Skip to main content

This Recession, It's Just Beginning

By Steven Pearlstein
Friday, June 27, 2008; D01



So much for that second-half rebound.

Truth be told, that was always more of a wish than a serious forecast, happy talk from the Fed and Wall Street desperate to get things back to normal.

It ain't gonna happen. Not this summer. Not this fall. Not even next winter.

This thing's going down, fast and hard. Corporate bankruptcies, bond defaults, bank failures, hedge fund meltdowns and 6 percent unemployment. We're caught in one of those vicious, downward spirals that, once it gets going, is very hard to pull out of.

Only this will be a different kind of recession -- a recession with an overlay of inflation. That combo puts the Federal Reserve in a Catch-22 -- whatever it does to solve one problem only makes the other worse. Emerging from a two-day meeting this week, Fed officials signaled that further recession-fighting rate cuts are unlikely and that their next move will be to raise rates to contain inflationary expectations.

Since last June, we've seen a fairly consistent pattern to the economic mood swings. Every three months or so, there's a round of bad news about housing, followed by warnings of more bank write-offs and then a string of disappointing corporate earnings reports. Eventually, things stabilize and there are hints that the worst may be behind us. Stocks regain some of their lost ground, bonds fall and then -- bam -- the whole cycle starts again.

It was only in November that the Dow had recovered from the panicked summer sell-off and hit a record, just above 14,000. By March, it had fallen below 12,000. By May, it climbed above 13,000. Now it's heading for a new floor at 11,000. Officially, that's bear market territory. We'll be lucky if that's the floor.

In explaining why that second-half rebound never occurred, the Fed and the Treasury and the Wall Street machers will say that nobody could have foreseen $140 a barrel oil. As excuses go, blaming it on an oil shock is a hardy perennial. That's what Jimmy Carter and Fed Chairman Arthur Burns did in the late '70s, and what George H.W. Bush and Alan Greenspan did in the early '90s. Don't believe it.

Truth is, there are always price or supply shocks of one sort or another. The real problem is that the underlying fundamentals had gotten badly out of whack, making the economy susceptible to a shock. The only way to make things better is to get those fundamentals back in balance. In this case, that means bringing what we consume in line with what we produce, letting the dollar fall to its natural level, wringing the excess capacity out of industries that overexpanded during the credit bubble and allowing real estate prices to fall in line with incomes.

The last hope for a second-half rebound began to fade earlier this month when Lehman Brothers reported that it wasn't as immune to the credit-market downturn as it had led everyone to believe. Lehman scrambled to restore confidence by firing two top executives and raising billions in additional capital, but even that wasn't enough to quiet speculation that it could be the next Bear Stearns.

Since then, there has been a steady drumbeat of worrisome news from nearly every sector of the economy.

American Express and Discover warn that customers are falling further behind on their debts. UPS and Federal Express report a noticeable slowdown in shipments, while fuel costs are soaring. According to the Case-Shiller index, home prices in the top 20 markets fell 15 percent in April from the year before, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac report that mortgage delinquency rates doubled over the same period -- and that's for conventional home loans, not subprime. United Airlines accelerates the race to cut costs and capacity by laying off 950 pilots -- 15 percent of its total -- as a number of airlines retire planes and hint that they may delay delivery or cancel orders of new jets from Boeing and Airbus. Goldman Sachs, which has already had to withdraw its rosy forecast for stocks, now admits it was also too optimistic about junk bond defaults, and analysts warn that Citigroup and Merrill Lynch will also be forced to take additional big write-downs on their mortgage portfolios.

Meanwhile, General Motors, already reeling from a 28 percent plunge in the pace of auto and truck sales, now confronts the fact that it won't get any help this time from GMAC, its once highly profitable finance arm, which is reeling from an increase in delinquencies on home and auto loans. With the carmaker hemorrhaging cash, whispers of a possible default sent the price of insuring GM bonds soaring on the credit default market.

You know things are bad when middle-class Americans have to give up their boats and Brunswick, the nation's biggest maker of powerboats, is forced to close 10 plants and lay off 2,700 workers.

For much of the year, optimists took comfort in the continuing strength of the technology sector and exports to fast-growing countries around the world. But even those bright spots have dimmed.

Tech stocks got hammered yesterday after software maker Oracle and BlackBerry maker Research in Motion warned that the pace of corporate orders had slowed.

And both India and China raised interest rates and bank reserves sharply in an effort to tame inflation and slow their overheated economies, even as the air continued to rush out of their real estate and stock market bubbles.

Like the rain-swollen waters of the Mississippi River, this sudden surge of downbeat news has now overflowed the banks of economic policy and broken through the levees of consumer and investor confidence. At this point, there's not much to do but flee to safety, rescue those in trouble and let nature take its course. And don't let anyone fool you: It will be a while before things return to normal.

