Skip to main content

jtdavis posted:

Again, to quote my earlier post. It can't be proven that the target that Palin posted influenced the idiot shooter, it can be proven that she or her PAC posted it and she approved of it. What part of that can you morons not grasp?

Only a moron can't grasp Palin didn't cause anyone to be killed.
Only a moron believes everything the moron media tells them and
is too happy to believe it. I should say only the idiots are taken in
by the lying liberal BS because they know the liberal naïve, gullible
and simple minded snowflakes will eat anything they are told by
their masters, the socialist underworld.. Everyone knows that except
the morons... 
jtdavis posted:

Kraven, are you saying that the target was not posted?

Jeff, you're almost as dumb as crash, a location was posted, not a
target, no one was trying to incite a murder. If you want to believe
otherwise, do so, but keep it to yourself, it has been done to death
and only a double stupid idiot would keep trying to push that lie.

From one of the most liberal sites in existence, The washington post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com...m_term=.4d2310d22cf3

 

 

“Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably. In 2011, Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl. At the time, we and others were sharply critical of the heated political rhetoric on the right. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin’s political action committee circulated a map of targeted electoral districts that put Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs. But in that case no connection to the shooting was ever established.”
— New York Times editorial board, June 14

This quote is from a corrected version of a New York Times editorial that had falsely claimed that the gunman in the 2011 Giffords shooting was politically incited by Palin’s political action committee. Many readers asked about the uncorrected version, which initially claimed “the link to political incitement was clear” between the gunman’s actions and the map portraying crosshairs, including one over Giffords’s congressional district in Southern Arizona.

On Jan. 11, 2011 — three days after the shooting — The Fact Checker called this charge “bogus.” Alas, this debunked talking point still exists.

jtdavis posted:

If you tell the same lie 3 times, some people will believe it. If y'all deny something 3 times, y'all claim it didn't happen. It's in print, keep disbelieving.

Who's lying besides you? Is that what you're doing, telling the lie so many times you think others will believe you? Are you saying the articles from the lefty news outlets are lying? The NYT retracted their lie, yet you keep passing it around. She never targeted giffords to begin with, the demoslops have their target maps, and the shooter had a problem with giffords BEFORE Palin ever even ran for VP. You are pathetic, and again this is why I have no respect for you as a person or poster. You are the typical, lying, fake news spreading demoslop. Contact the lefty WP and tell them they're lying.

On Jan. 11, 2011 — three days after the shooting — The Fact Checker called this charge “bogus.” Alas, this debunked talking point still exists. (Because of demoslops like jt)

 Then drop huffpo a line.

As even the left-wing HuffPost reiterated Wednesday: “People said Jared Lee Loughner was motivated by politics. Reporting proved them wrong.” Second, Sarah Palin’s map was virtually identical to those used by Democrats for years, depicting targets atop contested congressional districts.

Last edited by Bestworking
jtdavis posted:

If you tell the same lie 3 times, some people will believe it. If y'all deny something 3 times, y'all claim it didn't happen. It's in print, keep disbelieving.

Obviously Jeff you can not, will not or ever comprehend it,
so believe whatever you want to believe. You aren't wired
for that level of information..
Last edited by Kraven
Kraven posted:
jtdavis posted:

If you tell the same lie 3 times, some people will believe it. If y'all deny something 3 times, y'all claim it didn't happen. It's in print, keep disbelieving.

Obviously Jeff you can not, will not or ever comprehend it,
so believe whatever you want to believe. You aren't wired
for that level of information..

Yep, he's not wired for common sense.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×