Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Excerpt:

"More alarmingly we now rely on foreigners to finance over 40 percent of this debt with the lion's share coming from the Asian central banks. In FY 2006 the current account trade deficit is on track to set yet another record, on the order of $700 billion. To put this in perspective, billionaire investor Warren Buffet points out that, "15 years ago, the U.S. had no trade deficit with China. Now, it's 200 billion dollars." He says if the country does not change course, the rest of the world could end up owning 15 trillion-dollars worth of the United States. That's equal to the value of all American stock."
Big Bubba

I am so deep in debt, I don't have the time to worry about the nation.

________________________________________________
Better think again.

Excerpt:

"A hard landing is one where the foreigners lose confidence in putting their money in this country. The scenario then is that the dollar drops very sharply; interest rates rise very sharply. It has serious effects obviously on the stock market and the economy, and it heads us towards this dreaded stagflation where you have both inflation and recession at the same time."

".....America's standard of living will surely take a tumble. When the dollar takes a fall on the global exchange, as it must eventually, everything Americans buy from abroad will cost more. With America's manufacturing base all but evaporated, virtually every industry sector will start to feel inflationary pressures. Inflation would force the Fed to raise interest rates further which will have effects throughout the entire economy, forcing many businesses large and small to the brink of insolvency and raising unemployment.

.....the high deficits are putting the assets of all Americans at risk through inflation. Inflation is a poorly understood phenemenon, but its effects are both powerful and insidious. As even the modern day father of deficit spending, economist John Maynard Keynes acknowledged, "The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens."

"For further information on how to get involved visit: http://www.time-bomb.org/."
A quick question: How would everyone here solve the national debt problem? If you had the job, what programs would you cut? What measures would you take to lower the debt? And for sake of debate lets assume we are not in a war at the moment. Besides, only saying get out of Iraq is too easy of an answer and is merely a temporary fix.
Larz34:

A quick question: How would everyone here solve the national debt problem? If you had the job, what programs would you cut? What measures would you take to lower the debt? And for sake of debate lets assume we are not in a war at the moment. Besides, only saying get out of Iraq is too easy of an answer and is merely a temporary fix.
________________________________________________

I would cut the Defense Budget by at least half. It's nothing but a huge rip-off of the tax payer with a huge amount of money going to the defense industry, it's CEO's and stock holders for weapons that we don't need or use. You don't need to be able to blow up the world ten times, only one time will do it. They then turn around and give huge campaign contributions to congress that support their agenda.

I would end the Bush tax cuts and put a wealth tax on the top 1%. They have as much wealth as the "Bottom" 90% and should pay a tax on wealth. We are talking about multi millionaires and billionaires. I saw one such plan that began with those who made a million and a half a year paying an additional $15,000 a year and it increases with the income level.

I would also increase the corporate tax.

I would give tax breaks to the average working people and the poor, who need the money and will spend it.
quote:
Originally posted by Pogo142:
Larz34:

A quick question: How would everyone here solve the national debt problem? If you had the job, what programs would you cut? What measures would you take to lower the debt? And for sake of debate lets assume we are not in a war at the moment. Besides, only saying get out of Iraq is too easy of an answer and is merely a temporary fix.
________________________________________________

I would cut the Defense Budget by at least half. It's nothing but a huge rip-off of the tax payer with a huge amount of money going to the defense industry, it's CEO's and stock holders for weapons that we don't need or use. You don't need to be able to blow up the world ten times, only one time will do it. They then turn around and give huge campaign contributions to congress that support their agenda.

I would end the Bush tax cuts and put a wealth tax on the top 1%. They have as much wealth as the "Bottom" 90% and should pay a tax on wealth. We are talking about multi millionaires and billionaires. I saw one such plan that began with those who made a million and a half a year paying an additional $15,000 a year and it increases with the income level.

I would also increase the corporate tax.

I would give tax breaks to the average working people and the poor, who need the money and will spend it.


Did you know that in 2003 (last year for census info) there were 24,416,241 businesses in America and out of those businesses 24,395,764 are categorized as small businesses (500 or fewer employees)? You want to tax the small businesses even more than they are? For a small business (C-Corp) that makes a profit the estimated payable corporate taxes on that profit is 57%. And you want more?

Let’s look at your figures of an extra 15,000 for a person earning 1.5 million a year. I am looking for the exact figure but it is estimated that the person earning that amount would be held within the 48% tax bracket. Meaning they have to pay $720,000.00 in income taxes, not including state taxes. But what is the harm in adding an additional $15K to the tax bill? They can afford it, right.
All I see is that you are looking for a redistribution of the wealth of this nation. Take from the people that have extreme determination and hard working laurels and the ability to build up a company for themselves. I am speaking of the 24,395,764 owners of those businesses you wish to tax more of, the people that fought with blood, sweat, and tears to build their company.

I know there are large corporations out there, mostly the remaining 20,477 business in America that does work solely for the corporation’s profits, agenda, and shareholders. But you must also understand that in our free economic market that is what those corporations are supposed to do. What we are going to see in the very near future is this number of large corporations dwindling drastically in America and the fall of the economy in this country. And when this happens there will be no unions to help you, because in the end if there are no large corporate employers there can be no unions. The country will become a nation of service industries.
I forget the exact figures but without looking them up corporations paid much more then they do now and the economy worked fine, for everyone. They were cut by Reagan and as I remember the first year taxes were cut the Treasury was something like $50 billion short and it continued ever since. Clinton raised taxes on the wealthy slightly, only by a couple of percentage points, and along with some ill advised cuts that caused a lot of suffering was able to have a surplus.

