Skip to main content

Note to Terrorists,
I don't know how many coward Islamic terrorists read forums online, particularly the "Times Daily forums", but in the event at least one does, we've got a message for him:

Harry Reid might be a sissy, but he doesn't represent the majority of us.

Yes, Harry Reid might represent a large chunk of so-called Democrat party "leaders" in their zest to surrender to the terrorists, but we're not all like Harry Reid.

Many of us don't see "Republican or Democrat" written on the faces of US soldiers. We simply see heroes eager to fight and win.

Many of us don't see our president simply as the man who defeated Al Gore in 2000. We see a Commander-in-Chief with a job to do in the face of the "take-a-popularity-poll" mob-rule mentality that's so rampant among too many Democrats.

Many of us aren't unhappy with the actual war, but many are unhappy with what they've been HEARING from some in the media about the war. Reality and reporters don't always go hand-in-hand.

So you see, terrorists, you might be sitting in your caves or huts or behind block walls applauding the fact that a US Senator with a microphone is one helluva wuss and that he wants to let you win, but he ain't like many of us. Most of us want to finish this noble and just war and kick your butts.

Mr. Reid, on the other hand, wishes you well and will no doubt be adding you to his Christmas list. Why? What's this all about, you ask?

Here in America, we have free elections where legal and law abiding citizens have the right to vote for president. In the year 2000, back when your home-boy Osama Bin Laden was still thmbing his nose and laughing at Hillary and Bill Clinton, Hillary and Bill's vice-president Al Gore thought he was entitled to take over as "head cheese" and he even had a team of operatives that were prepared to carry out traditional Democrat party voter fraud, but they were stopped. Thank goodness, too.

Ever since then, even while we're over in your pig-pen part of the world hunting you down, Al Gore and his worshippers have been trying their best to carry out their "post-2000-campaign" goal of "deligitimizing" President Bush.

That's why Harry Reid is willing to let you win. That's why Harry Reid is willing to surrender. That's why you saw plastic-faced Nancy Pelosi in your neck of the woods lately. But remember this, Islamo-nut: the US soldiers don't think like Harry Reid. They're not wussies. They don't surrender.

We're NOT all weak-kneed Democrats, and we're NOT finished in Iraq, Afghanistan, or anywhere else in your pig-pen region. Iran is next. And don't look to your new best friend Harry Reid to stop us there, because he's not in charge.

That was just my opinion, anyway!
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming... Wow, What a ride!!"
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

And, your opinon is a bit skewed and biased. Amounts to the same as mine.In case you missed it we had an election last November and the presidents party lost control of the house and senate. If you dont like the results of that election,well, thats just too bad. Sometimes being a leader means admitting you are wrong - bush is wrong and so are you. Thats just my opinion anyway.....
I am assuming that you are referring to the decision to require the US armed forces leave Iraq.

The war on Iraq is not the war on terrorism. It is the war on Iraq.

The war on Iraq is an act of raw aggression, with NO connection to the war on Terrorism. It is not a crusade against Islam, or any part of Islam, it is a War of aggreession and conquest. Harry Reid, and 50 other Senators, and a majority of the House want it stopped. Over 60% of Americans, according to a recent poll, want a timetable for withdrawal.

So, in calling Senator Reid a sissy, you are calling over 6 out of 10 Americans sissies, including me.

Regarding support of the troops, in a real sense, by paying their wages, a large majority favor paying the bill.

Finally, welcome to the board, and, welcome to the world wide war on terror. Saudi Arabia, without killing anyone, arrested 170 terror suspects yesterday. That is how the war on terror will be won.

There is no point in the US motivating more terrorist organizations and actions by making war on Muslims.
Grinda, I welcome you also, but you have been fooled by Bush.
I don't know where you get that the mess in Iraq is about terrorist.
The attact on Iraq was to overthrow Saddam who had promised his oil to non-American oil companies. We sent troops into Iraq in order for American oil companies to be able to exploit all that oil. Do you not get it?? The "war" in Iraq is about stealing their oil. Period. In affect, the United States military is a surrogate army for Exxon, BP, Shell etc.
All this other stuff is just lies from Bush and Cheney. We have visited this subject before, so you can go back and do some study. There are plenty of links to that information.
If you think that doing whats right is being a "sissy" , you need to re-calibrate your thinking.
T
quote:
The war on Iraq is not the war on terrorism. It is the war on Iraq.


