to the states for free. So I guess that is their way of doing their part. Then after a little research I found out the DOD pays for this. So it boils down to the tax payers paying.


This is one hit on my tax dollars that I don't mind at all. These folks are away from home for months on end serving their country, often with little or no thanks. I'm glad to help them keep in contact with home.
quote:
Originally posted by flotown79:
Well deployed people are able to send letters (under 13 oz.) to the states for free. So I guess that is their way of doing their part. Then after a little research I found out the DOD pays for this. So it boils down to the tax payers paying.



If you are deployed you should not have to pay postage on anything you send home to loved ones.JMHO
quote:
Originally posted by AlabamaSon:
Do you remember when the post office said they were going to offer a "verified e-mail" service? They were going to charge a fee for you to send e-mail through them. I guess I can't blame them for trying.

So now they want to cut down deliveries to 5 days and raise prices again. Meanwhile, over at UPS, the accountants are sharpening their pencils and waiting to see how things go for them. FedEx is probably biting their nails hoping to grab a bite. After e-mail the only thing left is packages and certified mail.

Now raising prices for a light weight package? Makes you want to say, "Hold on a second". Then you step outside a grab a few rocks to throw in the box. That just doesn't make sense to me. I guess they think it is lost revenue because they could be carrying something heavy in that space and charging extra for weight. Or maybe it is like the fuel cost adjustment on my power bill, a good excuse to frisk you some more.

If I were the decision maker on this increase I would make a deal with them. If they would send packages to and from all United States military personnel overseas for a dramatically reduced amount I would be willing to submit to a increase on my postage to cover it. I would be willing to let them have a reasonable upper weight limit for the packages to the military. But it makes sense to me.


It is called "deming" and yes we at FedEx will charge if you if you send a large package that does not weigh much. You are correct it is because the package takes up the space of others. In my opinion if you are serving your country you should be able to ship anything personal for free thru the USPS.
Time to buy more 'forever' stamps, I guess.

Speaking of postage...

I was listening to Mike and Mike in ESPN radio the other day. Mike Golic was telling a story about his older son, who is at Notre Dame. During his Freshman year, he sent his mom a birthday card from college. It arrived bearing a one cent stamp and a 'postage due' notice. They asked the boy about it and he said, "They asked me what kind of stamp I wanted and I just bought the cheapest one." This high school graduate didn't understand how postage works!

So, I decided to ask some teenagers, "If you were going to mail a letter, what kind of stamp would you use?"

The answers ranged from "The cheapest." to "One cent."

Ask a teenager and let me know how they answer! I guess this is something they don't think about and no one bothers to explain it to them.
In my life time, penny post cards and two cent letters. Somewhere in a drawer, I still have a white envelope with a blue two cent embossed G. Washington stamp, never used, probably has collector value.

This is a fine example of how inefficiently the government runs a business. They have a monopoly so they can be as inefficient and wasteful as they choose and when they need more money, just squeeze it out of their best customer.
I love pretty graphs. I'm working on an analogy with beautiful, fickle women. Not there, yet.

If one were to take the data behind this particular graph, and use percent of change instead of nominal, the graph would look much different.

Just from an eyeballing, I'm thinking postal rates are keeping up with changes in wages and fuel use/cost. Could be wrong. In any event, the skyrocket shape of the graph is misleading.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • chartuspostage

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×