Skip to main content

Hi to my Forum Friends,

In response to my initial post which began the discussion "Choose Whom You Will Follow - God Or Secularism/Atheism/World  Religions" -- our non-believing (atheist?) Friend, Loki, tells us, "I hope he doesn't read Luke 19:27.  I would guess he would have to kill us all then.. us non-christians.  But according to him most times, he's apparently the only true christian left in the world.  Hmm.   Yeah..Bill...never mind about that.  Just skip over that verse and we'll all be ok."

No, Loki, my Friend, in a truly conservative Christian theology -- we cannot skip a single word, verse, or passage of the Bible -- the entire Bible.  A true Christian theology MUST be built upon the entire Bible.  And, that is why it is so important that our pastors and church leaders realize that we MUST teach through the Bible, an expositional teaching of the Bible -- starting with Genesis 1:1 and teaching all the way to Revelation 22:21.  This is one thing I admire about Pastor Chuck Smith and all the pastors of Calvary Chapel  -- they teach the Bible expositionally.

Loki, somewhere in one of your atheist books, Dawkins, Hitchens, et al -- you have been told that Luke 19:27 is proof that God and the Bible are evil.  Strange, since you claim to not believe in God.  But, that is another story for another time.

Actually, in both Matthew 25:14-30 and in Luke 19:11-27 Jesus Christ is using a parable to illustrate the same teaching -- the difference between faithful strong followers, weak followers, and the unfaithful world.   If you will refer back to my discussion titled  "Natural Man, Carnal Man, Spiritual Man - Which Are You?" -- you will find these three described in greater detail.

In the NASB, the parable in Matthew 25 is called the Parable of the Talents; while in Luke 19 it is called the Parable of the Pounds (or Minas).  But, the teaching illustrated and taught is the same -- to those given more (faith, blessings, talents, gifts, teachings, etc.), more is expected.   "For whoever has (the spiritual man), to him shall more be given; and whoever does not have (the carnal  man), even what he has shall be taken away from him"  (Mark 4:25).

However, our secular/atheist Friends prefer to focus on the parable in Luke 19, for they found in verse 27:  "But these enemies of  mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slay them in my presence."   Oh, boy, that verse really reaches  into the heart of our atheist Friends, exciting them.   But, what is the real meaning, what is Jesus really teaching in that verse?

First, let me emphasize that a parable is not a true story, as is the story found in Luke 16:19-31 of Lazarus and the rich man.  A parable, which never uses a person's name, was used by Jesus to teach a lesson or a principle, using local customs, conditions, and beliefs as the means of helping people relate to the point He wanted them to understand.

In Luke 19:11-27, Jesus and His disciples are approaching Jerusalem and His disciples are expecting that He is going to establish His earthly kingdom, defeat the Romans and their puppet king in Jerusalem, and become an earthly king, freeing the Israelites from Roman bondage.

In this passage, He tells them a parable of a wealthy nobleman (Himself) who went to his people (Jews) to be their leader.  But, they refused to follow Him, saying, "We have no king but Caesar" (John 19:15).  And this nobleman (Jesus) left great wealth (He died on the cross to give all who will believe eternal life) for His faithful followers to use.   Many received His great gift of the Gospel and used this resource to gain more wealth (souls) for their Master.  This would be the "spiritual" man.  Others, the "carnal" man, accepted His great gift of wealth, but, did not bother sharing it.  And, the "natural" man rejected Him and His great gift.

Then, the nobleman (Jesus) went away with His promise to return (John 14:1-3) -- and, then, as promised, He would reward His faithful stewards, His faithful servants.  More given to the faithful "spiritual" servant who used His gifts wisely and earned Him many new souls.  Less for the "carnal" servant who did little with His great gifts -- and did virtually nothing to grow the kingdom of God.

Then, there is the "natural" man, that person who rejected this nobleman, who declared, "We have no king but Caesar" (John 19:15).  This person is dealt with in the Parable of the Talents, Matthew 25:30, "Throw out the worthless slave into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."  

This is basically the same that is taught in the Parable of the Pounds, Luke 19:27, "But these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slay them in my presence."  That will begin in the Tribulation, which is the time of the "refiner's fire" for the people of Israel (Malachi 3:2) -- and will culminate with the judgment taught in Revelation 20:11-15.

What is the teaching Jesus is explaining in these two parables?  It is that the faithful believers will be rewarded, as we read in Matthew 25:29, "For to everyone who has, more shall be given, and he will have an abundance. . ."    But, those who deny their Savior, as the Jews denied their Messiah -- in their "free will" choice to deny their Savior/Messiah, they have condemned themselves to eternal suffering in hell -- where they will eternally be out of the presence and glory of God.  This is the death Jesus is referring to in Luke 19:27 and in Matthew 25:30, the second death (Revelation 20:14).

Loki, thank you for raising this question.  I am sure that many, even Christians, who have read Luke 19:27 have wondered about its real meaning.   I pray that I have clarified this to your understanding.  If you would like to discuss more Biblical issues, I will be happy to dialogue with you.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:   Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:
Another example of God being such a poor writer that Bill has to explain what he means. It doesn't get any sillier than this.

