Skip to main content

Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds

 
 

A new interim report from the House Oversight committee details Trump administration officials efforts to transfer nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, pictured here, visited the U.S. in March 2017 to discuss U.S. investments in energy and infrastructure projects.

Andrew Cabellero-Reynolds/AP

The Trump administration sought to rush the transfer of American nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia in potential violation of the law, a new report from the House Oversight and Reform Committee alleges.

Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings's staff issued an "interim staff" report Tuesday, citing "multiple whistleblowers" who raised ethical and legal concerns about the process.

"They have warned about political appointees ignoring directives from top ethics advisers at the White House who repeatedly and unsuccessfully ordered senior Trump administration officials to halt their efforts," the report states. "They have also warned of conflicts of interest among top White House advisers that could implicate federal criminal statutes."

The committee's report alleges that the major drivers behind the effort to transfer of U.S. nuclear technology were retired Gen. Michael Flynn, who served as the president's national security adviser, and Thomas Barrack, who chaired the Trump inaugural committee. Flynn was fired in February 2017 for lying about conversations with the Russian Ambassador to Vice President Pence and the F.B.I.

For roughly seven months in 2016, including during the presidential transition, Flynn served as an adviser to IP3 International, a private company seeking to build nuclear plants in Saudi Arabia.

 

The whistleblowers told the committee that Flynn continued to advocate for IP3's plan even after he joined the White House as the president's National Security Advisor in 2017.

The Atomic Energy Act requires that Congress approve any transfer of nuclear technology to a foreign country. The committee's report states that a senior director at the National Security Council (NSC), Derek Harvey, "reportedly ignored... warnings and insisted that the decision to transfer nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia had already been made."

The NSC's lawyers realized that Flynn had a possible conflict of interest that could violate the law, the whistleblowers said, and told NSC staff to stop working on the nuclear technology transfer plan. Despite Flynn's firing in February 2017, the plan appeared to continue to progress with Barrack's support.

The committee announced intends to launch an investigation into this matter "to determine whether the actions being pursued by the Trump administration are in the national security interests of the United States, or, rather, serve those who stand to gain financially as a result of this potential change in U.S. foreign policy."

Shortly after the release of the report, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., announced that his panel would be coordinating with Cummings' to explore these allegations.

Tuesday's disclosure of a plan to sell nuclear technology comes as the United States considers its relationship with the Saudi government in the wake of the killing of writer Jamal Khashoggi.

Following his death, the House and Senate have both passed resolutions to limit U.S. involvement in the Saudi-led coalition fighting in the Yemeni civil war. The Senate also passed a resolution by voice vote — reflecting unanimity — that was fashioned to "hold Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman responsible for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi."

The report also comes as President Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner is scheduled to travel next week for a trip to the Middle East which includes a stop in Riyadh, the Saudi capital.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment on the Oversight committee's report.

Original Post

I'm not for the nuclearization (if that's a word) of the Middle East no matter what nation it involves.  Israel already has Nukes and there is no doubt the Saudis want to Nuke up to oppose Iran's supposed Nuclear interest.  At least Trump hasn't off loaded a plane load of money at a Saudi airport like Obama gave to Iran for the release of some hostages (well they didn't say it was for that but you can bet it was) and it was a huge amount of money that no doubt can and will be used for nefarious causes (terrorism or Nuclear ambitions).  

I think  both Obama and Trump shouldn't get involved in allowing any of these additional states (or even North Korea) to get Nukes.  Thing is though that the genie is out of the bottle and Iran is going to have a Nuke eventually so it's expected that the Saudi's, who Iran has already indirectly attacked with missiles, via Yemen, would want to achieve their own Nuclear status, if for nothing else, as a deterrent against Iran.  I don't think helping any Arab nation gain Nukes when they could eventually be used against Israel is in our direct interest but I also believe that Trump is doing no worse than Obama has already done.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×