Wrong. The Iraqi army was defeated quickly, their government has been changed from a dictatorship to a democracy. What our troops are fighting over there now are bands of insurgents with no governmental ties, or at least none that we know of. So yes, it is a war on terrorism and not a war on Iraq. Please get your facts straight.
quote:
Another "kool-aid" drinker for bush who types and cuts and pastes lots but says little.

Hey! Your imperial leader is not doing well. He lost the House and Senate - not a ringing endorsement.


It's funny how when people aren't able to debate you, the resort to name calling. Good argument there, well thought out.
So where is your argument here? All I am finding is cheerleading for the cheerleader. The FACT that the American people voted overwhelmingly against the bush administrations prosecution of the war in Iraq is not something to dismiss simply because it does not agree with your view. That is just the way things work in a democracy. Elections have consequences. Clearly you dont like the consequences of the last one. Too bad.

P.S. - Name calling is a tradition in American politics. Try not to be so thin skinned. I also suggest you re-read the post that started this thread and note the "name calling" used. Sort of defuses your little retort. Took the wind right out of that self-righteous sail.
quote:
Originally posted by grnidalgrl:
Kool-Aid? Hmmm. . .I for one don't touch the stuff! Give me Iced Tea, or a Strawberry Margarita any day! Wink


Clever girl.........so sophisticated. Its actually a phrase associated with Jim Jones and his followers. It now is used by both parties to mean.....
Kool-Aid drinkers
People so committed to a political cause or candidate that they senselessly ignore facts in conflict with their political viewpoint.

Found this at Jargon Database.com
quote:
So where is your argument here? All I am finding is cheerleading for the cheerleader. The FACT that the American people voted overwhelmingly against the bush administrations prosecution of the war in Iraq is not something to dismiss simply because it does not agree with your view. That is just the way things work in a democracy. Elections have consequences. Clearly you dont like the consequences of the last one. Too bad.

P.S. - Name calling is a tradition in American politics. Try not to be so thin skinned. I also suggest you re-read the post that started this thread and note the "name calling" used. Sort of defuses your little retort. Took the wind right out of that self-righteous sail.


You wish, if anyone has been drinking the proverbial kool-aid, it's you. You simply hate Bush, that's all. No matter what he does, you'll be against it and anyone who disagrees with you, you will claim they support Bush. That simply shows that you are too lazy to develop your own opinions.

For the umpteenth time, I do not support Bush. I do not think he as been a good president and I do not think the war in Iraq has been executed properly. However, I do have the common sense to understand that we are not at war WITH Iraq, we are at war IN Iraq. There is a difference, please try to do some legitimate reading and think on your own for once instead of blindly trying to throw juvenile insults around.
quote:
Originally posted by EdEKit:
I am assuming that you are referring to the decision to require the US armed forces leave Iraq.

The war on Iraq is not the war on terrorism. It is the war on Iraq.

The war on Iraq is an act of raw aggression, with NO connection to the war on Terrorism. It is not a crusade against Islam, or any part of Islam, it is a War of aggreession and conquest. Harry Reid, and 50 other Senators, and a majority of the House want it stopped. Over 60% of Americans, according to a recent poll, want a timetable for withdrawal.

So, in calling Senator Reid a sissy, you are calling over 6 out of 10 Americans sissies, including me.

Regarding support of the troops, in a real sense, by paying their wages, a large majority favor paying the bill.

Finally, welcome to the board, and, welcome to the world wide war on terror. Saudi Arabia, without killing anyone, arrested 170 terror suspects yesterday. That is how the war on terror will be won.

There is no point in the US motivating more terrorist organizations and actions by making war on Muslims.


EXTREMELY GOOD POINT, Ed!!!

And I too welcome any and every new one to the boards... and grnidalgrl... even if we all disagree about stuff, we can still be friends... right Smiler

Personally, I agree more with Ed's comment than yours, because in MY opinion, Bush has let America down, really bad, and I think that even HE knows that now.... Cheney knows it also..