Hi Jimi,

You have made this very misinformed comment before.  So, let me ask you -- have you ever taken any classes in school -- grade  school, high school, college?  In those classes, did you use text books?   When you began the classes, did you understand  everything written in those text books?  No?   You needed a teacher to help you understand the content of the text books?

Then, does this mean that the writers of those text books were poor writers?  Or, did it mean that YOU needed to have someone  explain the meanings to you?

True, there are many who know more about the Bible than me -- and need no explanation I can give.  Yet, there are some who are  not as mature in their knowledge of God's Word -- and can use my help, or the help of any mature Christian, in understanding.

Just as you were a "babe without knowledge" when you began to take classes -- and needed someone, i.e., the teacher, to explain  the ideas to you -- there are "babes in Christ" who need help from we more mature Christians.

This is no reflection upon God, nor the knowledge He imparts in His Written Word, the Bible.  It is only a true reflection that we  humans do not have all the knowledge of God -- and we need to help one another better understand.

Jimi, instead of trying to be a wise guy, or play the play ground clown -- why don't you do some serious study of God's Word -- and  see what it can do in your life.  If you need help, I will be happy to help you.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill 

quote:   Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

Bill claims to have some gift for writing.  After two readings, I can only say there isn't a college professor in the known world that would give passing marks for this mess.   And I'm wondering how to get the ten minutes back that I wasted on it. 


Hi Crusty,

 

While I realize that you cannot offer anyone a correct explanation of God's Word; so, I will not ask you help there.  However, you indicate that my writing is bad.  Please do me a favor and point out any errors you see in my writing -- any spelling, grammatical, or other errors you see.   I will sincerely appreciate any and all suggestions you can offer which will improve my writing skills.

 

Of course, we will skip over your standard comment -- it's too long!  Sorry, my Friend, I do not write "Jack and Jill" stories for kiddies; I write for adults who are supposed to be able to read more than three sentences without getting lost.

 

Other than that, I will sincerely appreciate your help.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

This was already explained in the other thread. Why did you think you had to start another one?

From the posts and answers you get, you should know that this is not needed. 

I had a short answer that covered it but you think you long winded post does better?

You act like a very vain man. Vanity is a sin. Did you know that?

If you are retarded then you wouldt know better and would not be held responsable but you dont seem retarded. sort of like you want to be above other people.

Nice.  The verse clearly says that all non-believers should be brought forth to be slain at the feet of Jesus.  Bill "explains away" that brutal command by saying, "No, no!  What he means is that all JEWS are going to be tortured for eternity!"

See, that's a much, much nicer way of saying it.

And, of course, this is the exact same rhetoric that justified killing 6 million of them.  The common phrase from the church hierarchy was, "I care not what you do to their bodies, their souls belong to God."

What kind of sick, twisted individual would actually be proud of supporting such a capricious, hateful, intolerant God? . . . Answer: All Christians.

Originally Posted by Unobtanium:

Nice.  The verse clearly says that all non-believers should be brought forth to be slain at the feet of Jesus.  Bill "explains away" that brutal command by saying, "No, no!  What he means is that all JEWS are going to be tortured for eternity!"

See, that's a much, much nicer way of saying it.

And, of course, this is the exact same rhetoric that justified killing 6 million of them.  The common phrase from the church hierarchy was, "I care not what you do to their bodies, their souls belong to God."

What kind of sick, twisted individual would actually be proud of supporting such a capricious, hateful, intolerant God? . . . Answer: All Christians.

 

 

You must be retarded. I explained the verse just like it means. If you had any mind you would know it dont mean kill other people. That is just your ungodly acting. It is acting because you know it doesn't mean that. You need to stop lying and being a butthole.

quote:    Originally Posted by rum_mama:

This was already explained in the other thread.  Why did you think you had to start another one?  From the posts and answers you get, you should know that this is not needed.  I had a short answer that covered it but you think you long winded post does better?  You act like a very vain man.  Vanity is a sin. Did you know that?  If you are retarded then you wouldt know better and would not be held responsable but you dont seem retarded.  sort of like you want to be above other people.


Hi Rum,

 

Yes, you gave a very good, concise answer in the other discussion.  And, here, I gave a more detailed answer.  As a Christian, you should be happy to see both.   Having spent about 35 years in computer sales/marketing; I learned that the most effective way to present a product is to:  (1) Tell them what you are going to tell them, then, (2) Tell them, and, finally, (3) Tell them what you have told them.  This way, you have covered the entire audience and everyone understands.

 

This new discussion was meant as no slight to you.  It  was only meant to help those who want to understand, to understand.  And, for those atheist who are determined to not understand (or, at least, who pretend they do not understand) -- it is salt in the wound.  I feel you did explain the issue well in a concise manner.  Keep up the good work.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

 Look at bill telling crusty that he can't offer a correct explanation of god's word, meaning I guess that bill thinks he can explain it. The "explanation" seems to be whatever bill and his ilk want it to be. The problem isn't that people don't understand the bible. The problem they have is scrambling to do "damage control" while trying to persuade people to buy into the fairy tale.

