Sad...
Attachments
Images (1)
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Yep, it is sad. This idiot president has sent our military into war and now will not sign a bill to fund them, yet he keeps them over there.
Congress has done it's part (almost twice) in giving him a funding bill. Idiot has not done his part.
Bush should be impeached!!!!
Congress has done it's part (almost twice) in giving him a funding bill. Idiot has not done his part.
Bush should be impeached!!!!
He won't sign a funding bill with unrealistic strings attached from the democrats. Then the dems can say "Bush isn't funding the war" and people will believe it and vote for a democrat next election. The military should receive proper funding, well developed strategies, and the time needed to complete their task. Instead they are stuck over there with funds running out and no long range plan for stabilization and withdrawal.
Get the job over with quick, then get them home. The republicans and democrats are simply drawing this out longer with their stupid bickering. Both parties are responsible for us being over there and now they are too busy arguing about who's to blame instead of trying to solve the problem. I have a solution to the problem, come next election, vote libertarian.
Get the job over with quick, then get them home. The republicans and democrats are simply drawing this out longer with their stupid bickering. Both parties are responsible for us being over there and now they are too busy arguing about who's to blame instead of trying to solve the problem. I have a solution to the problem, come next election, vote libertarian.
congressional BS is totally invisible, its always the presidents fault. now thats gonna solve EVERYTHING! 
quote:Originally posted by NashBama:
He won't sign a funding bill with unrealistic strings attached from the democrats. Then the dems can say "Bush isn't funding the war" and people will believe it and vote for a democrat next election. The military should receive proper funding, well developed strategies, and the time needed to complete their task. Instead they are stuck over there with funds running out and no long range plan for stabilization and withdrawal.
Get the job over with quick, then get them home. The republicans and democrats are simply drawing this out longer with their stupid bickering. Both parties are responsible for us being over there and now they are too busy arguing about who's to blame instead of trying to solve the problem. I have a solution to the problem, come next election, vote libertarian.
Actually the correct VERBAGE is that he won't sign anything the Democrats, AND the Republicans (MANY REPUBLICANS have jumped OFF of Bush's ship) has put in front of him, period.... He is being an arrogant rear side, and his EGO is hurting Americans, and our Troops, as we speak!!!
He veto's because he is a Power hungry, Egotistical tyrant.
And to think I got took to task a couple of days ago for getting "off topic". I still think I see some OC symptoms...
Oh, well...the pot's obviously black, too.
Oh, well...the pot's obviously black, too.
What Job, NashBama?quote:Originally posted by NashBama:
He won't sign a funding bill with unrealistic strings attached from the democrats. Then the dems can say "Bush isn't funding the war" and people will believe it and vote for a democrat next election. The military should receive proper funding, well developed strategies, and the time needed to complete their task. Instead they are stuck over there with funds running out and no long range plan for stabilization and withdrawal.
Get the job over with quick, then get them home. The republicans and democrats are simply drawing this out longer with their stupid bickering. Both parties are responsible for us being over there and now they are too busy arguing about who's to blame instead of trying to solve the problem. I have a solution to the problem, come next election, vote libertarian.
Is the Hussain regime over? yes.
Is The Chemical Weapons Program stopped? Yes
Is the biological Weapons Program ended? Yes
Is the Nuclear Weapons Program finished off? Yes
Have we installed a new government? Yes
Does that government support the interests of the USA? Maybe.
Well, NashBama, there you have it, we haven't gotten a guarantee of the government that will support American Interests. I guess the Iraqi people just elected the wrong representatives.
Either the people who are running that government are not acceptable to the Iraqi People, or the Iraqi People are just NUCKIN' FUTS. They either elect the people we want then to elect, and like it, or we will treat them like the Palestinians who elected Hamas.
NashBama, the Bush Doctrine is "WORLD DOMINATION BY FORCE." He will not be satisfied without it.
The Insurgent's Doctrine is "Give us Liberty or give us death." They will not be satisfied without it.
Stop being an apologist for Domination of the world, and start acting like an American.
I agree, vote Libertarian if you want, but between now and the next election GET US OUT OF IRAQ.
quote:Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
And to think I got took to task a couple of days ago for getting "off topic". I still think I see some OC symptoms...
Oh, well...the pot's obviously black, too.
I sincerely hope you were not talking about me here, because all I was doing was going with the flow of the conversation ... and the conversation and cartoon IS about politics... so please tell me how I am off topic????
OH, maybe because I didn't mention the word AUGUST in my reply? Dang, I am very very sorry!!!!!
Please open a clinic, you seem to (think) that you are very good at diagnosing online Oooops, sorry about that too... Last AUGUST maybe it was when you told us you were a cop... NOT a phychiatrist!!!!
quote:Originally posted by Kindred_Spirit:quote:Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
And to think I got took to task a couple of days ago for getting "off topic". I still think I see some OC symptoms...
Oh, well...the pot's obviously black, too.
I sincerely hope you were not talking about me here, because all I was doing was going with the flow of the conversation ... and the conversation and cartoon IS about politics... so please tell me how I am off topic????
OH, maybe because I didn't mention the word AUGUST in my reply? Dang, I am very very sorry!!!!!
Oooops, sorry about that too... Last AUGUST maybe it was when you told us you were a cop... NOT a phychiatrist!!!!
IF you throw a stone into a pack of dogs, the one that gets hit is the one that yelps. If you can't figure out what I'm talking about (and you obviously haven't), I'm not going to point it out.
Yep, a cop has to be a psychiatrist, a doctor, a lawyer, a marriage counsellor, a locksmith and a mechanic...and do it on less than half the salary of any of them.
So why would I need a clinic, if I can do such accurate diagnosis on line?
