Skip to main content

 

Whoah!  Where's the AFL-CIO outrage???

 

20,000 jobs, +/- ?

 

Didn't the unions support the pipeline? Why can we hear crickets chirping  now that the President has turned against a proposal they backed? 


Could it be a sweeter deal has been made?


Could it be that a private deal was made last week: The unions would downgrade their disappointment at the veto of Keystone XL, in return for the president unconstitutionally using his powers to override the Constitution and put in pro-labor recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the same  board that tried to penalize Boeing for wanting to move its new facility to South Carolina from the state of Washington.


For the unions, a pro-left-wing NLRB is more important for Big Labor to attain all of its goals even if it hurts the spread of corporations to a more hospitable climate where new jobs would be created. This kind of clout as well as promises to support other labor demands that  Congress might not sanction but which the president would try to implement by executive fiat are more important in their judgment than having the pipeline built at this moment



So the president makes his move, and leaves the pipeline for the future while instead he makes his stand in an orchestrated speech to be given at Disney World’s “Main Street,” as far away as possible from any real American main street ?


Hmmm...where's the REAL face of Big Labor? Makes one think.

 

 

http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2...stone-xl-pipeline/2/

 

 

 

 

 

 



Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Roland Pfalz:

 

Whoah!  Where's the AFL-CIO outrage???

 

20,000 jobs, +/- ?

 

Didn't the unions support the pipeline? Why can we hear crickets chirping  now that the President has turned against a proposal they backed? 


Could it be a sweeter deal has been made?


Hmmm...where's the REAL face of Big Labor? Makes one think.

 

 

http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2...stone-xl-pipeline/2/

 

 

 

 

20,000 jobs, +/- ?  Really?


Fox Anchor Pushes Claim That Keystone XL Pipeline Would Create 20,000 Jobs

Fox Anchor Martha MacCallum: 20,000 Jobs Is "The Low-End Estimate."


But That Figure Is Wildly Inflated

TransCanada Said In 2010 That Keystone XL Pipeline "Is Expected To Create Over ... 13,000 New Jobs For American Workers."


Wash. Post: Based On TransCanada's Numbers, "The Number Of People Employed" Would Actually Be 6,500.


State Department: "The Construction Work Force Would Consist Of Approximately 5,000 To 6,000 Workers." 


Cornell University Global Labor Institute: Based On TransCanada's Numbers, "The Project Will Create No More Than 2,500-4,600 Temporary Direct Construction Jobs." 


Cornell University Global Labor Institute: "Based On The Figures Provided By TransCanada For The Canadian Section Of The Pipeline, The New Permanent US Pipeline Jobs In The US Number As Few As 50."


http://mediamatters.org/research/201112080014


 

 

The Obama adminstration uses a factor of 4.5 multiplied against unemployment payments to justify their statement that "unemployment insurance increases employment."

 

Surely a factor of 5 might be used against the direct pipeline jobs to reach even more than 20,000.  Feeding the crews, money they spend in stores, manufacturing supplies for the pipeline., etc.  And, all taxed and adding to the tax revenue instead of drawing against it.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×