The times they are a lyin'.
Liberals made simple =
When someone tells a lie then admits they lied by retracting the lie, what do you call those who still believe the lie?
JT & Baby
Again, to quote my earlier post. It can't be proven that the target that Palin posted influenced the idiot shooter, it can be proven that she or her PAC posted it and she approved of it. What part of that can you morons not grasp?
jtdavis posted:Again, to quote my earlier post. It can't be proven that the target that Palin posted influenced the idiot shooter, it can be proven that she or her PAC posted it and she approved of it. What part of that can you morons not grasp?
Kraven, are you saying that the target was not posted?
jtdavis posted:Kraven, are you saying that the target was not posted?
Has anyone said it wasn't posted? Or have they said "so what"? It's no more than you Dems have posted, and had nothing to do with anyone being shot.
jtdavis posted:Kraven, are you saying that the target was not posted?
From one of the most liberal sites in existence, The washington post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...m_term=.4d2310d22cf3
“Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably. In 2011, Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl. At the time, we and others were sharply critical of the heated political rhetoric on the right. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin’s political action committee circulated a map of targeted electoral districts that put Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs. But in that case no connection to the shooting was ever established.”
— New York Times editorial board, June 14
This quote is from a corrected version of a New York Times editorial that had falsely claimed that the gunman in the 2011 Giffords shooting was politically incited by Palin’s political action committee. Many readers asked about the uncorrected version, which initially claimed “the link to political incitement was clear” between the gunman’s actions and the map portraying crosshairs, including one over Giffords’s congressional district in Southern Arizona.
On Jan. 11, 2011 — three days after the shooting — The Fact Checker called this charge “bogus.” Alas, this debunked talking point still exists.
If you tell the same lie 3 times, some people will believe it. If y'all deny something 3 times, y'all claim it didn't happen. It's in print, keep disbelieving.
jtdavis posted:If you tell the same lie 3 times, some people will believe it. If y'all deny something 3 times, y'all claim it didn't happen. It's in print, keep disbelieving.
Who's lying besides you? Is that what you're doing, telling the lie so many times you think others will believe you? Are you saying the articles from the lefty news outlets are lying? The NYT retracted their lie, yet you keep passing it around. She never targeted giffords to begin with, the demoslops have their target maps, and the shooter had a problem with giffords BEFORE Palin ever even ran for VP. You are pathetic, and again this is why I have no respect for you as a person or poster. You are the typical, lying, fake news spreading demoslop. Contact the lefty WP and tell them they're lying.
On Jan. 11, 2011 — three days after the shooting — The Fact Checker called this charge “bogus.” Alas, this debunked talking point still exists. (Because of demoslops like jt)
Then drop huffpo a line.
As even the left-wing HuffPost reiterated Wednesday: “People said Jared Lee Loughner was motivated by politics. Reporting proved them wrong.” Second, Sarah Palin’s map was virtually identical to those used by Democrats for years, depicting targets atop contested congressional districts.
jtdavis posted:If you tell the same lie 3 times, some people will believe it. If y'all deny something 3 times, y'all claim it didn't happen. It's in print, keep disbelieving.
Kraven posted:jtdavis posted:If you tell the same lie 3 times, some people will believe it. If y'all deny something 3 times, y'all claim it didn't happen. It's in print, keep disbelieving.
Obviously Jeff you can not, will not or ever comprehend it,so believe whatever you want to believe. You aren't wiredfor that level of information..
Yep, he's not wired for common sense.
This is a yes or no question. Did Sara Palin, or her supporters, post the targeted areas and put names to them.
jtdavis posted:This is a yes or no question. Did Sara Palin, or her supporters, post the targeted areas and put names to them.
Maybe,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, maybe snot,,,??
Maybe,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, maybe snot,,,??
??????????????????????
jtdavis posted:Maybe,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, maybe snot,,,??
??????????????????????
How many different languages do you speak jt??
Only one, it's southern english
It seems like you can't understand English at all. Southern or other.
I asked for a yes or no. What he posted was maybe and snot. Can you read?
jtdavis posted:I asked for a yes or no. What he posted was maybe and snot. Can you read?
Again, the congressional seats were targeted, not the people. Can't you think? From her own words: "Remember months ago "bullseye" icon used 2 target 20 Obamacare-lovin incumbant seats?"