Skip to main content

quote:
Sez junior samples:
I would also like to add how much i admire Bill and his post.The man has taken so much flak and still holds his ground.Bill keep up your good work and know your reward is waiting on you!



I would ask that you all please excuse my good forum friend junior. He thinks Bill is...well, Bill Dance. At some point junior mistook one of Bills biblical quotes "I will make you fishers of men" for...fishermen.
It's OK junior. We love you! Wink
quote:
Originally posted by Unobtanium:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
Take my name in vain if you like -- but, please respect my God. Even if one does not believe in God; they should respect the fact that others do.

why? no, seriously; why?

IF WE HAVE TO EXPLAIN "RESPECT" TO YOU; THEN IT WOULD BE LIKE SPITTING INTO THE WIND ANYWAY!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Spaghetti_Boy_1b
quote:
Originally posted by Capt James T:
quote:

So, the old adage, "When in doubt - don't!" would apply here. If there is a possibility of offending others; it is better to use a different exclamation to begin your sentence.

What is laughable is soooooo many people here have stated that they dont like the fact that Bill preaches about how 'his' belief is the ONLY belief, and no one else could possibly be right (which I am sure is insulting and offensive to them), yet Bill continues to speak about how we shouldn't say anything that might be 'offensive' to someone else. Pitiful.

I don't have a problem in the world with what Bill believes, and I dont normally argue with him about religion. I do have a problem when he hypocritically asks someone not to say something because it is offensive to him. What right does he have to dictate others morality?

Hi Cap, et al (don't want to exclude all your other posting names),

There is a world of difference between refuting a false or cultic religion -- and being personally offensive toward another. If you will think about, I am sure that you will be able to figure this out.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_Piggy
Bill, you seem to put the phrase false religion or false teaching in every post. That is offensive to everyone who doesn't share your particuar belief. I am pretty sure you will find it offensive when I say your teachings are false and your Bible is a contradictory pack of lies.
You are happy in the way you believe and I am happy for you. You have found comfort and fulfillment in your beliefs and I would never want to take that from you. If every post you read started out with Bill, you believe in the wrong God and you are spreading lies, it wouldn't be long until you were offended by it. I see your "side" and I disagree with it. That's all. I am not going to tell you you are wrong. I would just like the courteousy of you accepting my beliefs work for me and don't treat me like an idiot for not believing just like you do. I don't think Christians are idiots, just confused.
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
quote:
Originally posted by Unobtanium:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
Take my name in vain if you like -- but, please respect my God. Even if one does not believe in God; they should respect the fact that others do.

why? no, seriously; why?

IF WE HAVE TO EXPLAIN "RESPECT" TO YOU; THEN IT WOULD BE LIKE SPITTING INTO THE WIND ANYWAY!


To get respect-You must first be respectable.
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
Hi Cap, et al (don't want to exclude all your other posting names),

There is a world of difference between refuting a false or cultic religion -- and being personally offensive toward another. If you will think about, I am sure that you will be able to figure this out.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill


Hey again Bill,

You can use any name you wish, as long as you use the correct name and not an insulting segment of the name, which is offensive to me (and we know how much you wish to not be offensive, right?). My name tends to not hide much, and those that know me know me well. The proper and acceptable shorthand of 'Captain' is 'Capt.' to most folks, if you are unable to type the entire thing. But, after looking at the length of most of your posts, I would say that it is more of a little jab at me. Hypocritical, isnt it, considering your posts on personal attacks?

As for your 'refuting' false teachings, you can justify it any way you wish, but more than one person here has told you it offended them the way you go about it. More than one person has told you that they find you offensive. Yet you continue to post here. Thats your right.

What you dont have the right to do is expect anyone to tiptoe around your feelings and be respectful to you, when you have shown no one else the same courtesy. You are on a mission to share and teach your beliefs, true, but you take no one elses feelings into consideration as you do it. Yes, you want people like NSNS here, not because it gives you a chance to spread the word, but it gives you the chance to talk down to someone else and attempt to show how they are wrong in their beliefs. I truely think you could not survive without the forums. Where else could you go where there are so many like NSNS that would welcome you in and not slam the front door in your face? I don't think you are comfortable with a large group of people that believe as you do......

