Stealing the election.
If you go back to 1960, JFK was accused of stealing the election. In 2000, Bush was accused of stealing the election. In 2004, Bush again was accused of stealing the election.
Let's say all the above is true, that the election was stolen from each of these candidates.
In 1960 could it be that JFK was able to steal the election and Nixon did not have the money to fight it in the courts?
Could the same incident happen in 2000, Bush had the money to fight it in the courts and Gore did not? And the same in 2004, Bush had the money and Kerry did not?
Now if it happens this time with Obama and McCain, it seems that Obama will have the money to fight it in the courts verses McCain will not.
This is just something I was thinking about today and I would like to know your thoughts on it if any. Thanks. JJ
Original Post