Skip to main content

 

David Lane, on of the busiest theocratic scheming weasels in the United States.Keeps a low profile, but is big in financing ultra right wing theocratic initiatives.

 

http://www.splcenter.org/get-i...nce-files/David-Lane

 

Busy helpiing winger preachers get into elective office. Bankrolled this theocrat's unsuccessful run for office in California.

 

Bankrolled this theocrat's unsuccessful run for office in California.

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/...et-involved-politics

 

Those who see no significant threat in the Christian Nationalist/New Apostolic Reformation comp[lex of theocrats need to read about this varmint.  

 

As described above, Mike Huckabee and the American Family Association of radical theocrats are linked with this guy.  He is also associated with the Calvary Chapel cult, Bill Gray's former denomination and one which he continues to defend, notwithstanding their various scandals in California..

I yam what I yam and that's all I yam--but it is enough!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Contendah, my Friend,

 

First, your second URL link does not work.  And, I have been a Christian believer in Southern California for over 27 years -- and I have never heard of this guy, David Lane, who you say is so influential in the Christian community.

 

And, since I became a Christian believer in 1987 -- I have been solely in Baptist churches.  But, I will admit that I have listened to the Calvary Chapel begun KWVE Christian Radio for that full time -- and have learned a lot by listening to the teachings on KWVE, as I grew to Christian maturity over those years.

 

Did I always agree with Pastor Chuck Smith of Calvary Chapel?   No.  But, then, I have never met a Baptist pastor with whom I have agreed 100% during those 27 years.  However, I have learned a lot from all of them -- Baptist and Calvary Chapel.  

 

Am I worried about a "theocracy conspiracy" in America?  No, not really.  For the ONLY true Theocracy will not occur until after the Tribulation when Jesus Christ returns, His Second Coming in Glory, to establish His 1000 year Millennial Reign from the throne of David in Jerusalem.   

 

That WILL be a perfect Theocracy ruled by Jesus Christ.  And we will have true "peace on earth" for 1000 years.    Are YOU ready for it?   For, if you are truly a Christian believer as you tell us -- YOU will be a part of that Theocracy.   I wonder if you will be ASHAMED of that affiliation -- as you are of the supposed church you attend today.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

1 - USA_Flag-Map_Cross-Hands - NEEDS - Outline-1a

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1 - USA_Flag-Map_Cross-Hands - NEEDS - Outline-1a
Last edited by Bill Gray
Originally Posted by Len Hummel:

All that you have said here in this post, Bill, I would say is theologically, prophetically, and biblically sound.

 

How I am looking forward to THE EARTHLY REIGN of The KING of kings and the LORD of lords !

 

Maranatha !  

-------------

And how are things out there in Sycophant City, Len?

I'm sure there will be no answer, but contendah, don't you lefties support, finance, and put into office the ones you want? Dems use religion as much or more than Republicans and go into churches to 'politic', and the churches so called 'pastors' tell the congregation who to vote for. How is that any different? Don't blacks support, push, and vote for black candidates? Even the ones that are half white but called black so they can claim racism on his part too if anyone speaks against them? How about the ones that are known crooks or drug addicts that they repeatedly put into office? Do muslims support, vote for, and push for muslim candidates? How about the ones like yee, that are put into office by criminals? You just never seem to have a problem with them.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

I'm sure there will be no answer, but contendah, don't you lefties support, finance, and put into office the ones you want? Dems use religion as much or more than Republicans and go into churches to 'politic', and the churches so called 'pastors' tell the congregation who to vote for. How is that any different? Don't blacks support, push, and vote for black candidates? Even the ones that are half white but called black so they can claim racism on his part too if anyone speaks against them? How about the ones that are known crooks or drug addicts that they repeatedly put into office? Do muslims support, vote for, and push for muslim candidates? How about the ones like yee, that are put into office by criminals? You just never seem to have a problem with them.

___

As far as I am concerned,anyone of any religious persuasion can legally support  any legitimate candidate for public office. But Christian nationalists and such nefarious organizations as the New Apostolic Reformation promote their candidates and their agenda with the intent of co-opting civil government essentially as an arm of the church (or their version of the church), and I oppose that strongly.

 

 

But yoou miss the point

As far as I am concerned,anyone of any religious persuasion can legally support  any legitimate candidate for public office. But Christian nationalists and such nefarious organizations as the New Apostolic Reformation promote their candidates and their agenda with the intent of co-opting civil government essentially as an arm of the church (or their version of the church), and I oppose that strongly.