Captain
Last edited by Capt James T
quote:
Originally posted by Capt James T:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
Hi Cap, et al (don't want to exclude all your other posting names),

There is a world of difference between refuting a false or cultic religion -- and being personally offensive toward another. If you will think about, I am sure that you will be able to figure this out.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill


Hey again Bill,

You can use any name you wish, as long as you use the correct name and not an insulting segment of the name, which is offensive to me (and we know how much you wish to not be offensive, right?). My name tends to not hide much, and those that know me know me well. The proper and acceptable shorthand of 'Captain' is 'Capt.' to most folks, if you are unable to type the entire thing. But, after looking at the length of most of your posts, I would say that it is more of a little jab at me. Hypocritical, isnt it, considering your posts on personal attacks?

As for your 'refuting' false teachings, you can justify it any way you wish, but more than one person here has told you it offended them the way you go about it. More than one person has told you that they find you offensive. Yet you continue to post here. Thats your right.

What you dont have the right to do is expect anyone to tiptoe around your feelings and be respectful to you, when you have shown no one else the same courtesy. You are on a mission to share and teach your beliefs, true, but you take no one elses feelings into consideration as you do it. Yes, you want people like NSNS here, not because it gives you a chance to spread the word, but it gives you the chance to talk down to someone else and attempt to show how they are wrong in their beliefs. I truely think you could not survive without the forums. Where else could you go where there are so many like NSNS that would welcome you in and not slam the front door in your face? I don't think you are comfortable with a large group of people that believe as you do......

Captain


Very Well stated Captain .
quote:
Originally posted by AtticFeline:
This is why so many people started using OMB a few years ago. It stands for Oh My Bill.

Hi Feline,

quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
Even if one does not believe in God; they should respect the fact that others do.
Bill


That goes both ways, Bill. If you're not an atheist or agnostic, you should show respect to those that are.
quote:
There is a world of difference between refuting a false or cultic religion -- and being personally offensive toward another. If you will think about, I am sure that you will be able to figure this out.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

So bill, you have a problem with anyone "refuting" your religion but you have zero problem doing it to others? I've seen what the "christians" here have to say about Catholics, Mormons, COC and other religions or non-believers. How in the world can you take offense at anything anyone posts when you and others post some of the things you do about others? IF you never answer another question for me, please explain how you can call their religions "cults" and worse. And do this without quoting the bible. Just tell me how YOU feel you can call names, disrespect other's beliefs or non-beliefs, and still take offense to something someone else posts. And some of you even have the nerve to tell those people to leave a public forum. Tell me, where do you get the nerve to do that?
quote:
Originally posted by semiannualchick:
quote:
Originally posted by AtticFeline:
This is why so many people started using OMB a few years ago. It stands for Oh My Bill.

quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
Even if one does not believe in God; they should respect the fact that others do.
Bill

That goes both ways, Bill. If you're not an atheist or agnostic, you should show respect to those that are.

Hi Chick,

There is a big difference between showing respect for a person and refuting their teachings. I like you, Deep, Jennifer, Jan, and many of the other non-believers. But, I will refute non-Christian statements and claims posted on the Forum.

That is not disrespect for the person -- but, shining what I know to be the Christian Light upon false teaching. How could anyone respect a Christian who will not defend Christian Truth?

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT
CLEARLY, IT IS BILL GRAY WHO GETS A SPECIAL THRILL OUT OF OFFENDING OTHERS (WHILE INSISTING THAT OTHERS NOT OFFEND HIM).

Doing the things that one demands others not to do = hy·poc·ri·sy
Telling someone they are a hypocrite on a religion forum = 2¢
Having the person it's directed to be the only one who cannot see it = PRICELESS

Since this thread was started in my honor, I guess Bill would like a response.

I do not respect your god.
I do not respect your belief.
I do not respect you.

Does that help you understand why I see no problem using the exclamation of "OMG!"

Do you watch tv Bill? I hear that exclamation on many shows, do you turn them off? Do you sit in a room isolated from the rest of the world where terms like "OMG" or "Gosh Darnit" are spoken with out any thought what so ever to your personal god? If so then maybe you should venture out. Its not nearly as scary as you probably think.

If I thought you had any respect for my views, then this might have gone a different way. You have demonstrated over and over again that you don't. You ask me to respect your belief and your god, yet you have never shown that kind of respect for my non-belief in said god. Soooo....you get what you give sucker!