But of course, that was MY opinion, based on some news shows that I watched, believe it or not, on FOX news.. Big Grin
quote:
Originally posted by NashBama:
quote:
The war on Iraq is not the war on terrorism. It is the war on Iraq.


Wrong. The Iraqi army was defeated quickly, their government has been changed from a dictatorship to a democracy. What our troops are fighting over there now are bands of insurgents with no governmental ties, or at least none that we know of. So yes, it is a war on terrorism and not a war on Iraq. Please get your facts straight.



THERE ya go!!! It was a WAR for the FREEDOM of Iraqi's, not for terrorism!!!

Not for the FREEDOM's of Americans, not for terrorism of Al Queda, but for the freedom of Iraq, in which, I might add, that they do NOT want...

I have over 20 military people on my emails that are in Iraq right now, and I know of at least that many who have been there, and not one single one of them says this has to do with ANYTHING that will ever benefit America.....

It is all for nil, no WMD, no terrorists, it is just a country that has their own Culture that we went over there to change, and for now, Iraqians ARE ALLOWING us to change it, because they are afraid of us...

but when we leave, in a year, 10 years, 20 years, 30 years,... when we leave, they WILL go back to the Culture that they KNOW and AGREE on...

They are just playing OUR game for now because we have bigger guns than they do... sad sad sad.
quote:
Originally posted by NashBama:
quote:
So where is your argument here? All I am finding is cheerleading for the cheerleader. The FACT that the American people voted overwhelmingly against the bush administrations prosecution of the war in Iraq is not something to dismiss simply because it does not agree with your view. That is just the way things work in a democracy. Elections have consequences. Clearly you dont like the consequences of the last one. Too bad.

P.S. - Name calling is a tradition in American politics. Try not to be so thin skinned. I also suggest you re-read the post that started this thread and note the "name calling" used. Sort of defuses your little retort. Took the wind right out of that self-righteous sail.


You wish, if anyone has been drinking the proverbial kool-aid, it's you. You simply hate Bush, that's all. No matter what he does, you'll be against it and anyone who disagrees with you, you will claim they support Bush. That simply shows that you are too lazy to develop your own opinions.

For the umpteenth time, I do not support Bush. I do not think he as been a good president and I do not think the war in Iraq has been executed properly. However, I do have the common sense to understand that we are not at war WITH Iraq, we are at war IN Iraq. There is a difference, please try to do some legitimate reading and think on your own for once instead of blindly trying to throw juvenile insults around.
I ought to stay out of this one, it's between NashBama and meanasasnake. I met up with a sidewinder a few weeks ago, and leaving snakes alone is a RULE.

Nash, (fine automobile, had reclining seats, subject of a great deal of blue humor) You don't support Bush. BUT you do support his centerpiece,
quote:
"The war on terror"

So don't get so bent when some snake in the grass mistakes you for a Bush Supporting Ditto Head.

Your Kool Aid metaphor is off the mark. The Kool Aid Drinkers took the plunge to get to the next, more peaceful world. They did it as an act of DEFIANCE, not submission.

Your common Sense argument is fallacy. We are at War With IRAQ. We are at war with Iraq In Iraq because we went there to MAKE WAR WITH IRAQ.

You have swallowed, Hook Line and Sinker, the first big lie of the war. Iraq supports terrorism against the United States. And may provide WMD to terrorists. THAT SIR WAS A LIE. ADMIT YOU WERE DUPED. Stop supporting the truth of it. Bush, and the other war makers don't.

Note to supporters of the war on terror: The United States is Harboring Carrilo. A convicted terrorist who escaped prison with CIA help and is being protected in Florida by the United States of America. HE WAS CONVICTED OF BOMBING AN AIRLINER WITH 73 PEOPLE ABOARD. The plane was returning to Cuba with a delegation of student athletes, and some Cuban government employees. Carrilo admits the bombing, and justifies it by saying that even the student athletes said nice things about Fidel Castro.

Venezuela, the nation that convicted and imprisoned Carrilo has NOT imposed sanctions on the USA. They Could, They could cut off a sizable portion of our fuel supplies. They have not.

NashBama. Wise Up. We are fighting for domination in the middle east oil patch. That is the ONLY reason we're there.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×