Skip to main content

Since Bill can never 'find' the questions we ask of him, I thought if we put all the questions in one thread, he will know to check here daily.

How about it Bill? A few that I could remember that you never answered.



Why does the Bible refer to Satan as Lucifer only one time and calls him the bringer of light?

If you divorce for any reason other than adultery, and marry again, are you commiting adultery?

If I follow the 5 solas, can I just sit on my butt and wait for heaven?

If the earth is only 6000 years old, why did God fake it to make it appear older to science?

Why have no T-Rex's been found with all grinding teeth if they ate plants before Adam sinned?

Why do dinosaur bones and human bones differ in age by millions of years? (about 64.5 actually)

Why are there over 100,000 versions of the Christian faith if everything is so easy to understand?

Why do you hate the Roaman Catholic faith?

Why do you think your 'interpetation' of Scripture is the only right one?

Why do you discount science?

Why are you a Baptist that does not believe in the necessity of baptism?


Please add more, my memory is fuzzy this morning.

Remember Bill, all the things you have missed will be here.
Last edited {1}
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Why is it OK for you to listen to your minister, but it isn't OK for Catholics to listen to their preists?

Why is it OK for Baptists to do readings during church services, but when Catholics do it, they are only doing it "by rote"?

And speaking of by rote, why are the Lord's Prayer and the Apostle's Creed OK, but the Rosary isn't "personal" enough?
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
BUMP until Bill answers.


If you think Bill is such a loon, why do you care to have his answers? Why start a thread like this? You're only giving him a stage to make his points that you don't agree with.

I barely know who Bill is, and I have no idea why he's gained such celebrity that you invite him to answer questions. However, I read how ridiculous you think his point of view is yet you encourage him to express it by starting this thread. Find something better to do.
Why?

Becuase he has demanded to have his questions asked, made up lies, insulted everyone on here, then claim no ones asks him any questions.

Argue? Debate. Why are his fundamental views not discussed when he attacks every other religion an condemns all non 'believers.

Just once, I would like him to answer a straight forward question.

As for silly, everyone of those questions is something he brought up.
quote:
Originally posted by Jelb87:
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
BUMP until Bill answers.


If you think Bill is such a loon, why do you care to have his answers? Why start a thread like this? You're only giving him a stage to make his points that you don't agree with.

I barely know who Bill is, and I have no idea why he's gained such celebrity that you invite him to answer questions. However, I read how ridiculous you think his point of view is yet you encourage him to express it by starting this thread. Find something better to do.


DITTO, Its getting old. Leave Bill alone and let him be, put him on ignore but stop your bashing.
Seeing threads all the time calling Bill names and calling him out is crazy. There is an ignore button here, use it!
quote:
DITTO, Its getting old. Leave Bill alone and let him be, put him on ignore but stop your bashing.
Seeing threads all the time calling Bill names and calling him out is crazy. There is an ignore button here, use it!



I don't want to seem hateful but if you don't like what people post in here, instead of trying to force censorship on them, take your own advice and use ignore.
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:

You can't defend your wacky beliefs.


Wouldn't that just be his "truth"?


quote:
You have zero credibility and I hope and pray no one reads your posts.


So you can use prayer to get god to put some kind of spell on the rest of us so we won't read Bill's babbles? Is this similar to those that practice voodoo? Wink
Bfred,
if you think answering questions is being under attack, you should read the religion forum more.

Bill never answers a simple question. He always claims he didn't see them, or nobody asked or he'll get back to you.

I thought if he saw them, he might actually try to answer a few, but I guess Bill practicing what he preaches is a bit mush to ask.

Never mind Bill. You can't do it even when the questions are lined up in front of you. Besides, I can just go to Answers in Genesis and read about T=rex teeth being sharp just because, or fossils records are inaccurate, or God stopped light in mid path to fool us.

I really thought that just once you would actually try to explain your beliefs since you have no problem berating the beliefs of others.

But, I guess as long as you pretend there are no questions, then you don't have to examine why you believe the way you do. You can just go to Chuck for his rulings on faith.

Since you are not a big enough person to engage in an actual dialogue, I'll just go back to skimming past your posts to get to those that have some actual meaning.

But remember how you ducked for cover the next time you start attacking Catholicism, LDS, JW, or any other faith other than your own.
quote:
Originally posted by Jankinonya:
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:

You can't defend your wacky beliefs.


Wouldn't that just be his "truth"?


quote:
You have zero credibility and I hope and pray no one reads your posts.


So you can use prayer to get god to put some kind of spell on the rest of us so we won't read Bill's babbles? Is this similar to those that practice voodoo? Wink


LOL. No, God doesn't do spells.
Bill's beliefs are wacky because he changes scripture to suit his purpose. It may be his 'truth', but he is the kind that would make a great jihadist.
quote:
Originally posted by b50m:
So Bill, as usual, you are all talk and no substance.
You can't defend your wacky beliefs.

You can only lie about other beliefs.