You don't respect others religion you call them cults and false teachings.

You don't respect even christians that believe as you do. I have seen you tear apart a post by fellow christians and "correct" them.

You have ask me to have respect for a god that #1 I don't believe in. #2 even if I did, I would have no respect for someone so vindictive and cruel to the beings he supposedly created.
quote:
"Hi Jan, As a Forum Friend who believes strongly that we can debate and even disagree, without offending one another -- please do not use the name of my Lord and God as your exclamation point. If you are going to use OMG (which every intelligent person knows means "Oh, my God!") -- let it be the beginning of a serious prayer.

Otherwise, you are offending the God I worship and you are offending me and all Christian believers. I realize you are not a believer; but we are -- and, as a Forum Friend, I ask that you begin your sentence in another way. I know that you are intelligent and can honor this request."



Holy Smokes!...Jeesus dancin' onna' cracker!

You cannot possibly be so daft as to request someone respect YOUR worship when you stomp on others "feelings" with your " I am the way" godboots...
You're not serious...are you?
quote:
Posted 17 December 2010 11:21 PM Hide Post

quote:
Originally posted by themax:
Yes, it is offensive to me. If one wants to address my God they should do so with the regard he demands.



we do. that is why there is a small g here in "god." i do not respect your belief and you have no right to expect it.


"We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful god, who creates faulty humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes.” Gene Roddenberry

Posts: 738 | Location: In Your Head | Registered: 15 September 2010



And that is your right, I may not agree but it is still your right.
quote:
Originally posted by themax:
quote:
Posted 17 December 2010 11:21 PM Hide Post

quote:
Originally posted by themax:
Yes, it is offensive to me. If one wants to address my God they should do so with the regard he demands.



we do. that is why there is a small g here in "god." i do not respect your belief and you have no right to expect it.


"We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful god, who creates faulty humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes.” Gene Roddenberry

Posts: 738 | Location: In Your Head | Registered: 15 September 2010



And that is your right, I may not agree but it is still your right.


And this is what I think Joy is talking about when she mentions the difference between her and Bill. You have to respect others beliefs, even if they are not inline with yours, before you can ever ask anyone to respect yours. You don't have to agree with them.

If you are going to take on the responsibility to TEACH, you have to take into consideration what your actions add to your message. He is not teaching people the Love of Christ, he is teaching them the intolerance that some religious zealots develop. I dont think he has any interest in winning people here over to Christ, he sure does not act like it. Personally, if I were approached by someone like Bill, I would question anything he tried to TEACH me. It has nothing to do with the message and everything to do with the messenger.

Joy is correct, you can minister to others without passing judgement on them. Unfortunately, for all the knowledge Bill has of the bible, he lacks this very simple ability.

Captain
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
quote:
Originally posted by thenagel:
Bill is so cute.

he thinks he's significant. that's so sweet.

OMG isn't offensive to anyone who has a grip.

it's necessary to use the three letter version, or the whole phrase, 'Oh my god' at any point i feel the need to use it.

that's the good thing about being an adult. i say what i want, where i want, when i want, because i want, and i don't have to pretend to be interested in what you think about it.

AND, WOULD YOU WONDER IF ANYONE QUESTIONS IF YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN - OR ONLY WEAR THE HAT WHEN IT IS CONVENIENT?


i don't wonder, i've said that i'm not. and i dont' wear the hat whether it's convient or not.
Capt,

Do I know you? Have we met here before? Smiler You seem very familiar but I can't figure it out.

If you don't want to say here you could email me at jankinonya@gmail.com. Since we no longer have PM's that is my email account for the forums.

If you don't want to say at all, I do understand. I will just have to live with the mystery.Smiler
quote:
Originally posted by A. Robustus:
Surely Bill, you wouldn't demand that anything and everything that might be offensive to someone be verboten? If not, then why should any particular group or person have their emotional sensibilities protected against possible offense?

Hi Robust,

Why would ANYONE want to be personally offensive to another person or group -- on purpose?

It is one thing to refute a false teaching. This can be done by sharing the truth of that false teaching and showing the Truth of Christianity.

It is quite another thing to launch a personal attack against another or their beliefs just to be offensive -- which is what you seem to be claiming the right to do.