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Hi to my Forum Friends,


  If you will refer back to my discussion titled  "Natural Man, Carnal Man, Spiritual Man - Which Are You?" -- you will find these three described in greater detail.



God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

=============================================================

And if YOU will refer back to the "discussion" you had with yourself titled "Natural Man, Carnal Man, Spiritual Man - Which Are You?" , you will find that there were exactly ZERO replies to it.

 

Now why would that be?

 

Of course I'm sure that you'll interpret that as a sign that everyone who didn't reply is surely hellbound and that you need to work harder at preaching your version of how the bible says things are supposed to go down.  I have NO doubts about that.

 

What does surprise me is that not one person from your self proclaimed "Invisible Lurking Fan Club(tm)" didn't pipe up and at least give ya a "hell yeah!"

 

 

 

Do you ever stop to ask yourself why the only replies you ever seem to get to your sermons (if you even get any) are from people who are telling you that you're full of crap?

 

They see right through you. You aren't fooling anybody but yourself.

 

I have noticed that I don't hear any more of that 'literal and inerrant' garbage from you these days... What's up with that?

 

Hmm.... Could it be that yer boy Camping rather flamboyantly tossed THAT particular line of thinking straight into the dumpster awhile back?

 

Could it be that even you realize that if the bible really WAS 'literal and inerrant', you wouldn't have anything to talk about? To "interpret?"

 

Even the most devout christians on this forum are telling you you're fulluvit. I think they reply mostly like I do to your tirades just for entertainment. Just so they can watch you stand up and dance a jig and hit your head on the ceiling every single time.

 

You're a court jester, BeeG.  Dance for us. We get a kick outta it. We really do.

 

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Jennifer:

LOL!!! God loves g a y s? I guess that little "put them to death" thingy is just another sign of your god's "love".

LOL.

I know r_m is trolling, but.....

Don'tcha just love it when their half-assed attempts at insults contradict their own supposed beliefs-And they DON'T catch it in time?

 

LMMFAO!

DOH!

Originally Posted by Road Puppy:
Originally Posted by Jennifer:

LOL!!! God loves g a y s? I guess that little "put them to death" thingy is just another sign of your god's "love".

LOL.

I know r_m is trolling, but.....

Don'tcha just love it when their half-assed attempts at insults contradict their own supposed beliefs-And they DON'T catch it in time?

 

LMMFAO!

DOH!

 

 

Are you retarded. Is that your picture? You look g a y in that wife beater shirt but i bet you think you are cool. You think talking ugly and cussin makes you a man. you have the right name puppy. God still loves you. Repent now so you don't go to hell.

Hi all,

 

These last few posts are what I have often labeled as hijacking or a "spitting contest" -- and, why I often just leave a discussion and begin a new one.  Who wants to get into a "he said -- she said" or a "she said -- she said" spitting contest which has nothing whatsoever to do with the original discussion?

 

But, I suppose that is human nature; especially with our atheist Friends such as Jennifer, et al,  who really do not want us to be discussing God or any Christian issues -- who will hijack the discussion and talk about the most irrelevant issues possible -- anything except God, Jesus Christ, Christianity, or the Bible.

 

"And the beat goes on, and the beat goes on" -- as Sonny and Cher sang many years ago.   Or, as the Bible better expresses it, in Ecclesiastes 1:9, "That which has been is that which will be, And that which has been done is that which will be done. So there is nothing new under the sun."

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Originally Posted by rum_mama:
Originally Posted by Road Puppy:
Originally Posted by Jennifer:

LOL!!! God loves g a y s? I guess that little "put them to death" thingy is just another sign of your god's "love".

LOL.

I know r_m is trolling, but.....

Don'tcha just love it when their half-assed attempts at insults contradict their own supposed beliefs-And they DON'T catch it in time?

 

LMMFAO!

DOH!

 

 

Are you retarded. Is that your picture? You look g a y in that wife beater shirt but i bet you think you are cool. You think talking ugly and cussin makes you a man. you have the right name puppy. God still loves you. Repent now so you don't go to hell.


=========================================================

 

LMAO! Why the hell would I wanna repent? I wasn't pent in the first place.

You wouldn't know a g ay guy if one jumped in bed with ya. 

 

  Your meds need uppin', buf.

 

 

Last edited by Road Puppy

Hi all,


"And the beat goes on, and the beat goes on" -- as Sonny and Cher sang many years ago.   Or, as the Bible better expresses it, in Ecclesiastes 1:9, "That which has been is that which will be, And that which has been done is that which will be done. So there is nothing new under the sun."

 

I guess the only thing I could add to the "spitting contest" which has evolved in this discussion in -- "Well, DUH!"  (Just for you, Crusty!)

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Originally Posted by Rramnlimnn_TheGreat:

Pup, I’m gonna have to admit that pose looks g a y to me.

Hahaha along with that mullet.

********************************************************************************************

 

RP has long hair.
The mullet is a hairstyle that is short at the front and sides, and long in the back.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×