You have zero credibility and I hope and pray no one reads your posts.


And you're just now realizing this? Confused

You & many others are reading his post....and replying to them. You're giving him the attention he craves & a platform to preach his hatred & judgment of most everyone here.
The only reason I can think of that the majority here doesn't have him on ignore is that you enjoy his craziness. Wink
quote:
Originally posted by thenagel:
if He is Omnecient, Why did God plant the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the garden of eden?

if He knew eve would eat the apple, and he would then have to punish them for it, then why did he plant the tree in the first place?


I should probably look this up first; so this is a guess...God wanted an interactive love relationship with humankind because it's really freakin' cool. Furthermore, he could have placed a prostitute/gigolo with a scary venereal disease in the garden, but I find the tree to be a kinder, gentler choice. *snicker*
quote:
Originally posted by _Joy_:
quote:
Originally posted by thenagel:
if He is Omnecient, Why did God plant the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the garden of eden?

if He knew eve would eat the apple, and he would then have to punish them for it, then why did he plant the tree in the first place?


I should probably look this up first; so this is a guess...God wanted an interactive love relationship with humankind because it's really freakin' cool. Furthermore, he could have placed a prostitute/gigolo with a scary venereal disease in the garden, but I find the tree to be a kinder, gentler choice. *snicker*


wouldnt that be lilith?
And Bill never squarely addresses this question on "once-saved, always saved." He danced around it and offered pitiful irrelevant attempts at exegesis, but he ignored the meat of the question:



Okay, Bill, I'm gonna hold you to that. If you are called to refute false teachings, then you need to deal honestly with my longstanding challenge to you concerning your "once saved-always saved" belief. I posted text from II Peter 2 with annotations challenging your views on perseverance and asked you to respond, You have not responded. I must therefore conclude that either (1) you do NOT consider my interpretation of the subject to be "false teachings" or (2) you do consider what I posted to be "false teachings, but thus far you have failed to fulfill your self-assigned obligation to refute them.

So-o-o-o, for your convenience, once more I will post the aforementioned material, in hopes that you will either (1) acknowledge that I have taught the truth or (2) provide your refutation of what I have posted.

Here ya go, Bill. Now show us whether you are all blow and no show, or whether you actually DO what you SAY you do ("As Christian believers we are called to do this; to refute false teachings, to correct false teachers, and to share the Biblical truth.") Which shall it be, Bill? Will you provide an answer with substance, that addresses the issue, or will you cheap out again with some trite and irrelevant quotation or some cutesy cartoon?

This question has been before you a long time, Bill. It is time to either answer it with some kind of credible rebuttal or to acknowledge that the Apostle Peter's teaching trumps Bill's beliefs on the subject! Go for it! The Forum awaits!

You have yet to defend "Eternal security" against the clear and powerful teaching of II Peter 2: I gotcha "eternal security" right heah, Bill. Read it and pay special attention to the highlighted portions and then try to tell me that a saved person can not be lost:

12But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;

13And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;

14Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

15Which have forsaken the right way, {can't 'forsake' something, Bill, without having first accepted it][COLOR:BLACK]and are gone astray[/B][can't go 'astray, Bill,without having first been where one should be][/color] following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;

16But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man's voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

17These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever.

18For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error.

19While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.

20For [b]if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ[/b],[These obviously are persons who at one time "escaped," but who returned to the 'pollutions of the world."] the they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning.

21For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.

22But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and [B]the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.[Washing signifies cleansing, Bill, and the obvious allusion is that these miscreants Peter was describing had indeed once been cleansed of sin, but now had returned to their former lives of willful sinning]See how theologically conservative I am, Bill. I take the Word for what it says. You cherry-pick your Bible and torque passages to extract meaning that is just not there. You have often run from the truth about "eternal security" but you can't hide from the inspired apostolic teaching so clearly set forth by Brother Peter.
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
And Bill never squarely addresses this question on "once-saved, always saved." He danced around it and offered pitiful irrelevant attempts at exegesis, but he ignored the meat of the question:


Okay, Bill, I'm gonna hold you to that. If you are called to refute false teachings, then you need to deal honestly with my longstanding challenge to you concerning your "once saved-always saved" belief. I posted text from II Peter 2 with annotations challenging your views on perseverance and asked you to respond, You have not responded. I must therefore conclude that either (1) you do NOT consider my interpretation of the subject to be "false teachings" or (2) you do consider what I posted to be "false teachings, but thus far you have failed to fulfill your self-assigned obligation to refute them.

22But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and [B]the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.[Washing signifies cleansing, Bill, and the obvious allusion is that these miscreants Peter was describing had indeed once been cleansed of sin, but now had returned to their former lives of willful sinning]See how theologically conservative I am, Bill.

I take the Word for what it says. You cherry-pick your Bible and torque passages to extract meaning that is just not there. You have often run from the truth about "eternal security" but you can't hide from the inspired apostolic teaching so clearly set forth by Brother Peter.



beternU,,,,,Very well said

kraven.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×