In this world, we cannot stop people from being offensive; we can only tell them when we feel that they or their comments are offensive -- and hope that the person is intelligent enough and decent enough to respect those feelings.

On the other hand, we have to realize that there are people who will, like predatory animals, attack others just for the thrill of it. These folks we just have to leave to themselves and out of polite, civil society.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
quote:
Originally posted by A. Robustus:
Surely Bill, you wouldn't demand that anything and everything that might be offensive to someone be verboten? If not, then why should any particular group or person have their emotional sensibilities protected against possible offense?

Hi Robust,

Why would ANYONE want to be personally offensive to another person or group -- on purpose?

It is one thing to refute a false teaching. This can be done by sharing the truth of that false teaching and showing the Truth of Christianity.

It is quite another thing to launch a personal attack against another or their beliefs just to be offensive -- which is what you seem to be claiming the right to do.

In this world, we cannot stop people from being offensive; we can only tell them when we feel that they or their comments are offensive -- and hope that the person is intelligent enough and decent enough to respect those feelings.

On the other hand, we have to realize that there are people who will, like predatory animals, attack others just for the thrill of it. These folks we just have to leave to themselves and out of polite, civil society.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Bill, your "truth" is not my truth. And thinking that you are right doesn't place you above complete hypocrisy. If you think Jank "launched" a "personal attack" on you by typing OMG, then you are ridiculous and without a useful sense compass. Of all the things you could possibly ask for, you have no standing in this regard. As for me, I could be wrong but I don't believe that I've ever been told that I've been offensive to anyone on the forum. You on the other hand, are told you are offensive several times per day and do nothing to "respect" the feelings of others. Broken record but, you have absolutely no legitimate claim here. You are losing ground every time type about this. Keep it up.
Hi Fish,

You say, "Bill, your "truth" is not my truth. And thinking that you are right doesn't place you above complete hypocrisy . If you think Jank "launched" a "personal attack" on you by typing OMG, then you are ridiculous and without a useful sense compass. Of all the things you could possibly ask for, you have no standing in this regard."

No where have I written that Jan "launched" a "personal attack" on me. What I said was that the use of OMG is offensive to all Christian believers -- for it is taking the name of the God we worship in vain. It is mocking His name -- and that does offend all Christians.

Did I consider this a personal attack against me? No. And, this is just your atheist/agnostic/secular humanist/atheist attempt to twist what others write. Take the ability to twist and spin untruths into supposed truths from all atheists -- and they would have no legs to stand on. And, you, my Friend, have, for the last four years, been a perfect example of this twist/spin approach.

Then, you declare, "As for me, I could be wrong but I don't believe that I've ever been told that I've been offensive to anyone on the forum. You on the other hand, are told you are offensive several times per day and do nothing to "respect" the feelings of others. Broken record but, you have absolutely no legitimate claim here. You are losing ground every time type about this. Keep it up."

The only reason YOU have not been called offensive -- is because the majority of those who actively post on the Religion Forum are members of your Richard Dawson Atheist Gang. Many Christian believers read the posts, but most prefer to stay out of the arena where blood is being splattered. I can't say that I blame them -- for you atheists can, at times, become very nasty in your attacks against Christians and Christianity. I am not saying that to be nasty; but, only speaking the truth.

Your Friends may never have told you that you are being offensive; but, trust me -- you have perfected the art of being offensive to anything or anyone who appears to be Christian. And, regardless of which name or names you are using now -- that has never changed.

Shall we talk about the real attacks you have launched against me? Like attempting to send my wife an e-mail pretending to be a woman who supposedly had an affair with me. Or creating a posting name using my real name in an attempt to make people think your tripe was written by me. Or your little trick with the avatar. Yes, my Friend, you have been offensive many times. Only your Friends just write it off as just you being yourself. And, I do suppose there is a lot of truth in that.

If you consider me refuting your false religion of atheism (or as you told us before, you went from atheism, to agnosticism, to human secularism, and back to atheism) to be offensive; then, my Friend, you have my promise -- I intend to stay "offensive" to all false and cult religions. That is how I help, in some small way, others to put on the Full Armor of God in defense against your false religions.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1Full_Armor-OUTLINE
quote:
If you consider me refuting your false religion of atheism (or as you told us before, you went from atheism, to agnosticism, to human secularism, and back to atheism) to be offensive; then, my Friend, you have my promise -- I intend to stay "offensive" to all false and cult religions. That is how I help, in some small way, others to put on the Full Armor of God in defense against your false religions.