Steven Pearlstein can be reached at pearlsteins@washpost.com.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...008062604030_pf.html
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

At least 20 percent of Americans are on top of the economic ladder. Some 60 million people are not suffering because of high gasoline prices, are driving around in expensive $40,000+ cars, are living in sumptuous McMansions and vacation homes, have good health insurance, and are shopping in expensive stores and eating in luxurious restaurants that continue to do gangbuster business.

Meanwhile, the remaining 240 million Americans are suffering in a multitude of ways: millions lack health insurance and care, millions lack adequate food and shelter, millions more face economic insecurity and pain as they cope with extremely expensive gas and mounting food prices even as they increasingly recognize that enjoyable retirement is a disappearing dream and possible job loss puts them one step away from personal bankruptcy. With rising economic inequality, the vast majority of Americans are hurting, which explains why 84 percent say the country is on the wrong track.
The Energy and Commerce subcommittee heard from Gheit (Oppenhimer), Diwan (PFC Consulting), and Michael Masters (Masters Management). All agreed that a lack of regulation of Commodity Futures was the cause of higher gas prices. Masters presented four points that all the analyst/experts agreed would reduce gas prices in 30 to 60 days. The US congress has to pass legislation on position limits and regulation commodities apart from all other indexes. Michael Masters plan will make a difference if Congress will act. They only act if we vote.
All I hear these days is how many people in this country don't have health care. Some one PLEASE tell me where it is written that just because some one is born that they should have health care paid for by the Government. While we are at it, why don't we march and complain because they don't have a new car or a giant screen plasma t.v. and a 3 bedroom house on the lake to live in. Personally I don't have health insurance and I don't want to pay for yours or anyone else's. I am tired of paying for some one else's subsidized housing, food stamps, green cards, and all the rest. Oh by the way, I am retired and I NEVER earned over $35,000 a year in all my work experience, BUT I did save where I could and I pay my own bills without demanding that some one else bail me out of any financial problems that I may have found myself. I do own two houses (one in Florida and one in Russellville, Alabama. And both were paid for BY ME and ME ALONE. If people would quit listening to the bleeding hearts in this country and work for a living as I and many others have, they may not have to rely on Government hand outs and the tax payers could have more of their own money to spend for things they want instead of things that some one else wants.
Idamann is behind the times. The Government does not want you to work. The government wants you to be on the dole.

How else can you explain a national policy that penalizes those who work and rewards those who don't work?

I look forward to the day when everyone is receiving government benefits and no one is paying into the system, when I am in line to apply for government benefits but I cannot apply because the guy who normally processes the applications is in line behind me!
Well idamann, congratulations on your arrogant victory. Just like you, I have worked for my living. Until becoming a wife and mother, I not only attneded college full time, but worked a full time job.
My husband works sometimes 60 hours a week or more. We have a 2 year old child to which I am a full time mother, and I am also a part time student. If any one I know works for their living, it is MY family. We pay our bills like everyone else and about $100 a week of my husband's check goes to PAY for our insurance. We own our home and by the age of 21, we had both paid off our vehicles.
So don't go throwing your weight around. We work hard for our money and with the price of insurance, gas, and FOOD being so high we hardly get by!
All necessary commodities are going sky high, there is nothing left to save! We don't have a new car, a 3 bedroom house on the lake, or a big screen hi-def TV. We pay our bills and can barely afford to feed our family b/c there is no regulation on pricing in this country.
I hope that you don't honestly believe this country's enormous deficit is simply a product of young peoples laziness. Because that is simply not the case. I'm quite sure that our problems have been stirring a long time. It certainly would be nice to be able to live a life of luxury making under $35,000 a year but in this day in age, it is not practical. The rate of pay is too low and the cost of living is too high. I don't rely on the government for handouts to get by and I am not ignorant enough to believe that this is the cause of the issue at hand.
not all folks choose to be poor. i am i work my husband is cripple. we make it weeek to week. we have worked for every thing we have. i bet its not as nice as yours. and u should be proud of yourself. but lets get real. work is falling off . theres no where to turn but to the gov. for help. they put us in this shape so let them help us. they help everone else.would u like to go to bed hungery? well the person who lives down the road from u might be.u may get your bills payed , u may get your meds, but after that do u get milk? or bread? dont down folks that cant help it . they feel bad enough.
You who are coming against me are in fact proving my point. We do have too many give away programs in this country which are causing most us to do without the things we need. I also worked two FULL TIME JOBS for over 22 years to achieve the things and acquire the things I want and/or need. I laud you for what you are doing. BUT you missed my point entirely. Look at your check stub now and mark down how much in taxes you are paying now and visit that check stub in about two years if Obama is elected. You will see less and less take home pay because the Socialists who have been running (perhaps I should say ruining) this country raise your tax burden to pay for all of their programs. They are totally sold out on the fact that those who are earning a living should have as much of their money as possible CONFISCATED to pay the way for those who do not earn a paycheck. Subsidized housing has to be torn down and rebuilt every 5 years on average because of total destruction by the inhabitants. They can (and do) sit at home and wait for their next check to come in from the government. I started my working career in Sheffield Alabama working for the 7-up bottling company for 50 cents per hour when I was only 13 years old. During the summer I put $83 dollars in a savings account. I bought my school clothes for the next school year plus helped to pay for some of the clothes for my sister. I helped to buy coal so that we didn't freeze that winter. I say all of this to say I don't mind helping some one out who is in need. I JUST DON'T WANT TO FORCED TO DO SO.
JJ, what is your solution? The top 1% of earners pay 35% of the taxes, the top 5% pay 50%, and the top 50% pay 96% of the taxes. Should they pay more? The EGTRA of 02 benefitted taxpayers of all levels, not just the rich. A family of 4 making $40k had their tax bill reduced from $1400 to $0.