------------------------------------------------

Why do you oppose that strongly but not the muslim's and other's attempt at taking over? On one hand you claim you don't want to exclude anyone, on the other you make it clear you want to exclude them. The left makes it clear they don't think Republicans should have a voice in the way this country is run. Muslim or Christian? Well, pretty clear to me which one we'd be better off with.

Last edited by Bestworking

As far as I am concerned,anyone of any religious persuasion can legally support  any legitimate candidate for public office. But Christian nationalists and such nefarious organizations as the New Apostolic Reformation promote their candidates and their agenda with the intent of co-opting civil government essentially as an arm of the church (or their version of the church), and I oppose that strongly.

------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Why do you oppose that strongly but not the muslim's and other's attempt at taking over? On one hand you claim you don't want to exclude anyone, on the other you make it clear you want to exclude them. The left makes it clear they don't think Republicans should have a voice in the way this country is run. Muslim or Christian? Well, pretty clear to me which one we'd be better off with.

______

The post above that you quoted, who posted that?

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

As far as I am concerned,anyone of any religious persuasion can legally support  any legitimate candidate for public office. But Christian nationalists and such nefarious organizations as the New Apostolic Reformation promote their candidates and their agenda with the intent of co-opting civil government essentially as an arm of the church (or their version of the church), and I oppose that strongly.

------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Why do you oppose that strongly but not the muslim's and other's attempt at taking over? On one hand you claim you don't want to exclude anyone, on the other you make it clear you want to exclude them. The left makes it clear they don't think Republicans should have a voice in the way this country is run. Muslim or Christian? Well, pretty clear to me which one we'd be better off with.

______

The post above that you quoted, who posted that?

Contendah.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

As far as I am concerned,anyone of any religious persuasion can legally support  any legitimate candidate for public office. But Christian nationalists and such nefarious organizations as the New Apostolic Reformation promote their candidates and their agenda with the intent of co-opting civil government essentially as an arm of the church (or their version of the church), and I oppose that strongly.

------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Why do you oppose that strongly but not the muslim's and other's attempt at taking over? On one hand you claim you don't want to exclude anyone, on the other you make it clear you want to exclude them. The left makes it clear they don't think Republicans should have a voice in the way this country is run. Muslim or Christian? Well, pretty clear to me which one we'd be better off with.

______

The post above that you quoted, who posted that?

Contendah.

___

Pore ole semi.  She blocks me out but then she finds  me quoted without the usual attribution, and is dying--or at least eager--to know the source. If she would stay on the porch with the big dogs, she would not have to rely on someone else for such information.

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

As far as I am concerned,anyone of any religious persuasion can legally support  any legitimate candidate for public office. But Christian nationalists and such nefarious organizations as the New Apostolic Reformation promote their candidates and their agenda with the intent of co-opting civil government essentially as an arm of the church (or their version of the church), and I oppose that strongly.

------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Why do you oppose that strongly but not the muslim's and other's attempt at taking over? On one hand you claim you don't want to exclude anyone, on the other you make it clear you want to exclude them. The left makes it clear they don't think Republicans should have a voice in the way this country is run. Muslim or Christian? Well, pretty clear to me which one we'd be better off with.

______

The post above that you quoted, who posted that?

Contendah.

___

Pore ole semi.  She blocks me out but then she finds  me quoted without the usual attribution, and is dying--or at least eager--to know the source. If she would stay on the porch with the big dogs, she would not have to rely on someone else for such information.

 

+++

 

Semi didn't ask you.

 

Best did.  Answer her.

 

Last edited by budsfarm
Originally Posted by budsfarm:
Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

As far as I am concerned,anyone of any religious persuasion can legally support  any legitimate candidate for public office. But Christian nationalists and such nefarious organizations as the New Apostolic Reformation promote their candidates and their agenda with the intent of co-opting civil government essentially as an arm of the church (or their version of the church), and I oppose that strongly.

------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Why do you oppose that strongly but not the muslim's and other's attempt at taking over? On one hand you claim you don't want to exclude anyone, on the other you make it clear you want to exclude them. The left makes it clear they don't think Republicans should have a voice in the way this country is run. Muslim or Christian? Well, pretty clear to me which one we'd be better off with.

______

The post above that you quoted, who posted that?

Contendah.

___

Pore ole semi.  She blocks me out but then she finds  me quoted without the usual attribution, and is dying--or at least eager--to know the source. If she would stay on the porch with the big dogs, she would not have to rely on someone else for such information.

 

+++

 

Semi didn't ask you.

 

Best did.  Answer her.

 ___

Read the string again.  semi is the one who wanted to know who posted.  Best knew, since my reply was first directed to her.  The matter is confusing, since Best quoted me without attribution. But she had to know who first posted the statement, since it is she who copied it and re-posted it within the text of HER post.

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×