Skip to main content

Jarretta Hamilton was excited as could be when she found she was pregnant with her sixth child--until she found out that child would cost her her job.

 

  A widower and mother of five children from her first marriage, Hamilton was working as a fourth grade teacher at the Southerland Christian School in Saint Cloud, Florida when she met Samuel Treftz and started dating. They got engaged and three weeks before they said I do, she conceived her daughter.

  But when she went to the school to ask for a standard six-week maternity leave in the fall, she says they first balked at the cost to cover her, then questioned her conception date. Soon after she was terminated from her position due to "fornication, sex outside of marriage." And, she says, they told all her co-workers about it, too.

Seriously? I mean, sure, in an ideal world, teachers would serve as role models to their students. But this isn't exactly Pamela Smart, convicted of having sex with her students and convincing them to murder her husband, now is it? This is an adult woman, conceiving a child, out of love, with the man she planned to marry 21 days later. Heck, she could have just lied and kept her job. But because she was honest to a very invasive, unfair question asked the administration, she was given a pink slip instead of a baby shower.

  I could understand a little better if Hamilton had signed some kind of morality contract--specifically stating she would not engage in premarital sex or other such activities--at least she'd know what she was getting into. But she didn't--and she claims she didn't even know she was doing anything wrong. So was it really a case of moral depravity that prompted her dismissal? Or perhaps a school looking to make a costly leave of absence go away?

 

http://shine.yahoo.com/love-se...too-far-1742207.html

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

How could the people at that school not know she was pregnant? They had to know she was a widow.

 

If she didn’t sign any kind of morality contract, specifically stating she would not engage in premarital sex, I don’t see how they could legally fire her. Typical of a Christian school. They don’t want the kids there knowing anything about “the nasty”.

 

Probably just looking for a way to make a costly leave of absence go away. She should sue their azz.

Years ago in Indiana a very well thought of male high school teacher went out to a ;local respectable lounge restaurant with a visiting friend.  The principal arrived durng dinner and told Ned to go home because he should not be in the restaurant where alcohol was served.  Ned, who was an excellent teacher from a good family, quit.  The system lost a good teacher and coach.  It seemed everyone in town but a teacher could go there!  A little off current topic but related!

 

Private school.

A July 20, 2009, letter signed by school administrator Julie Ennis explains why the school's administrators thought they had to fire Hamilton:

"Jarretta was asked not to return because of a moral issue that was disregarded, namely fornication, sex outside of marriage," the letter reads. "The employment application, which she filled out, clearly states that as a leader before our students we require all teachers to maintain and communicate the values and purpose of our school."

The letter declares that sex outside of marriage is immoral and that other pregnant teachers have been able to remain employed with the school because they conceived within marriage.

"We request that Jarretta withdraw her complaint and consider the testimony of the Lord," closed the letter.

 

http://articles.orlandosentine...and-christian-school

Originally Posted by FirenzeVeritas:

"She" was a "widower?"

________________________________

That's what the article said & what Best quoted.

 

"A widower and mother of five children from her first marriage, Hamilton was working as a fourth grade teacher at the Southerland Christian School in Saint Cloud, Florida when she met Samuel Treftz and started dating. They got engaged and three weeks before they said I do, she conceived her daughter."

 


 

Private schools are at liberty to adopt behavioral standards for faculty, staff, administrators and students.  If the standards at this Christian school require that teachers not engage in sex outside of marriage on penalty of being terminated, then the teacher knows that in advance and fornicates at her own risk. The question here, if the case gets to court, should be whether such a required standard was indeed communicated to the teacher when she was hired.

Originally Posted by Contendah:

Private schools are at liberty to adopt behavioral standards for faculty, staff, administrators and students.  If the standards at this Christian school require that teachers not engage in sex outside of marriage on penalty of being terminated, then the teacher knows that in advance and fornicates at her own risk. The question here, if the case gets to court, should be whether such a required standard was indeed communicated to the teacher when she was hired.

 

I could understand a little better if Hamilton had signed some kind of morality contract--specifically stating she would not engage in premarital sex or other such activities--at least she'd know what she was getting into. But she didn't--and she claims she didn't even know she was doing anything wrong.

 


 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×