If liberals want to pay more in taxes then they should send in more money to the IRS. John Edwards set up an S corp in the 90's so he could pay himself in dividends, which are exempt from medicare taxes. John Kerry and his wife reported income of $5m the year he ran fpr prez but paid an effective tax rate of 12% due to sheltering money in trusts and receiving income from tax exempt muni bonds. Kinda funny that these so called "champions of the working man" go to great lengths to avoid paying taxes.
quote:
Originally posted by bama in chi-town:
JJ, what is your solution? The top 1% of earners pay 35% of the taxes, the top 5% pay 50%, and the top 50% pay 96% of the taxes. Should they pay more? The EGTRA of 02 benefitted taxpayers of all levels, not just the rich. A family of 4 making $40k had their tax bill reduced from $1400 to $0.

If liberals want to pay more in taxes then they should send in more money to the IRS. John Edwards set up an S corp in the 90's so he could pay himself in dividends, which are exempt from medicare taxes. John Kerry and his wife reported income of $5m the year he ran fpr prez but paid an effective tax rate of 12% due to sheltering money in trusts and receiving income from tax exempt muni bonds. Kinda funny that these so called "champions of the working man" go to great lengths to avoid paying taxes.


Some of this don't make any sense at all.... my brain dont believe those numbers.... with that rate,,,, then how can our Country be in so much trouble?......
What rate are you referring to?

To answer your question simply, Our country is in the shape it is in because we spend more than we make. One area where this admin has disappointed is that they have not curbed spending. Also we went 52 straight months without an increase in the unemployment rate which has never happened before. This economy has been like a car "in the red" for the last few years. It had to slow at some point and time.
This is a small example of what your right wing republican conservative's have accomplish.

1.This Recession

2. Oil prices fluctuate after passing $143 a barrel.

3. War with Iraq and trying to get one started with Iran.
4. Remember anytime there is war the rich get richer and put the hurt on the poor and middle class. Read your histroy.
5.Food and everything will jump in price because of high gas prices.
6. Others claim that now is the time for coordinated central bank intervention to reverse the dollar’s decline. Those who place their faith in such a plan, overlook the fact that Asian and Middle East central banks have been unsuccessfully intervening on the dollar’s behalf for years.

7.American authorities will be able to obtain greater access to private information such as credit card transactions, internet browsing habits and travel histories of people in Britain under a deal being finalised by European Union officials. This is big government,but I guess you have nothing to hide.

8.The War And Occupation Of Iraq Costs
$532,731,478,754
and growing.

Bush lie about the war, but this is cool with most of you.

You go to church on Sunday and pray for our troops but on Monday you call your congressman and senators and ask them to vote against Senator Webb's GI bill to be reinstated for our troops. If you truly support the troops, you have to support them not only in war but when they come home too. The Bush administration and past republicans have stripped Medicare, Social Security, and Veteran's benefits. The republicans have caused a huge deficit each time they have been in office so they will have an excuse to dip into the Social Security funds and to cut out these programs that you call social programs. One thing you might want to consider is cutting out corporate welfare. All these corporations that your tax dollars have bailed out to keep them from going bankrupt. I would get educated on corporate welfare because you really show your ignorance when you want to cut out somebody's Medicare and Social Security funds to support corporate welfare for big corporations.

I really think the good ole country boys would absolutely starve before they would vote democrat. But this is how they were raised. They get their ignorance from their parents, who got their ignorance from their parents. They just sort of pass the buck. Any idiot with common sense, especially if he fits into the poor or middle class bracket, would be a fool to cut his own throat and vote republican. But if you are born in the south, your thinking goes back to your ancestors.


This is why you have had republican control for so long.


Robertson's goal is to make the Christian Coalition bigger and more superior than any political group on the right or the left. "I believe that the Christian Coalition," said Robertson, "will be the most powerful political force in America by the end of this decade."

