Skip to main content

Mike Goins can't stop taking cheap shots at persons who have expressed doubts or reservations in the past about economic development progress in the Shoals. Trouble is, Goins seems to want to lump together as "soreheads" (his word, TD Sunday July 22, page B-1)essentially the entire spectrum of those who in the past have either criticized SEDA and/or the local governments for failure to deliver. Then he proceeds to laud the locals for having worked together so hard and so unselfishly to bring in the "big one," the rail car plant.

Is Goins so dense that he does not recognize that one of the prime REASONS why so much blame was directed toward public officials and organizations in the past is their chronic past failure to act cooperatively? Their failure was rooted in a provincialism that Goins is now happy to see replaced with a spirit of cooperation. Most everyone is glad to see that, but the fact is that this yellow brick road mentality is kinda new and before all the huggin' and kissin' there was a lot of small-minded, me-first silly civic selfishness that undoubtedly crippled economic recruitment. In other words, all this wonderful cooperation sprouting up all over the Shoals is what we DID NOT have before and what the local leaders needed to be chastised for. And when, in the past, they failed to present a united front and screwed up as a result, they deserved the criticism they got.

Goins has reserved his strongest vitriol for those who opposed the RSA project in its original concept, which would have involved hijacking several hundred acres of the TVA nature trail/hiking and biking area/ and associated archaeolgical resources for the RSA golf courses. He was a shill for the RSA folks and their "partners," the local gummints as they tried to ram that ill-fated venture through against the objections of the majority of Shoals citizens. What Goins, RSA and the rest of these schemers should have known was that the land at issue was so cumbered with environmental obstacles that they NEVER would have gotten permission to develop it. The way the golf courses got built--and the only way they could have been built--was for the White Knight, Harvey Robbins, to come riding to the rescue with his land donation. And once that happened, there was essentially no more objection from the environmental sector, since the grab for the TVA land was a dead issue.

Goins, writing in an earlier column about a recent visit to the Shoals by the Mayor of Dothan, says, "He was told it's unlikely that the project will ever win over some critics. Whoever told him that obviously knew what they were talking about.

The RSA project remains a thorn in the side of some residents. Some people are against any progress. Others are likely having trouble letting go of their hope that they will some day tell us all, "I told you so.'"

Just where are all that herd of naysayers Goins refers to? Sure, there are always a few who object to most anything, but I seriously question that Goins is doing much more here than throwing up a straw man so he can send a few barbs toward those who were on the other side in the controversy over the TVA land.

How much was the good Mayor of Dothan told about how some of the local schemers, with Goins in their pocket, tried to ram through the TVA land transfer? Not a lot, I'll wager. I suspect the Mayor got hosed thoroughly with one side of the story.
Last edited {1}
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Get over the TVA land thing already. TVA, in my opinion, needs to divest itself of much of its land. Recreationaal? I think not. Much of the land in question is unused or underused, or inappropiately used, or illegally used.

Despite your incessant grumbling, the RSA project appears to be doing very well.

Isn't there anything positive that you can say?
I totally agree that Mr. Goens is in the pocket of the "powers That Be"!
He seems to be totally committed to the idea that the peasants are ignorant, and should keep their heads bowed and not question the superior knowledge of the ruling class. I believe this is known elsewhere as Socialism.
My opinion on the gas tax for RSA, and the sales tax for industrial bribery was that "WE THE PEOPLE' had a right to vote on it! If the majority wanted to support these projects, that would be fine, at least we had a voice in the decision!
Mr. Denton and crowd however are smarter than us and know that we have to be taken care of like the mindless subjects we are turning out to be, we cannot be trusted to have input into decisions that affect our lives.
In case someone has forgotten, SEDA was voted down in the mid 80's by a high 90 percent vote in a dual county referendum vote. The question was Do you want to fund this private organization with taxpayer money. The voters said NO, but Mr. Denton knew better, and changed the law so local authorities can steal our money at will, and there is absolutely NOTHING we can do about it! That is why we now pay a gas tax we didn't vote for, and a sales tax we didn't vote for!
It doesn't matter if it is for a good purpose or not, if Government takes our money we have RIGHT to have a say so in it!
Can everyone say "Boston Tea Party"?
quote:
Originally posted by falcon1234:
Get over the TVA land thing already. TVA, in my opinion, needs to divest itself of much of its land. Recreationaal? I think not. Much of the land in question is unused or underused, or inappropiately used, or illegally used.

Despite your incessant grumbling, the RSA project appears to be doing very well.

Isn't there anything positive that you can say?


I have posted nothing that argues that the RSA project is doing less than very well. As I have made it clear to any marginally sentient being (which seems not to include you), I have no objection to the RSA golf courses and hotel being located and doing business where they now are. As to the TVA land that you characterize as "unused or underused," you might take a little time and effort to answer this: During the controversy over Bronner's attempted land grab, why were the crowds that assembled in protest of the taking of that land consistently larger than the crowds assembled by the promoters on the other side? Did those protesters show up en mass to contend for land that they had no interest in? You evidently have spent little or no time on that land, or you would recognize that it is intensively used by bikers, hikers, birdwatchers and others--the kinds of folks who do not golf, but who do appreciate wholesome outdoor recreation that does not involve the use of motorized carts!
quote:
Originally posted by lilcharlotte:
JC, you need to move on.....


No, we should NEVER become complacent and "just move on" as long as there are people like Mike Goens and Falcon who want to take our heritage of land away from us and give it to the fat cats who would exploit our land for profit and have every square inch of land on our beautiful lakes and rivers with private development so that we couldn't pull up on a gravel bar and picknick or camp .
WE MUST be vigilant. Everything should NOT be about some corporation squeezing every last buck they can. Some things should be left for our future generations to enjoy.
The only ones to benefit from TVA divesting our public lands would be the money grubbing corporations , certainly not us or our children.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×