Skip to main content

"Stephen Hawking, the world-renowned physicist and celebrity, has canceled a planned trip to Israel, where he was invited to participate in a conference sponsored by Israeli president Shimon Peres. His explanation: “I have received a number of emails from Palestinian academics. They are unanimous that I should respect the boycott. In view of this, I must withdraw from the conference.” http://www.nationalreview.com/...arped-moral-calculus

    hahaha the lying little devil hates Leonard Susskind a Jew [and also the atheist] That's why he won't go to Israel. Hawkings spent a-way-too-much time trying to wear his atheist pants and make silly little videos about his belief that God is not necessary for the creation. Susskind ate his lunch disproving [after 28 years] Hawking's claim that all information was lost in the evaporation of a black hole. Hawking lies as he goes about cosmology by making stuff up. What is funny is ole Susskind lies too and nobody can catch him. Susskind just couldn't keep hizzelf from outing ole Hawking and making the lies transparent. LOL

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Here is an interesting read. 

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08...ewanted=all&_r=0

 

Hawking has long been known for his support of humanitarian issues. I have no doubt that is why he has refused to attend. Dr. Susskind is a brilliant man and well respected, even by Hawking. From the article above it looks like there may come a time when Dr. Susskind will be the one conceding to Hawking on the matter. I love that they don't know all the answers. Who don't love a mystery?

Originally Posted by frog:

What is the big deal?  Maybe he just didn't feel it was right for him, and it doesn't necessarily mean he hates anyone or any group.

Use your brain...

Think now..

Look at the Original Poster...? 

QuailDung...

Do you really think...there is "merit" to his/hers   post?

He's just a "troll" lookin' for a ...?

It would be nice to have the black hole in a lab condition where it can be studied. so far we haven't observed one anywhere in the universe. oh I know there are some things out there that they think are but no absolute proof they even exist.

Susskind thinks they exist and he addresses the information paradox in his string theory proof.  lecture #4  he is a slick talker so don't get lost.http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=String+Theory+Quantum+Physics+Theory&FORM=RESTAB#view=detail&mid=CF95C7AA4D1E9B3BA386CF95C7AA4D1E9B3BA386

It was a joke folks. Susskind and the l’il devil Hawkings were and are friends after the “War of the Black Holes. I just thought it was funny because Susskind is a Jew.

 

Susskind BTW is my favorite lying physicist but like most I cannot prove his mathematics in error but I do know his math has it's limitations. Consider the constants of Planck. They are all arguable and not exact but are used in all Susskind's proofs. His string theory proofs are laced with assumed values. Too many things are equal to "one" for convenience such as the speed of light in calculations because the speed of light is "one" since nothing with mass can attain its speed but that is ignored in the case of 'entanglement" where information between entangled particles occur at greater than the speed of light[ they say] anywhere from instantaneous to [some posits ] of c times 10 to the 4th. might as well be instant but that is an example of convenient hand-waving for so many mathematical arguments. 

Other strange things: according to cosmology scientists, the universe is expanding exponentially and our stuff is therefore becoming farther apart and the density of stuff in the universe is becoming less [that is except in the case of Andromeda which is claimed to be moving at us at some speed]. While the stuff in the universe is becoming less dense per unit area [the analogy being points on a rubber sheet being stretched at the corners], vacuum energy density [present in empty space] is always the same no matter how much the universe expands. [Susskind lecture 9, topics of string theory] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnItLp3NR5I

 

 Keep in mind mass and energy are the same thing.

Keeping in mind at 1:56 into the lecture Susskind says: "string theory is mathematically consistent....it is super symmetric, but our world is not super symmetric....string theory is not the real world.....in that sense we know now, no question, String Theory is not the right theory.

 

   If it is not our world, we have spent an enormous amount of time and money on BS. Universities are full world over trying to explain it.

 

 While I agree with Susskind;[who helped invent it] it is mathematically consistent, precise, exact and the likelihood someone will find it otherwise is almost impossible, that it is just one in many theories such as the Big Bang that ultimately is no more than hobby. there is a good side to the BS. It makes jobs, the spin-offs of study are great but in the end does not replace as fact the tales of ancient sheepherders.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×