Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

From the link, this quote:

According to the US Department of Justice statistics, 84 percent of white people killed every year are killed by other whites. In 2011, there were more cases of whites killing whites than there were of blacks killing blacks. Between 1980 to 2008, a majority (53.3 percent) of gang-related murders were committed by white people, with a majority of the homicide victims being white as well.

But if we go to the imbedded link, we find no mention of the race of victims.

Although all the crimes mentioned could be perpetrated by gang members, there is no specific mention of gangs.

No doubt there is more white-on-white and black-on-black crime than race on race.  All you have to do is look at the demographics of any neighborhood to determine who's committing the criminal acts.

And to say that more whites kill whites than blacks kill blacks is to say there are more whites than blacks.  [hold on - read on] 

But this from the embedded link:

The percentages of adult white and black arrestees for murder were similar, with 50.0 percent being white, and 48.0 percent being black.

which is truly disturbing when Blacks comprise only 12.6% of the US population

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...s#Race_and_ethnicity 

Pandemic?  Hardly.

Someone should have learned not to let others do their homework.

FACT 1. Over 1,400 more black Americans murdered other blacks in two years than were lynched from 1882 to 1968.

According to FBI data, 4,906 black people murdered other blacks in 2010 and 2011. That is 1,460 more black Americans killed by other blacks in two years than were lynched from 1882 to 1968, according to the Tuskegee Institute.

FACT 2. Black People (mostly men) commit a grossly disproportionate amount of crime.

In 2012, white males were 38 percent of the population and committed 4,582 murders. That same year, black males were just 6.6 percent of the population but committed a staggering 5,531 murders.

In other words: black people–at just a fifth of the size–committed almost 1,000 more murders than their white counterparts.

The figures above highlight a horrific truth that black racialists and white liberals routinely ignore: Lawbreaking black Americans, young black males particularly, put themselves in close proximity to (mostly white male) police officers at rates sometimes five to 10 times higher than whites. This is a recipe for disaster. Thusly….

FACT 3. Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks committed half of homicides in the United States for nearly 30 years.

DOJ statistics show that between 1980 and 2008, black people committed 52% of homicides.

In 2013, black criminals committed 38% of the murders. Whites accounted for just 31 percent.

There are five times fewer black people than white people in America and, yet, they consistently carry out a larger share of the crimes? Given this rate, it’s no wonder that there aren’t more assistances where cops kill black criminals.

FACT 4. Chicago’s death toll is almost equal to that of both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, combined.

There have been almost as many deaths in one American city as there have been in the two major wars carried out by the U.S. military this century.

Chicago’s death toll from 2001November, 26 2015 stands at 7,401. The combined total deaths during Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003-2015: 4,815) and Operation Enduring Freedom/Afghanistan (2001-2015: 3,506), total 8,321.

FACT 5. It would take cops 40 years to kill as many black men as have died at the hands of others black men in 2012 alone.

University of Toledo criminologist Dr. Richard R. Johnson examined the latest crime data from the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports and Centers for Disease Control and found that an average of 4,472 black men were killed by other black men annually between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2012.

Professor Johnson’s research further concluded that 112 black men died from both justified and unjustified police-involved killings annually during this same period.

The mainstream American media is, again, happily hitting the Black Lives Matter crack pipe in its pernicious pursuit of high ratings. These blood-lusting junkies were nowhere to be found when, with haunting predictability, Chicago news headline after headline detailed the carnage that has consumed dozens of communities in that city where black men kill each other with terrifying regularity.

Where were these Black Lives Matter protesters after the slaying of Chicago’s little Tyshawn Lee, the 9-year-old lured into an alley and shot to death by a black man seeking gang-related vengeance against his father?

Did little Tyshawn’s murder at the hands of a black gangster–an all too common occurrence in Chicago–not warrant wall-to-wall news coverage or Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson-style calls for “justice”?

No.

From 1980 through 2008, 84 percent of white victims were killed by whites and 93 percent of black victims were killed by blacks.

Let’s look at the numbers for the most recent years using the FBI’s annual Crime in the United States reports:

 

 

Percentage of blacks murdered by blacks

Percentage of whites murdered by whites

2009

91

84

2010

90

83

2011

91

83

2012

91

84

2013

90

83

There are some important caveats about these numbers -- most importantly is that they don’t include every murder. The data only reflects murders that involved a single victim and offender and when the race of the offender was known and reported by police to the FBI.

giftedamateur posted:

Are you like a failed, frustrated, journalist wannabe? What's alarming is your need to make thread after thread on uninteresting subjects.

In words that rarely complete a sentence, headlines of certain publications such as HP and PFAW are designed to instruct liberals what to think.  And the liberal's interpretation of same, in absolute conflict with the content of the article, is proof it works.  Actually, the articles aren't really meant to be read given the embedded links they reference for credibility, and demonstrably, liberals don't read.

Letting others do their thinking for them is just the liberal way.  Yet they can't help but profess it.  Therein lies the answers to your questions.

Bless their hearts.

