Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Nope. I don't live in California.

The deputy was acquitted of all charges. To the best of my knowledge, he has not been charged with any civil rights violations.

The deputy claimed that Carrion made a furtive movement that is not visible in the video.

As the jury commented:

quote:
But jurors accepted the defense's contention that Webb saw Carrion reach toward his jacket -- as if grabbing for a gun -- and sprang to his feet as if lunging to attack the officer, said Day and juror Michael Thompson.

"I think, from Ivory's point of view, that was the straw that broke the camel's back," Day said. "He did everything that a reasonable officer would do in his position.

"You have to look at the totality of what happened, not just that minute-and-a-half video."

Another juror heaped the blame squarely on Carrion and Escobedo.

"If they would have just shut their mouths and did what he said, none of this would have happened," said juror Linda Goldstein. "I couldn't see (Webb) going to prison. If they don't shoot you on the job, they prosecute you? No one would be a deputy."


Big Grin
Sassy, I think you have a groupie....or maybe a cult following of one...or maybe just a cyber stalker, lol.

You know, I just had a scary thought: what if Sassy and Surreal are the same person. Some poor guy with multiple personality conflicts. Eeker
Think about it: have any of us ever seen the two of them together? Hmmmmmm......
quote:
Originally posted by lynnblount:
Sassy, I think you have a groupie....or maybe a cult following of one...or maybe just a cyber stalker, lol.

You know, I just had a scary thought: what if Sassy and Surreal are the same person. Some poor guy with multiple personality conflicts. Eeker
Think about it: have any of us ever seen the two of them together? Hmmmmmm......


NOW THAT HURT Frowner
quote:
Originally posted by lynnblount:

You know, I just had a scary thought: what if Sassy and Surreal are the same person. Some poor guy with multiple personality conflicts. Eeker
Think about it: have any of us ever seen the two of them together? Hmmmmmm......


It is a known fact that SJ has multiple personality conflicts, he is arguing with himself right here on TD on another thread this week. I would put my life on the fact that Sassy is not one of them....

Kirk
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by NashBama:
Surreal, that's not cool. Post the video for what it is, no reason to try and use it to attack a forum member.

Not cool at all.



A thread was made to attack me. A thread was made to attack Nurturing Father. I guess you are 'cool' with that huh?


I haven't seen any threads that were started to attack you personally. Feel free to link them.

Besides, if someone did that, by posting this the way you did, you simply stoop to their level.

You can't control the actions of others, only your own actions. It doesn't matter what anyone else did, posting a video of a cop shooting a man and claiming that it is Sassy Kims is pretty juvenile. While I agree with you on the fact that we need to be cautious around police, starting this tread the way you did wasn't very cool.
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Maynard J. Keenan:
quote:
Originally posted by Just_:
Reported............. Razzer


Are you posting from the pc in your 4th grade classroom? Pathetic childish snitch.


Actually I am posting from YOUR PC in the third grade classroom.

OOHHH! I should post about a cop shooting an unarmed man should I?


If you like. Of course, in this case, a jury of 12 acquitted him of ALL charges. Can you say "furtive movement"? I thought you couldn't Big Grin
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by NashBama:
Surreal, that's not cool. Post the video for what it is, no reason to try and use it to attack a forum member.

Not cool at all.



A thread was made to attack me. A thread was made to attack Nurturing Father. I guess you are 'cool' with that huh?


No thread was posted attacking Nurturing Father. The thread you refer to was posted because the topic (if not the only ones, then some of the very few NF has ever posted in)has went on and on without any new information or status. It was lawguy07's opinion that the topic was "beating a dead horse". More than one posting member concurs.
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by NashBama:
Surreal, that's not cool. Post the video for what it is, no reason to try and use it to attack a forum member.

Not cool at all.



A thread was made to attack me. A thread was made to attack Nurturing Father. I guess you are 'cool' with that huh?


No thread was posted attacking Nurturing Father. The thread you refer to was posted because the topic (if not the only ones, then some of the very few NF has ever posted in)has went on and on without any new information or status. It was lawguy07's opinion that the topic was "beating a dead horse". More than one posting member concurs.


If the threads were not receiving comments they would drop to the bottom and into oblivion. This site is not operated by mob rule. You and your troll gang do not hold any special power here.
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Maynard J. Keenan:
quote:
Originally posted by Just_:
Reported............. Razzer


Are you posting from the pc in your 4th grade classroom? Pathetic childish snitch.


Actually I am posting from YOUR PC in the third grade classroom.

OOHHH! I should post about a cop shooting an unarmed man should I?


If you like. Of course, in this case, a jury of 12 acquitted him of ALL charges. Can you say "furtive movement"? I thought you couldn't Big Grin


A jury of 12 acquitted OJ Simpson too. Did you mean to make a point?
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by NashBama:
Surreal, that's not cool. Post the video for what it is, no reason to try and use it to attack a forum member.

