Skip to main content

Am I the only one or is there anybody else out there that finds it odd that the Times Daily did not think that yesterday's vote on Capital Hill was worthy of front page coverage? The Times Daily must be the only paper in the country that did not have this on the front page. This wasn't news? This has the entire country up in arms as nothing in my lifetime and this paper thought gardening was the lead story?

SAVED BY GRACE

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Shoals Resident:
Am I the only one or is there anybody else out there that finds it odd that the Times Daily did not think that yesterday's vote on Capital Hill was worthy of front page coverage? The Times Daily must be the only paper in the country that did not have this on the front page. This wasn't news? This has the entire country up in arms as nothing in my lifetime and this paper thought gardening was the lead story?

In case you haven't noticed, issues like healthcare and Roger Bedford are taboo stories for them to put in print. Bedford gets exposed by every other publication in the state and elsewhere for corruption, being the pockets and on the leashes of hundreds of special interests while the TimesDaily shows a picture of him stocking fish in a pond.
quote:
Originally posted by kperk014:
quote:
Originally posted by CeilingCat:
Um... it was the lead on today's front page...


Oh it just started today? I'm so sorry. Roll Eyes


The original post says "Am I the only one or is there anybody else out there that finds it odd that the Times Daily did not think that yesterday's vote on Capital Hill was worthy of front page coverage? The Times Daily must be the only paper in the country that did not have this on the front page."

I was referring to that. It was on the front page the day after the vote, just like every other paper in the country.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×