Skip to main content

RepubTeaCons are not able to answer the simple question of what they will cut in order to balance the budget. Maybe they are already looking at the 2012 election. NYT poll say:

quote:
people want smaller government that does less rather (55 percent) than a bigger one with more services (36 percent). At the same time, 71 percent oppose reducing social security benefits for future retirees; 54 percent oppose raising the retirement age (42 percent support it); 57 percent oppose not giving social security recipients a raise in benefits this year; and a small majority 45 - 41 do not want the health insurance reform bill repealed.

So Americans - surprise! - want smaller government in theory, but when forced to make any hard choices on spending, balk. Taxes? Surprise! They don't want them raised either - except for those earning over $250,000 a year, but even then only by 48 - 43 margin.



The earmark discussions are just noise, as that is less than $100billion, and along with the pledge to cut $100billion of discretionary spend, means they are still $1000billion short of a nearly balanced budget.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The Reps have decided not to cut anything.

quote:
In the war on Democrats this year, Republicans united behind the pitch for a universal “spending freeze” and “across the board” budget cuts in their promise to reign in the deficit. Falling in line, Republican Rep. Phil Gingrey (GA) assured Americans that he is “committed to finding ways to reduce” government programs that are “bloated” and “riddled with waste.” “With each new appropriations bill Congress considers, I have to ask myself, ‘Is this a good way to spend tax payer dollars,’” he says. “The takeover of the U.S. House by Republicans could prompt a revival of the fight for additional funding for the Marietta-built F-22 stealth fighter, U.S. Rep. Phil Gingrey said Friday. This isn’t just for the sake of home-cooking, but also for the sake of the country,” Gingrey said in a telephone interview.


Despite the overwhelming bipartisan agreement that the plane qualifies as taxpayer waste, such that Defense Secretary Gates concluded “there is no military requirement” for creating more F-22s, and in spite of own his commitment to cutting spending, Gingrey now thinks he knows better than the Pentagon and is calling for resuming production of more F-22s.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×