Skip to main content

Kavanaugh Accuser’s Yearbooks Reveal Rampant Racism At Elite School

All night benders, alcohol-induced amnesia appeared to be the norm at Christine Blasey Ford’s high school

Girls who went to the all-female Holton-Arms preparatory school, attended by Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual assault accuser Christine Blasey Ford, engaged in casual racism at high school parties, class yearbooks show.

Taken from Holton-Arms yearbook: Scribe 84, pg. 150 / Credit: cultofthe1st.blogspot.com

On top of openly admitting to drunken debauchery, one 1984 yearbook recently scrubbed from the web depicted a costume party where a woman wore blackface and dressed as Buckwheat from The Little Rascals – even as a black female also attended the school.

Kavanaugh Accuser’s Yearbooks Reveal Rampant Racism At Elite School
 

Girls who went to the all-female Holton-Arms preparatory school, attended by Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual assault accuser Christine Blasey Ford, engaged in casual racism at high school parties, class yearbooks show.

Taken from Holton-Arms yearbook: Scribe 84, pg. 150 / Credit: cultofthe1st.blogspot.com

On top of openly admitting to drunken debauchery, one 1984 yearbook recently scrubbed from the web depicted a costume party where a woman wore blackface and dressed as Buckwheat from The Little Rascals – even as a black female also attended the school.

 

“At Cheryl’s multi-class party…[Redacted name] came as an uncanny Buckwheat, although she washed the makeup and afro off before the guys showed up,” one passage reads.

RELATED: BOMBSHELL: KAVANAUGH ACCUSER’S SALACIOUS HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOKS SCRUBBED

Commenting on the school’s apparent approval of casual racism, the Cult of the First Amendment blog which archived the yearbooks, noted the lax attitude over blackface costumes exemplified the student body’s “privileged attitude.”

From Holton-Arms yearbook Scribe 84, pg. 148 / Credit: cultofthe1st.blogspot.com

“Seeing such insensitive racism in action at this prestigious girls academy, attended by mostly white rich girls, provides context of the very privileged attitude exhibited by the Holton-Arms all female student body. That the Holton girls got these yearbooks approved by faculty and paid for by their parents shows just how powerful they were in their own right at such a young age,” notes the Cult of the First Amendment Blog.

 

In another account detailed in the same yearbook, two girls came to a party dressed as “veiled terrorists,” wearing full burqas and carrying guns.

“We were confronted by…a pair of veiled terrorists, [two redacted names], were the guns real or did you just want to get served first?” the yearbook reads, showing a picture of two women in Muslim-like attire.

Another Holton-Arms yearbook from 1982, when Blasey would have been a sophomore, also includes an off-color “Hiel Hitler” joke.

Following a Heavy.com article published on Sept. 17 covering Blasey Ford’s high school years, several yearbooks were deleted from the internet containing salacious details about the elitist WASP culture at Holton-Arms where binge drinking and “pass-out” parties were the norm.

It’s important to note that while extensive attention has been paid to the high school years of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, the media has thus far failed to cover these pertinent facts surrounding Blasey’s high school years, where a culture of drunken “multiple all night benders” and alcohol-induced amnesia, not to mention casual racism, appeared to be the norm.

Why were the yearbooks scrubbed?

Infowars has been banned by Facebook. Please help by sharing this article on your own Facebook page.

https://www.infowars.com/kavan...ism-at-elite-school/

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Former Scalia Law Clerk Bombshell Claim: ‘Compelling Evidence’ Will Exonerate Brett Kavanaugh Soon

(Gateway Pundit) – Accuser Christine Blasey Ford is waging a war on Trump’s SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh with decades-old, unsubstantiated claims of sexual assault in an effort to derail his confirmation to the Supreme Court.

Judge Kavanaugh has categorically denied the allegations and even told Senator Orin Hatch he wasn’t at the party in question.

Others have come out in defense of Kavanaugh such as witness Mark Judge who said in a letter he does not wish to speak publicly on the incident.

Mark Judge said in a letter sent by his legal counsel to Grassley, “I have no memory of this alleged incident..Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in..Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner..Ford describes”

Senator Dianne Feinstein circulated Christine Ford’s unredacted letter about the allegations against Kavanaugh to her staff –which of course was subsequently leaked to the media–Chuck Grassley, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee says he still hasn’t seen the unredacted letter even though he has after repeatedly asked for the document.

Feinstein is withholding evidence from the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Now this…

Ed Whelan, Justice Scalia’s former law clerk and president of conservative think tank the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), came out in defense of Brett Kavanaugh and said compelling evidence will come out next week exonerating Kavanaugh.

Ed Whelan: By one week from today, I expect that Judge Kavanaugh will have been clearly vindicated on this matter. Specifically, I expect that compelling evidence will show his categorical denial to be truthful. There will be no cloud over him.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.c...rett-kavanaugh-soon/

I remember a line, from one of the X-Men movie series, that said something to the effect ...  "Why do you ask questions for which you already know the answer"?   

You, I and most any reasonable person know why attempts to scrub yearbook information, and any other info revealing the highly political bias of the accuser.  As for the yearbook, from what I've heard reported, this girl was some party animal and would put the cast of "Animal House" to shame if not would pretty much duplicate it.   Sounds to me like her past was almost a mirror image of the movie "Animal House" and I think they are afraid that the entries, that were attempted to be scrubbed, will show someone that was a true party animal and quite often in a state of mind where the best description would be like the old Pink Floyd song "Comfortably Numb".

She also attempted to hide her previous political bias and activism but then, also as you know, our talking about "her" past, or to dare to question it is biased and unfair to her and the only important thing here is the weight of the accusation itself and not the accuser or her background.   

There was also, somewhere, a photo/picture that showed a fellow student to Brett that almost was an identical look alike to him but when Ms. Ford was asked about the possibility that she may have mixed the two up she was 1000% dogmatically sure that wasn't possible.  There are stories quite often telling about people getting released from prison due to it being proved that they were falsely accused even though the victim identified them 100% sure in court when they were convicted.  It's also telling just how fast Democrats are to convict the man as guilty even though the girl couldn't remember the exact place or date or even year this happened but to dare to question or want to question her about the specifics of her accusation is unfair to her and counted as further abuse.

I think you, I and most anyone that is "reasonable" knows exactly where all this comes from and why.  The sad part is if this works then what does this have to say for the future of our judicial system or even the future of politics in America?

The REAL interesting thing would imagine if in the mid-term elections the Republicans (and I don't think this will happen) keep the house and Senate and actually improve on their majority, and then yet another Supreme Court vacancy comes up.  CAN YOU IMAGINE what it will be like then, the moaning, crying, lunacy and rebelling that would go on?

I'll tell you though what would happen.  If, and when, the Democrats regained control of the House and Senate as well as the Executive office, and that will happen as all things go in cycles, the first thing I predict they would do is vote to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court so that they could then attempt to offset the Conservative majority that would have been established under Trump and when the Republicans were in control.  Oh well, enough for politics for now... I've had a good, lengthy rest from jumping into the fray and political discussions up and until now.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×