Anyone opposing the Christian Coalition's agenda is accused of "religious bigotry." This is a constant theme, both on Robertson's "700 Club" TV program, and in articles in the Christian Coalition's full-color tabloid newspaper, the Christian American. Folks this is not good to be brainwashed by the Christian Coalition. You can be a good true Christian without a Coalition that preaches propaganda. Wake up and really be the true christian. Real Christians do not hate OR USE GOD TO PUSH THEIR AGENDA or to get votes. Think about that for a bit.
Last edited by JJPAUL
No Idamann, I have no problem paying my taxes. If I ever come into hardship like many people have and many more will, I want the same security.
It's just like paying for insurance, you may never use it but then again you may have something come out of the blue and knock you on your butt. If that were to happen I would feel NO SHAME in taking a piece of what I worked for years to pay. I also don't see anything wrong with paying more taxes if you make more money. The way I see it, if you want this country to do it's job and respect your rights and protect your rights. Then the least you can do is contribute your part.

**IF John McCain is elected what do you think will happen? When asked about his plans for the failing economy and the current recession, he said " I don't know much about the economy". I'm sorry, but if this country elects him there is something wrong! No one cares what is best for this country. If we are to vote, we should vote for the man or woman with the best strategy and best experience to do the job. Not vote for someone because the had the misfortune of being a POW.
quote:
Originally posted by musicalmomma:
Well idamann, congratulations on your arrogant victory. Just like you, I have worked for my living. Until becoming a wife and mother, I not only attneded college full time, but worked a full time job.
My husband works sometimes 60 hours a week or more. We have a 2 year old child to which I am a full time mother, and I am also a part time student. If any one I know works for their living, it is MY family. We pay our bills like everyone else and about $100 a week of my husband's check goes to PAY for our insurance. We own our home and by the age of 21, we had both paid off our vehicles.
So don't go throwing your weight around. We work hard for our money and with the price of insurance, gas, and FOOD being so high we hardly get by!
All necessary commodities are going sky high, there is nothing left to save! We don't have a new car, a 3 bedroom house on the lake, or a big screen hi-def TV. We pay our bills and can barely afford to feed our family b/c there is no regulation on pricing in this country.
I hope that you don't honestly believe this country's enormous deficit is simply a product of young peoples laziness. Because that is simply not the case. I'm quite sure that our problems have been stirring a long time. It certainly would be nice to be able to live a life of luxury making under $35,000 a year but in this day in age, it is not practical. The rate of pay is too low and the cost of living is too high. I don't rely on the government for handouts to get by and I am not ignorant enough to believe that this is the cause of the issue at hand.


Very good post ! Where have YOU been? only 3 post so far !

Idamann says he is retired but has no insurance. Well, I would predict that at some time he WILL have insurance through Medicare . Interesting to know if he will elect to turn it down.

Unfortunately though, there are a lot of people around, including on this forum, that DO believe that the problems that "our countries enormous deficit is simply a product of young peoples laziness". (maybe , however not necessarily young people, but those who are not fortunate enough to make the $200,000 per year necessary to benefit from Republican programs.)
Evidentially, health insurance is very affordable for the single and under 30 crowd. My daughter just got good coverage for $53 per month. She lives in a high cost area and is making it just fine without having to ask me for any money. She is just out of school and has never made more than $10/hour either.

It's unfortunate that most young people put more importance on their cell phone bill than something that could save them (or their families) from financial ruin.
quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Hooberbloob:
Evidentially, health insurance is very affordable for the single and under 30 crowd. My daughter just got good coverage for $53 per month. She lives in a high cost area and is making it just fine without having to ask me for any money. She is just out of school and has never made more than $10/hour either.

It's unfortunate that most young people put more importance on their cell phone bill than something that could save them (or their families) from financial ruin.


My daughter has BC/BS and pays about $160 / month. She has had that insurance for several years and it has gone up from a little less than $100 / month, but luckily, she has seldom used it.
quote:
Originally posted by excelman:
quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Hooberbloob:
Evidentially, health insurance is very affordable for the single and under 30 crowd. My daughter just got good coverage for $53 per month. She lives in a high cost area and is making it just fine without having to ask me for any money. She is just out of school and has never made more than $10/hour either.

It's unfortunate that most young people put more importance on their cell phone bill than something that could save them (or their families) from financial ruin.


My daughter has BC/BS and pays about $160 / month. She has had that insurance for several years and it has gone up from a little less than $100 / month, but luckily, she has seldom used it.


If she's not using it much you may want to suggest she drop down to a higher deductible. I believe my daughter's plan has a $4000 deductible for the $53 price. She could take the extra money and stash it for a rainy day instead of forking it over to BC/BS to never be seen again.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×