The plan I refereed to was present by Robert Borosage, a progressive economist, where in about 10 years think it was, without cuts to those in need, the US would be able to wipe out the debt. We are talking about taxing the 1% who's wealth equals that of the "bottom" 90%. They are not paying back into the system for that 90%. Every tine increasing taxes on multi millionaires and billionaires is proposed right away images of the middle class being wiped out by taxes is thrown up as a scare tactic. The middle class is being wiped out now because our incomes are not rising and the very wealthy are not paying their fair share of taxes.

The American worker has also been busting his bottom but his wages are not going up, but profits for the wealthy are. Unions level the playing field. It's up to the government to tax the profits and reinvest in the country. There is a good quote by Lincoln about the govenrments role in paving the way for the workers to succeed.

America is facing a crises and it has to do with the large income gap, the selling out of our jobs and industry for increases in profits and massive debt. It will collapse. They have been blaming workers and unions for twenty-five years but it's not the problem.

Corporations are multi national and move capital around the world and these problems need to he faced on a global scale.
quote:
Originally posted by Pogo142:
I forget the exact figures but without looking them up corporations paid much more then they do now and the economy worked fine, for everyone. They were cut by Reagan and as I remember the first year taxes were cut the Treasury was something like $50 billion short and it continued ever since. Clinton raised taxes on the wealthy slightly, only by a couple of percentage points, and along with some ill advised cuts that caused a lot of suffering was able to have a surplus.

The plan I refereed to was present by Robert Borosage, a progressive economist, where in about 10 years think it was, without cuts to those in need, the US would be able to wipe out the debt. We are talking about taxing the 1% who's wealth equals that of the "bottom" 90%. They are not paying back into the system for that 90%. Every tine increasing taxes on multi millionaires and billionaires is proposed right away images of the middle class being wiped out by taxes is thrown up as a scare tactic. The middle class is being wiped out now because our incomes are not rising and the very wealthy are not paying their fair share of taxes.

The American worker has also been busting his bottom but his wages are not going up, but profits for the wealthy are. Unions level the playing field. It's up to the government to tax the profits and reinvest in the country. There is a good quote by Lincoln about the govenrments role in paving the way for the workers to succeed.

America is facing a crises and it has to do with the large income gap, the selling out of our jobs and industry for increases in profits and massive debt. It will collapse. They have been blaming workers and unions for twenty-five years but it's not the problem.

Corporations are multi national and move capital around the world and these problems need to he faced on a global scale.



Very Good Well Said!!
quote:
Originally posted by pba:
Thanks to Bushy and his republican rubber stamp congress your kids and grandkids will be paying on this debt for a long time indeed.
And, thanks to Bush and company, the Clinton plan for resolving the Social Security Crisis went down the tubes. This quote is from his final State of the Union Address in 2000.
quote:
Beyond paying off the debt, we must ensure that the benefits of debt reduction go to preserving two of the most important guarantees we make to every American -- Social Security and Medicare. (Applause.) Tonight, I ask you to work with me to make a bipartisan down payment on Social Security reform by crediting the interest savings from debt reduction to the Social Security Trust Fund so that it will be strong and sound for the next 50 years.
Had the tax and spend policies that brought us the budget surplus been carried on, we would not be debating the future of Social Security and Medicaid and we might even be talking of other programs to aid impoverished Americans.
Ummmmmm, that just MAY be because the over 600 BILLION DOLLARS that Bush has sent to Iraq is far more than the mere 20 billion that you are harping about... a drop in the bucket, and that just MIGHT help AMERICA instead of someone else in another country that does not belong to us, and has nothing to do with us, and is none of OUR business...

Oh, and that 600 BILLION is ONLY for the war, that is not even close to what that man has spent on things he did NOT even get Congress or Senate approval for!!! He readily admits that he is going to "do it anyway"... about a LOT of things...

Time to get the Calculators out here people Big Grin
quote:
Originally posted by Southern Patriot:
Your friends on the left a doing a fine job on that deficit too. The first major piece of legislation they are trying to push out has 20 BILLION + in pork spending. You keep beating up on GWB, but as the Dem's say "congress controls the purse".
I want to ask a question of you. Where is that 20 billion in pork going to be spent?
It gets spent on improvements to infrastructure, in Congressional districts all over the US. There are 435 of them, and each one has potential projects that benefit the whole of the nation. Public spending is a large part of the prosperity of this nation. When a "Bridge to Nowhere" gets built, hundreds of workers are paid salaries to build it. Material is purchased, and nowhere becomes somewhere to go on a Sunny Summer Afternoon.
If you are referring to the Iraq Funding Bill, the passage of the bill was dependent on votes, some of those votes literally purchased by giving the constituents of the Representative voting a perk. The Representative himself benefits little, but the people he represents benefit a lot.
You should look further than the edge of your own property for the causes of your own prosperity.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×