Not cool at all.



A thread was made to attack me. A thread was made to attack Nurturing Father. I guess you are 'cool' with that huh?


No thread was posted attacking Nurturing Father. The thread you refer to was posted because the topic (if not the only ones, then some of the very few NF has ever posted in)has went on and on without any new information or status. It was lawguy07's opinion that the topic was "beating a dead horse". More than one posting member concurs.


If the threads were not receiving comments they would drop to the bottom and into oblivion. This site is not operated by mob rule. You and your troll gang do not hold any special power here.


But several of us are commenting, as is our right to do so, per our agreement with T/D. The site is operated by T/D, and T/D has given us consent to post as we see fit, as long as we don't violate their rules.

Troll gang? Coming from you, that's a hoot!

As for the special powers, I do indeed have special powers. I have the power to cause you to grind your teeth, and curse in futile disagreement!
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Maynard J. Keenan:
quote:
Originally posted by Just_:
Reported............. Razzer


Are you posting from the pc in your 4th grade classroom? Pathetic childish snitch.


Actually I am posting from YOUR PC in the third grade classroom.

OOHHH! I should post about a cop shooting an unarmed man should I?


If you like. Of course, in this case, a jury of 12 acquitted him of ALL charges. Can you say "furtive movement"? I thought you couldn't Big Grin


A jury of 12 acquitted OJ Simpson too. Did you mean to make a point?


As I suspected, you can't say it!
You are all guilty of message board buffenoory and are really making the board hard to read by quoting EIGHT DIFFERENT POSTS just to respond to the last thing said. Doing it like this....

quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Maynard J. Keenan:
quote:
Originally posted by Just_:
Reported............. Razzer


Are you posting from the pc in your 4th grade classroom? Pathetic childish snitch.


Actually I am posting from YOUR PC in the third grade classroom.

OOHHH! I should post about a cop shooting an unarmed man should I?


If you like. Of course, in this case, a jury of 12 acquitted him of ALL charges. Can you say "furtive movement"? I thought you couldn't Big Grin


A jury of 12 acquitted OJ Simpson too. Did you mean to make a point?


is just plain stupid. Why don't you just quote the last thing said. Maybe like this....

quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice: A jury of 12 acquitted OJ Simpson too. Did you mean to make a point?


It's hard for your side of the argument to merit any credibility when you are both posting like a grandmother who just got her first AOL account.
quote:
Originally posted by Maynard J. Keenan:
You are all guilty of message board buffenoory and are really making the board hard to read by quoting EIGHT DIFFERENT POSTS just to respond to the last thing said. Doing it like this....

quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Maynard J. Keenan:
quote:
Originally posted by Just_:
Reported............. Razzer


Are you posting from the pc in your 4th grade classroom? Pathetic childish snitch.


Actually I am posting from YOUR PC in the third grade classroom.

OOHHH! I should post about a cop shooting an unarmed man should I?


If you like. Of course, in this case, a jury of 12 acquitted him of ALL charges. Can you say "furtive movement"? I thought you couldn't Big Grin


A jury of 12 acquitted OJ Simpson too. Did you mean to make a point?


is just plain stupid. Why don't you just quote the last thing said. Maybe like this....

quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice: A jury of 12 acquitted OJ Simpson too. Did you mean to make a point?


It's hard for your side of the argument to merit any credibility when you are both posting like a grandmother who just got her first AOL account.


Sorry Maynard. Will try to conform to your guidelines. Now, if you will, please put the knife back in your pocket!
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Maynard J. Keenan:
You are all guilty of message board buffenoory and are really making the board hard to read by quoting EIGHT DIFFERENT POSTS just to respond to the last thing said. Doing it like this....

quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice:
quote:
Originally posted by Maynard J. Keenan:
quote:
Originally posted by Just_:
Reported............. Razzer


Are you posting from the pc in your 4th grade classroom? Pathetic childish snitch.


Actually I am posting from YOUR PC in the third grade classroom.

OOHHH! I should post about a cop shooting an unarmed man should I?


If you like. Of course, in this case, a jury of 12 acquitted him of ALL charges. Can you say "furtive movement"? I thought you couldn't Big Grin


A jury of 12 acquitted OJ Simpson too. Did you mean to make a point?


is just plain stupid. Why don't you just quote the last thing said. Maybe like this....

quote:
Originally posted by Surreal Justice: A jury of 12 acquitted OJ Simpson too. Did you mean to make a point?


It's hard for your side of the argument to merit any credibility when you are both posting like a grandmother who just got her first AOL account.


Sorry Maynard. Will try to conform to your guidelines. Now, if you will, please put the knife back in your pocket!


Stand back, baby....we don't know how big this post is gonna get!!!

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×