And bill, others will continue to post what you think is "offensive". You can't have your cake and eat it too.
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
Hi Fish,

You say, "Bill, your "truth" is not my truth. And thinking that you are right doesn't place you above complete hypocrisy . If you think Jank "launched" a "personal attack" on you by typing OMG, then you are ridiculous and without a useful sense compass. Of all the things you could possibly ask for, you have no standing in this regard."

No where have I written that Jan "launched" a "personal attack" on me. What I said was that the use of OMG is offensive to all Christian believers -- for it is taking the name of the God we worship in vain. It is mocking His name -- and that does offend all Christians.

Did I consider this a personal attack against me? No. And, this is just your atheist/agnostic/secular humanist/atheist attempt to twist what others write. Take the ability to twist and spin untruths into supposed truths from all atheists -- and they would have no legs to stand on. And, you, my Friend, have, for the last four years, been a perfect example of this twist/spin approach.

Then, you declare, "As for me, I could be wrong but I don't believe that I've ever been told that I've been offensive to anyone on the forum. You on the other hand, are told you are offensive several times per day and do nothing to "respect" the feelings of others. Broken record but, you have absolutely no legitimate claim here. You are losing ground every time type about this. Keep it up."

The only reason YOU have not been called offensive -- is because the majority of those who actively post on the Religion Forum are members of your Richard Dawson Atheist Gang. Many Christian believers read the posts, but most prefer to stay out of the arena where blood is being splattered. I can't say that I blame them -- for you atheists can, at times, become very nasty in your attacks against Christians and Christianity. I am not saying that to be nasty; but, only speaking the truth.

Your Friends may never have told you that you are being offensive; but, trust me -- you have perfected the art of being offensive to anything or anyone who appears to be Christian. And, regardless of which name or names you are using now -- that has never changed.

Shall we talk about the real attacks you have launched against me? Like attempting to send my wife an e-mail pretending to be a woman who supposedly had an affair with me. Or creating a posting name using my real name in an attempt to make people think your tripe was written by me. Or your little trick with the avatar. Yes, my Friend, you have been offensive many times. Only your Friends just write it off as just you being yourself. And, I do suppose there is a lot of truth in that.

If you consider me refuting your false religion of atheism (or as you told us before, you went from atheism, to agnosticism, to human secularism, and back to atheism) to be offensive; then, my Friend, you have my promise -- I intend to stay "offensive" to all false and cult religions. That is how I help, in some small way, others to put on the Full Armor of God in defense against your false religions.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill


Tisk Tisk, you silly man. I guess I touched a nerve. Every time that you're confronted with your own dripping hypocrisy you go on an attack in order to obfuscate and evade responsibility for your own actions. But you're fooling no one but yourself. I'll let the others decide who is making a better argument and who is making sense about being offensive and who is respectful.

As for everything else, I've told you before that I have never posted on this forum under any other name. That is and has always been the truth. Even others, who know me and "Fish" IN PERSON, have told you repeatedly that we are not the same person! Your angry paranoia is out of control, man. I guess I have to let my posts on the forum stand up for themselves versus yours, in regards to who is who and who is truthful and who plays dirty and will resort to disgraceful tactics for lack of being able to make a convincing point. I've seen you sink to low low depths here but this is so disgraceful, even for you. You are weak, and it shows Bill. I have tried to engage you in actual discussion and discourse from time to time and in return you always quickly try to drag me down to your filthy level because you can't stand up and compete. I really, really, really should know better!

-o-

...If anyone has any ideas on how I'm supposed to defend myself against Bill Gray's regular accusations that I'm "Fish" or anyone else (I guess I'm not DF anymore!), please let me know. If anyone knows how I'm supposed to respond every time I'm blamed by Bill Gray for the actions of someone else, please let me know. Thanks.

-o-

I guess wrongful defamation of character is the last resort of a powerless coward.
quote:
Originally posted by A. Robustus:
Every time that you're confronted with your own dripping hypocrisy you go on an attack in order to obfuscate and evade responsibility for your own actions. But you're fooling no one but yourself. I'll let the others decide who is making a better argument and who is making sense about being offensive and who is respectful.


