Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Howard Roark:
JJP,

Why are you against vets sharing unused education benefits with their spouses and children?



Howard, My dad who was a WWII vet, received education benefits, the GI loans that built our house. I think our vets of today should be able to enjoy the same benefits. The GI Bill that existed in WWII does not exist today.
Currently dumbest quote on the TD Forum.

I'd suggest these three as just the start of a list of dumb, prejudiced, quotes revealing a character starved for recognition lashing out for attention in any pathetic means possible.

But, again they may just reveal a poverty of intellect.

Student Loans are TAX PAYER funded

Because they are ignorant low level racist but they shouldnt be blamed fully it stems from a mix of upbringing and low caliber intelligence and ignorance in general

Today in science and what we know Reagan would not been classified human but a midsize gorilla with the mind of a garden snake
I have made oblique references to items the RNC and 527s are holding in obeyance until the general election about Obama.

"No Marxist influenced Hussein Obama for this proud American household."

The above statement is refers to my above statement and is pretty much the truth.

Thursday, May 29, 2008
Barack Obama Ran On A MARXIST PARTY Line in 1996

It seems that Senator Obama's Old party was called the New Party. The party was a Marxist Political coalition. This was not a guilt by association thing. Senator Obama sought out their nomination. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers. Read more on the Marxist endorsement that Barack Obama sought out:

Co-founded in 1992 by Daniel Cantor (a former staffer for Jesse Jackson's 1988 presidential campaign) and Joel Rogers (a sociology and law professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison), the New Party was a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials -- most often Democrats. The New Party's short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party.

Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the militant organization ACORN. The party's Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.

The New Party's modus operandi included the political strategy of "electoral fusion," where it would nominate, for various political offices, candidates from other parties (usually Democrats), thereby enabling each of those candidates to occupy more than one ballot line in the voting booth. By so doing, the New Party often was able to influence candidates' platforms. (Fusion of this type is permitted in seven states -- Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Mississippi, New York, South Carolina, and Vermont -- but is common only in New York.)

For more go to:

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2008/05/barack-obama-ran...xist-party-line.html

Obama did not exist in a vacuum before 2008, his record will be exposed as time passes.

It will be interesting to see if Hillary uses it first.
asndrsn80,

Except for fathering the two greatest murder machines in history; destroying the lives of millions more; leaving extremely polluted areas in its wake; and attempting to remake humanity in an anti-human society, nothing, I guess!

You were an adult when communism collapsed in the USSR and the iron curtain countries, weren't you?
quote:
Originally posted by Howard Roark:
I have made oblique references to items the RNC and 527s are holding in obeyance until the general election about Obama.

"No Marxist influenced Hussein Obama for this proud American household."

The above statement is refers to my above statement and is pretty much the truth.

Thursday, May 29, 2008
Barack Obama Ran On A MARXIST PARTY Line in 1996

It seems that Senator Obama's Old party was called the New Party. The party was a Marxist Political coalition. This was not a guilt by association thing. Senator Obama sought out their nomination. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers. Read more on the Marxist endorsement that Barack Obama sought out:

Co-founded in 1992 by Daniel Cantor (a former staffer for Jesse Jackson's 1988 presidential campaign) and Joel Rogers (a sociology and law professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison), the New Party was a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials -- most often Democrats. The New Party's short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party.

Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the militant organization ACORN. The party's Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.

The New Party's modus operandi included the political strategy of "electoral fusion," where it would nominate, for various political offices, candidates from other parties (usually Democrats), thereby enabling each of those candidates to occupy more than one ballot line in the voting booth. By so doing, the New Party often was able to influence candidates' platforms. (Fusion of this type is permitted in seven states -- Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Mississippi, New York, South Carolina, and Vermont -- but is common only in New York.)

For more go to:

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2008/05/barack-obama-ran...xist-party-line.html

Obama did not exist in a vacuum before 2008, his record will be exposed as time passes.

It will be interesting to see if Hillary uses it first.


I should’ve known Howard knew what I was talking about with this statement.
I was under the impression that any ideology taken to its fullest extreme is as dangerous as any other. Leave it up to mankind to screw things up for everyone. After all, misery is the river of the world. I am just tired of seeing labels attached to things for added emphasis that have nothing to do with the referenced information. It's always Marxist this, Liberal that, Right-wing this, Ditto-head that... Our conversation always reverts to name-calling these days. It's quite depressing (or comical), when you really examine it. Just turn your TV onto any major news network. When was the last time you saw anything worthwhile being discussed?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×