 

Last edited by budsfarm
Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Are you like a failed, frustrated, journalist wannabe? What's alarming is your need to make thread after thread on uninteresting subjects.

____

It caught your interest and Jack's (Jerk's) and dire's and probably that of the forum harridan when she gins up sufficient bile.

Old Condie got caught and is trying to back out of the hole he dug himself.  At least, this time he knows to stop digging.

direstraits posted:
Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Are you like a failed, frustrated, journalist wannabe? What's alarming is your need to make thread after thread on uninteresting subjects.

____

It caught your interest and Jack's (Jerk's) and dire's and probably that of the forum harridan when she gins up sufficient bile.

Old Condie got caught and is trying to back out of the hole he dug himself.  At least, this time he knows to stop digging.

____

My, My!  How you do stretch and strain in your impotent, miserable failed attempt to get a gotcha!

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:
Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Are you like a failed, frustrated, journalist wannabe? What's alarming is your need to make thread after thread on uninteresting subjects.

____

It caught your interest and Jack's (Jerk's) and dire's and probably that of the forum harridan when she gins up sufficient bile.

Old Condie got caught and is trying to back out of the hole he dug himself.  At least, this time he knows to stop digging.

____

My, My!  How you do stretch and strain in your impotent, miserable failed attempt to get a gotcha!

Got caught in you failed attempt to prove that somehow there was a terrible crime wave amongst whites that supposedly was unreported.  Anyone with the slightest knowledge of crime statistics would know the opposite was true.

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:
Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Are you like a failed, frustrated, journalist wannabe? What's alarming is your need to make thread after thread on uninteresting subjects.

____

It caught your interest and Jack's (Jerk's) and dire's and probably that of the forum harridan when she gins up sufficient bile.

Old Condie got caught and is trying to back out of the hole he dug himself.  At least, this time he knows to stop digging.

____

My, My!  How you do stretch and strain in your impotent, miserable failed attempt to get a gotcha!

My, my, how you do carry on when you are caught!

giftedamateur posted:
Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:
Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Are you like a failed, frustrated, journalist wannabe? What's alarming is your need to make thread after thread on uninteresting subjects.

____

It caught your interest and Jack's (Jerk's) and dire's and probably that of the forum harridan when she gins up sufficient bile.

Old Condie got caught and is trying to back out of the hole he dug himself.  At least, this time he knows to stop digging.

____

My, My!  How you do stretch and strain in your impotent, miserable failed attempt to get a gotcha!

My, my, how you do carry on when you are caught!

Its happening to him more and more now.  Reverts to deflection and crawfishes.

direstraits posted:
giftedamateur posted:
Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:
Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Are you like a failed, frustrated, journalist wannabe? What's alarming is your need to make thread after thread on uninteresting subjects.

____

It caught your interest and Jack's (Jerk's) and dire's and probably that of the forum harridan when she gins up sufficient bile.

Old Condie got caught and is trying to back out of the hole he dug himself.  At least, this time he knows to stop digging.

____

My, My!  How you do stretch and strain in your impotent, miserable failed attempt to get a gotcha!

My, my, how you do carry on when you are caught!

Its happening to him more and more now.  Reverts to deflection and crawfishes.

___

My! My! how my fan club continues to stretch for gotchas.  The factual information I posted on white-on-white crime made no claims about the relative extent of black-on-black murders versus white-on-white murders.  My information simply pointed out that there is indeed a lot of white-on-white crime.  The introduction of comparative information into the discussion, with the smug and wrongheaded assertion that somehow that challenges what I actually posted represents a logical fallacy.  Dispute my actual information if you wish, but do it without bringing in a straw man argument.

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:
giftedamateur posted:
Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:
Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Are you like a failed, frustrated, journalist wannabe? What's alarming is your need to make thread after thread on uninteresting subjects.

____

It caught your interest and Jack's (Jerk's) and dire's and probably that of the forum harridan when she gins up sufficient bile.

Old Condie got caught and is trying to back out of the hole he dug himself.  At least, this time he knows to stop digging.

____

My, My!  How you do stretch and strain in your impotent, miserable failed attempt to get a gotcha!

My, my, how you do carry on when you are caught!

Its happening to him more and more now.  Reverts to deflection and crawfishes.

___

My! My! how my fan club continues to stretch for gotchas.  The factual information I posted on white-on-white crime made no claims about the relative extent of black-on-black murders versus white-on-white murders.  My information simply pointed out that there is indeed a lot of white-on-white crime.  The introduction of comparative information into the discussion, with the smug and wrongheaded assertion that somehow that challenges what I actually posted represents a logical fallacy.  Dispute my actual information if you wish, but do it without bringing in a straw man argument.

You got nothing except another example of you're not reading your own postings.

So thanks for providing further insight into a lazy mind.

Last edited by budsfarm

Leftie reporters, many unpaid, write this trash for the HuffingPuff, to reinforce the prejudices of their leftie readers.  Most are too ignorant of math and/or too lazy to research what's behind the articles.

This is the same clueless idiots calling Republicans fascists, with no clue what fascism is or that it most resembles their own economic beliefs.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×