Dont worry, few people here listen to Bill anyway. I'm surprised he is still debating with you, his M.O. seems to be to change the subject, and who he is talking to, when he is presented with an arguement he can't refute.

And trust me, its not just the athiests that find Bill offensive.....

Captain
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifer:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gray:
If you consider me refuting your false religion of atheism (or as you told us before, you went from atheism, to agnosticism, to human secularism, and back to atheism) to be offensive; then, my Friend, you have my promise -- I intend to stay "offensive" to all false and cult religions. That is how I help, in some small way, others to put on the Full Armor of God in defense against your false religions.

And bill, others will continue to post what you think is "offensive". You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Hi Jennifer,

I consider you a Friend, so, all I can do is to point out the faux pax many folks, both believers and non-believers, make. What you do with this is up to you as an individual. Go with your conscience and be blessed.

But, keep in mind, it is not just me who is offended; it is all Christian believers. As you said, you have Friends who are Christian -- would you intentionally offend them? I don't believe you would. So, offer the same consideration for all the other believers who read the Religion Forum. Shine me on if you like; but, consider the others who may not say anything; but, will still be offended.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT
Just so we are all clear, Bill said in his initial post:

quote:

I ask that you begin your sentence in another way. I know that you are intelligent and can honor this request.


This is not 'pointing out' the fact that this was offensive. This was implying that, to not honor Bills demand to not use the phrase means a person is stupid (or not 'intelligent'.) Bill could have simply started a thread explaining that OMG is, to him (and many Christians), offensive, without the demand to not use it. Instead, in his normal fashion, he had to demand that folks bend to his will.

Just so we are all reminded of what started this thread 5 pages or so ago. It was not an attempt to TEACH folks the real meaning behind OMG, it was attempt to tell someone else that his way of thinking is the 'right' way and theirs was the 'wrong' way.....

Captain
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifer:
quote:
As you said, you have Friends who are Christian -- would you intentionally offend them?

No, because they would not intentionally offend me the way some of the "christians" on this forum do, and you know exactly the ones I'm talking about.

Hi Jennifer,

So, you are "attacking" because you feel you have been "attacked." When have I ever attacked you or been nasty to you?

The "attack" frame of mind is not conducive to constructive discussions. An attack only encourages others to attack back -- as you say you are doing.

Let me suggest that we all put our attack arsenal away -- and have discussions. We can agree; we can disagree; we can even point out the error in another's beliefs -- without being nasty and destructive.

How about we all give it a try?

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT
quote:
Originally posted by Capt James T:
quote:
Originally posted by Not Shallow Not Slim:
It is my profound pleasure to bestow upon Capt. James Tiberius Kirk the Starfleet Award of Honor for meritorious posting above and beyond the call of duty.

And so noted.


nsns


Is there an awards dinner......

Big Grin


Yes. According to StarFleet tradition, you must buy me sushi now.

I'm pretty hungry, too.


nsns
quote:
So, you are "attacking" because you feel you have been "attacked." When have I ever attacked you or been nasty to you?

Asking you a simple question isn't attacking. I think that's all I've done. But when you get snippy with me or start posting long replies filled with bible quotes it gets tiresome. Then you defend those posts by insinuating I'm somehow "afraid" to read them. Beternun can't make a post without going to his dictionary or thesaurus, and you can't make a post without filling it with bible quotes. I'd be interested too to see where I used OMG in any posts. You know who I mean by the "christians" that like to attack first with thinly disguised insults, then when they get it going they attack full out. I'm civil to anyone on here that is civil to me. And I give them the first "punch". You ask if I would insult my christian friends and I said no, I ask you if you told your Mormon friend his religion was a cult and you wouldn't answer. I also ask why YOU didn't capitilize god when talking about the Mormons, you ask the atheists why they didn't capitalize god when posting. See the hypocrisy?
quote:
Originally posted by Capt James T:
bump - I thought it would be nice to see all of Bills wonderful OMG topics at the top of the screen Big Grin

NSNS - No sushi to be found out here in the great beyond, gotta give you a raincheck....

Captain


Now Don't be too quick, Sushi is simply fresh fish cooked at room temperature. Surely you can get some out of the River Wink

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×